Trump Timeline ... Trumpocalypse



WHAT, EXACTLY, did a 7-year-old Congolese girl do to the United States to deserve the trauma that has been visited upon her — including forcible separation from her mother — by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and her immigration agents?

There is no allegation that the little girl, known in court filings only as S.S., is a terrorist, nor is there any suggestion her mother is one. Neither was involved with smuggling, nor contraband, nor lawbreaking of any other variety. Rather, S.S.’s 39-year-old mother https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/02/27/mother-child-fled-congo-fearing-death-ice-has-held-them-separately-for-months-lawsuit-says/?utm_term=.2eecf15e2814 (presented herself and her daughter) to U.S. officials when they crossed the border from Mexico four months ago, explaining they had fled extreme violence in Congo, and requesting asylum.

A U.S. asylum officer interviewed Ms. L, as the mother is called in http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/asylum-lawsuit/2788/ (a lawsuit)filed on her behalf by the American Civil Liberties Union, determined that she had a credible fear of harm if she were returned to Congo and stood a decent chance of ultimately being granted asylum. Despite that preliminary finding, officials decided that the right thing to do was to wrench S.S. from her mother, whereupon the mother “could hear her daughter in the next room frantically screaming that she wanted to remain with her mother,” the lawsuit states.

The Trump administration https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/to-curb-illegal-border-crossings-trump-administration-weighs-new-measures-targeting-families/2017/12/21/19300dc2-e66c-11e7-9ec2-518810e7d44d_story.html?utm_term=.07e467d8e43f (has said) that it is considering separating parents from their children as a means of deterring other families, most of them Central American, from undertaking the perilous trip necessary to reach the United States and seek asylum. Now, without any formal announcement, that cruel practice, ruled out by previous administrations, has become increasingly common, immigrant advocacy groups say. In the nine months preceding February, government agents separated children from their parents 53 times, according to data compiled by the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service.

Make no mistake: Ms. L and S.S. could have been placed together in a family detention center. There has been no explanation of why the determination was made to separate them; nor is there any allegation that Ms. L. is an unfit parent. The only principle at work, if it can be called that, is the idea that future asylum seekers might be deterred if they are convinced that the United States is actually a crueler and more heartless place than their native country.

Gratuitous malice toward children is not a characteristic one generally associates with the United States, but under Ms. Nielsen’s guidance, the Department of Homeland Security seems intent on changing that.
 


His security-blanket “calmer” Hope Hicks has quit and Robert Mueller’s investigation rolls on unabated, so Donald Trump‘s one-time friend Donny Deutsch sees the president’s new trade war over steel tariffs as his “shiny new thing” to turn attention away from his troubles.

“You’re really starting to see the beginning of a cornered Donald Trump,” Deutsch, a New York City advertising executive said Friday on MSNBC, one day after Trump announced new tariffs on steel and aluminum that sent the stock market falling and had allies like Canada denouncing the move as “unacceptable.”

The tariffs fulfilled one of Trump’s isolationist “Make America Great Again” campaign promises that are important to the GOP base most loyal to Trump, no matter how embattled he becomes. But, notes Retired Naval admiral Jim Stavridis, who is dean of Tufts University’s graduate school on international relations, “There are no winners in trade wars.”

“This was a very bad day, globally,” Stavridis said, also on MSNBC.

Continued Deutsch: “What is [Trump] capable of doing at the expense of the world or the United States or the consumer to save himself? I’m concerned that this is a harbinger of things to come. What will he do with North Korea at the expense of the rest of the world?”
 


WASHINGTON — As Russia’s virtual war against the United States continues unabated with the midterm elections approaching, the State Department has yet to spend any of the $120 million it has been allocated since late 2016 to counter foreign efforts to meddle in elections or sow distrust in democracy.

As a result, not one of the 23 analysts working in the department’s Global Engagement Center — which has been tasked with countering Moscow’s disinformation campaign — speaks Russian, and a department hiring freeze has hindered efforts to recruit the computer experts needed to track the Russian efforts.

The delay is just one symptom of the largely passive response to the Russian interference by President Trump, who has made little if any public effort to rally the nation to confront Moscow and defend democratic institutions. More broadly, the funding lag reflects a deep lack of confidence by Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson in his department’s ability to execute its historically wide-ranging mission and spend its money wisely.

Mr. Tillerson has voiced skepticism that the United States is even capable of doing anything to counter the Russian threat.
 


WASHINGTON — Rejecting Canada’s plea for an immediate exemption from his https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/03/01/trump-says-hell-impose-a-25-per-cent-steel-tariff-which-could-decimate-canadas-industry-if-it-applies.htmll (looming steel and aluminum tariffs), U.S. President Donald Trump says he’ll only lift the tariffs if Canada agrees to a “fair” new North American Free Trade Agreement.

“We have large trade deficits with Mexico and Canada. NAFTA, which is under renegotiation right now, has been a bad deal for U.S.A. Massive relocation of companies & jobs. Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum will only come off if new & fair NAFTA agreement is signed,” he wrote on Twitter on Monday morning.

He continued: “Also, Canada must treat our farmers much better. Highly restrictive. Mexico must do much more on stopping drugs from pouring into the U.S. They have not done what needs to be done. Millions of people addicted and dying.”

Trump had not previously linked the steel and aluminum tariffs, which he announced on Thursday, to the fate of NAFTA, which has been under renegotiation since August.

His decision to do so raised eyebrows among trade advocates, who noted that the official justification for the tariffs is that the current steel and aluminum situation threatens U.S. “national security” and that Trump’s unofficial economic justification has centred on what he calls unfair practices by China.

Even before Trump’s tweets, the announcement of tariffs had already complicated the NAFTA negotiations.
 
We can’t even get authoritarianism right
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/wp/2018/03/05/we-cant-even-get-authoritarianism-right/?utm_term=.dbb3d9324247

We are approaching a fork in the road, and we may well take it hard. The November elections offer perhaps our last opportunity to slow down, pull over, turn around, start heading back to . . . and there’s the problem. Do we even remember at this point where we came from?

As we proceed headlong into the 21st century, and watch the formerly self-evidents shrink in the rear-view mirror — including faith in democracy — one has to start thinking about the formerly unthinkable. Or at least mull the formerly unmulled.

Is the Era of Democracy over? It was 1989 when history was declared ended and democracy the winner. But 1989, come to think of it, was thirty years ago — more than a generation. People may not remember, because we are largely different people. This is the eternal problem with eternal standards. You may want them to stay eternal, but you yourself are not. New people, new ideas. Democracy lasted as long as it did for two reasons. One, it’s a pretty good idea. But secondly, and perhaps more importantly, people could see it working for them.

Until it didn’t so much. You can lecture people and show them all the PowerPoint graphs you want about how we are all richer now on average, but people are going to make their own judgments about how they are doing within that average. And all over the democratic world, a lot of people don’t like what they see. They see democracy that doesn’t feel very democratic. They examine their own well-being and don’t feel so well. They measure their own power and feel that somebody else made off with it. Trouble brewing.

At the same time, they look around to see who else is doing what, and one of the things they see is China. China has been doing very well. China is not democratic. Lesson to be learned?

If so, we are not even learning that lesson correctly. Because China is many things other than undemocratic. China, generally speaking, is smart. It is patient. It has a plan, and it uses its stability to pursue that plan. The United States, on the other hand, has been imperiling its democracy with an exact opposite set of traits. We are behaving stupidly, impatiently, with no plan and decreasing stability.

Our version of authoritarianism is more in keeping with a banana republic, though that may give banana republics a bad name.

We have our own version: the tangerine republic.
 
"It is known that the Trump campaign was communicating with the Russians about help and that Trump was personally involved in an effort to conceal information about these contacts from the public. The president is right in the middle of questions about Russian interference."

 


WASHINGTON (AP) — They spent their first year in Washington as an untouchable White House power couple, commanding expansive portfolios, outlasting rivals and enjoying unmatched access to the president. But Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump have undergone a swift and stunning reckoning of late, their powers restricted, their enemies emboldened and their future in the West Wing uncertain.
 
Top