[QUOTE"Gettinbigger76, post: 1071710, member: 66751"]It depends on what I wanted my end goal to be... If I wanted to merely squash the accusation, I would
1. probably do my best to use my intelligence to prove to the board that I can understand their apprehension and ask what I could do to help them see that I was trying to contribute to the cause or
2. I would not have said anything in the first place and let the vets sort it out...
But on the other hand, if I wanted to come off like a self righteous deuche bag, I would've handled it exactly the same way as you...
Does that answer your question??
Self righteous? If I came off that way, my bad.
Re: Your #1, I don't disagree, although I thought that was evident from my posts.
Re: #2, what's your definition of a vet? Someone who has been a member here fora couple years, 1000+ posts, and had cycled 4 or 5 times?
Or someone who is newer here, made a few posts contributing, and has been at this for 20+ years?
Flex your Forumus Dorsi and maybe I'll care
[/QUOTE]
I guess we have a different definition of using intelligence, for when I do, I don't start sentences with "holy shit you're a dumbass, aren't ya"
I guess my definition of a vet, as it pertains to these circumstances would be someone who has proven to have gone above and beyond to protect the integrity of the board and it's members...
You sir are not one of them, nor an I for that matter, but believe, I am further along than you.... Until then I depend on guys like Vol, LS, Brutus, Myth, Big Paul, Colt and so one...
But if you'd like to continue this battle of wits, please do, that's how I flex bitch....