MESO-Rx Exclusive The Science of Trenbolone - Second Edition

I believe I found the thread where this was mentioned.

I've never come across anything on this direct link myself, so the burden of proof would be on the person making this claim. I would happily review, if legitimate sources of evidence come out...however right now, I don't see any reason to think it is someone just making claims.


Well I find that in itself assuring. LOL.
I’m not a dumb person, but I have no medical affinity. In fact i find it intimidating to comprehend. Thank you for taking your time to look into this.
 
Hell of an article, @ChestRockwell. Certainly must have taken you more than 10 minutes this time.

Astounding that, being so net anabolic, the main mechanism is "only" anti-catabolic.

Great work, appreciated. Keep it up
 
Certainly must have taken you more than 10 minutes this time.

Haha, much longer indeed. This is the article that should have been written ages ago, but I was younger and in a hurry.

Astounding that, being so net anabolic, the main mechanism is "only" anti-catabolic.

Agreed, this is still something that tends to surprise folks. Now, there still may be a threshold by which trenbolone actually causes increased MPS, however most all of the in vivo experiments never get to this point.
 
Haha, much longer indeed. This is the article that should have been written ages ago, but I was younger and in a hurry.



Agreed, this is still something that tends to surprise folks. Now, there still may be a threshold by which trenbolone actually causes increased MPS, however most all of the in vivo experiments never get to this point.

Thank you for this. Being newer to this forum and this lifestyle i appreciate all the information i can get. I will be reading these articles in the next few days.
 
Thanks @Millard Baker

As always, if there are any questions or comments please feel free to leave them here!

Thanks for the article. Tren looks a lot less harmful to me now than I thought before reading it. (currently using 500mg per week btw)

You skipped any dosage mentions other than vague low-dose or moderate suggestions.

Can you share some thoughts on where you think the sweetspot lies? Feel free to create contexts and scenarios - would be very interesting to hear where you think the sides outweighs the benefits.
 
Thanks for the article. tren looks a lot less harmful to me now than I thought before reading it. (currently using 500mg per week btw)

Although many anecdotes exist that support the idea that trenbolone is a nasty compound, the evidence does not exist in animal studies to support this. With that said, I find quality of life to be a significant aspect of one's total AAS experience and anything that negative impacts it should be used sparingly (if at all).

You skipped any dosage mentions other than vague low-dose or moderate suggestions.

Can you share some thoughts on where you think the sweetspot lies? Feel free to create contexts and scenarios - would be very interesting to hear where you think the sides outweighs the benefits.

Yeah, I tend to avoid this on purpose because there are just so many variables to consider. An argument can certainly be made of trenbolone usage during both growth and dietary phases. Over the years I have gone from more of a "use it on diets only" to more of a "use it sparingly and only under certain conditions" view.

As I said in the article, it can be used effectively on a growth phase but possibly best saved for GH+insulin stacks. Even then, we are talking about using very modest doses and letting it act as an accessory compound.
 
Although many anecdotes exist that support the idea that trenbolone is a nasty compound, the evidence does not exist in animal studies to support this. With that said, I find quality of life to be a significant aspect of one's total AAS experience and anything that negative impacts it should be used sparingly (if at all).



Yeah, I tend to avoid this on purpose because there are just so many variables to consider. An argument can certainly be made of trenbolone usage during both growth and dietary phases. Over the years I have gone from more of a "use it on diets only" to more of a "use it sparingly and only under certain conditions" view.

As I said in the article, it can be used effectively on a growth phase but possibly best saved for GH+insulin stacks. Even then, we are talking about using very modest doses and letting it act as an accessory compound.

Slippery - quite the loss to our diplomat corps. :-)

To me (with 5 Tren cycles behind me, including the current one) below 200 per week isn't noticed, and 500 is where the quality of life issues (night sweats) kick in.

250 test and 500 Tren is what I do now and yes, there's a little headsweat at night and I do get winded faster but other than that it's OK. 250 test and 400 Tren would probably be right below any sides show.
 
Back
Top