...really? Does this really have to be explained to you? That is so obviously not the scenario being suggested.
Let me begin by saying that i believe this test is most likely legit, but let's put our thinking caps on for a second and see why some may be skeptical, shall we?
Things we know:
1. This user has only ever posted in this thread.
2. There are very,
very obvious alt accounts shilling all over this thread, with new ones popping up all the time, having joined just
days ago and spouting suspiciously detailed pro-QSC talking points. You'd have to be blind, stupid, gullible, or all 3 not to see it, especially since this type of shit has happened in
zero other threads here.
Logically, given what a dishonest piece of shit he is, it follows that many of these alts may be the rep himself.
Thus, the possible scenario is that the rep (or some other QSC employee) sent in a ringer sample to be tested, and then used the "hooonst" account to pass it off as blind, 3rd party testing.
Do I think this is what happened? No.
Most of the obvious shill accounts were created around or after the time ding dong started this thread. hooonst joined well before that. Furthermore we have other 3rd party examples of their primo testing reasonably.
However, I want to reiterate that it was perfectly reasonable for members to be suspicious given the following:
1. The name of the client on the test was the source themselves. That is irregular, especially since the source did not pay for this test upfront.
2. The rep is a known liar and scammer. It would not surprise me in the
slightest if he pulled some shit like this.
3. The user in question has only ever posted in this thread, which is a trait almost all the shills and weirdo-fanboys share.
Does it make sense now?
