Just about any reply to the subject of testing will, I'm almost certain, invariably result in some form of disagreement; but I will do my best.
I will state this factually and transparently:
Shortly after my introduction there were some tests done by members who used
@janoshik for the analyses. The tests seemed to satisfy the masses at that time. I wanted to make my products as attractive as possible, to the greatest number of people; so I contacted janoshik in PM where we agreed on him performing my next raw materials analyses.
After our contact, the hacking and email compromise events took place. My large inbound shipments of raw materials were not delivered as scheduled.
During the period immediately following this, the spurious results of my boldenone were posted. I began contacting W&M that day to have a full vial sent. Several days later he agreed to accept my sample and it was tested: accurately dosed.
After recovering enough to work and move into my lab, I purchased some new raw materials from a domestic supplier because the other cannot be located. When they were received, I contacted W&M for analysis for those few because I needed them to be available ASAP to align with my timeline for resuming business on this forum.
I have enough product to get me by until a larger amount can be delivered; so I intend to complete the business that I already discussed with Janoshik when my next shipment(s) arrive. I intend to do this because we had an agreement and I honor my agreements: nothing more and nothing less.
My reasons for choosing to do my future business with Janoshik are strictly business oriented and I will list them here: 1) I made the decision to conduct business with him when the member tests of my products were viewed positively by other members; 2) I agreed to send my business to him in our conversation; 3) His prices are considerably better than W&M; 4)) W&M has not been as reliably and timely responsive as I required in the recent past.
I have read all of the past drama involving analyses performed by all testers. I have no loyalty to any analytical service; and I believe that to be the most appropriate stance from a business perspective. I know that people have sent unlabeled raw materials to both testers; and they were correctly identified by both testers. Therefore I have no reservations or doubts in either tester's ability to determine the authenticity of raw materials. I hope that this correctly conveys my reasoning for this business decision.
Regarding the boldenone tests: I can only say that I knew there was no contamination of the product I sent out. Figuring out why the results were conflicting is not within my scope; and is a task better left to you all. I feel confident that I did not make a mistake with that compound because: 1) as previously stated, one is liquid-one is powder; 2) I didn't have any raw nandrolone when I compounded the boldenone; 3) No two compounds ever touch a common filter, bottle, beaker, or dispenser.
I will check into the Aegean Analyzer, and I will continue to consider W&M. But the next few raw material samples will be done by Janoshik because I already entered into agreement with him to do so.
I conduct myself this way because of the possibility of the "what-ifs":
What if there was no other testing option; and I burned a bridge with Janoshik by retracting my agreement to do business. I am certainly not implying that he would refuse me in the future if I back out now; but, again, "what if?". I realize that my notion of adherence to my word is antique in this venue; but it is part of the ethics that I hope will eventually set me apart from what is the general 'scumbag' opinion of UGLs. If it doesn't work out that way for me; at least I can fail with my integrity intact.
I hope this is sufficient to satisfy those who inquired.