Sure, I get that and fully agree. My one question might be: This is a thread about enhanced vendor testing, at what point does the constant sharing of their negative opinion become trolling with no additional added value?
It is only through discussion and exchange of opinions that things evolve and move forward.
Any idea that is featured here, or anywhere else, should be the object of scrutiny and questioning.
The back and forth of pro and against does just that.
It gives space, breath and exposure to the topic, if nothing else.
Serious, humorous, sometimes childish interactions are all part of the game.
And if you think anyone against it is just "spamming", you can push back against it by proving that the point you are making is valid and how it is so.
The same goes for them.
Everybody will be annoyed at anyone providing oppositional thinking.
But it's just the way it goes.
This is not about cancelling anybody.
Despite the vast majority of the forum being against the agenda here and its spokesman (as pointed out by the owner of this site), this project is continuing and, hopefully, gaining some momentum.
I personally do not see contrasting responses as negative.
In their own way, they have always been justified.