Les
New Member
Seems like a real sharp guy. Verbally dismantled people on a couple of the youtube videos I watched. I'm def going to look into him some more but so far so good.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Trump Timeline ... Trumpocalypse
- Thread starter CdnGuy
- Start date
Seems like a real sharp guy. Verbally dismantled people on a couple of the youtube videos I watched. I'm def going to look into him some more but so far so good.
No more pussies in the White House , its the tough guys turn now . Lookout World , you're on probation from here out....
Buckle-Up !
Speaking of STUPID....
Anti-Trump Protests: Proof Of Professional Activist Involvement
by Tyler Durden
Nov 13, 2016 12:38 PM
In a story from November 12, USA Today writes an article to discredit the idea that the professional activist community is involved with organizing anti-Trump protests. They invite you to meet the protesters. USA today presents them as ordinary people. However, WikiLeaks exposes them as experienced protest organizers and activists.
USA Today presents the protests as spontaneous, involving people from “all walks of life” – certainly not professional protesters. If anyone in the crowd has protest experience, it hasn’t been since the Vietnam Era:
Ben Wikler, Washington director for the professional activist group MoveOn, is quoted – only to insist that these are not organized protests but an “enormous outpouring of spontaneous energy and concern.”
So should we expect that everyone quoted in that article is there out of spontaneous concern? Would a reputable newspaper properly identify its sources, noting if they were known activists and organizers? Let’s meet USA Today’s first protester:
USA Today presents Yong Jung Cho without any introduction. Is she an average citizen, or an experienced protest coordinator? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15620, Yong Jung Cho is described as “350 Action Campaign Coordinator”.
On twitter, she claims credit for organizing the protest in an offhanded way that shows she does not consider herself to be a rookie:
The profile for this promising young activist at netrootsnation highlights her experience as an organizer on the protest scene and her involvement with the presidential primary at the state level:
So USA Today’s first person from “all walks of life” is an organizer who has experience on the activist circuit, and in that capacity she worked on the presidential primary. Not exactly the “spontaneous concern” presented by the newspaper.
How about another source, someone that USA Today introduces by more than just a name? Here’s Phil Roeder, a public school official with no disclosed interest except the welfare of his students:
So: Phil Roeder, concerned public servant without a partisan agenda, or https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44837? Once again, WikiLeaks can shed some light on that question.
In the same 2014 email from the Podesta collection, we find that many of the activists in the Iowa organization had private meetings with Obama and Clinton, and that Phil Roeder was prominent in the group. It is not surprising that he would want to be quoted in an anti-Trump piece after Clinton’s defeat, but it would be surprising for an honest newspaper to fail to disclose that connection to the readers.
Phil Roeder is well-enough connected in Democratic circles that he merits more than one mention in WikiLeaks. In May 2015 in the Podesta emails – some years after Roeder became a prominent political organizer in Iowa – we find a https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16494document on Iowa, in an https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/16494/4302for Iowa flagged “Do Not Distribute”, including this press clipping:
So the Iowa Daily Democrat recognizes Phil Roeder as a Democratic strategist, but somehow USA Today didn’t.
USA Today cites an academic who reassures us that these are not professionally organized protests:
If the demonstrations aren’t premeditated, then why are all these average citizens actually well-connected activists and protest organizers? USA Today has misrepresented its sources in a way that falsifies their own narrative that the closest we have to protesters are old-timers who “haven’t toted a protest sign since their anti-war days in the 1970s”. USA Today has instead helped demonstrate that the professional protest community is in fact behind the current political protests.
Though seen as a reputable newspaper (if biased, recall its editorial board declared "Trump is 'unfit for the presidency') USA Today should have identified at least some of its sources accurately. Is the quoted academic Kari Winter “professor of American studies”? That’s not quite how her employer describes her.
USA Today may not have accurately introduced anyone quoted in that article other than a high school student and the MoveOn activist.
There is one more WikiLeaks connection for this article: USA Today appears in the WikiLeaks, and not always in a capacity different from the activists. In this leaked email, the DNC schedule for an upcoming “earned media” campaign shows complete confidence that the editorial board of USA Today and other organizations will coordinate their schedules and their https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/3913 (editorial priorities to suit the DNC).
The DNC treats reporters, newspapers, activist groups and PACs as all part of the campaign. The DNC draws no distinction between key allies and reporters. This USA Today story shows that the DNC is probably right about that.
by Tyler Durden
Nov 13, 2016 12:38 PM
In a story from November 12, USA Today writes an article to discredit the idea that the professional activist community is involved with organizing anti-Trump protests. They invite you to meet the protesters. USA today presents them as ordinary people. However, WikiLeaks exposes them as experienced protest organizers and activists.
USA Today presents the protests as spontaneous, involving people from “all walks of life” – certainly not professional protesters. If anyone in the crowd has protest experience, it hasn’t been since the Vietnam Era:
They come in all ages and walks of life, unflinching and determined to be heard.
Mothers with young children, hoping to impart an up-close lesson in history. Animated college students stretching their political vocal cords for the first time. Aging Baby Boomers who haven't toted a protest sign since their anti-war days in the 1970s.
Mothers with young children, hoping to impart an up-close lesson in history. Animated college students stretching their political vocal cords for the first time. Aging Baby Boomers who haven't toted a protest sign since their anti-war days in the 1970s.
Ben Wikler, Washington director for the professional activist group MoveOn, is quoted – only to insist that these are not organized protests but an “enormous outpouring of spontaneous energy and concern.”
MoveOn urged Americans to gather peacefully to "take a continued stand against misogyny, racism, Islamophobia and xenophobia." Within hours, about 275 protests and vigils had been organized nationwide Wednesday, Wikler said. "There was an enormous outpouring of spontaneous energy and concern."
So should we expect that everyone quoted in that article is there out of spontaneous concern? Would a reputable newspaper properly identify its sources, noting if they were known activists and organizers? Let’s meet USA Today’s first protester:
Yong Jung Cho, 26, who organized a candlelight vigil in front of the White House on Wednesday night, said about 2,000 people showed up. "Together, we sang, we cried and we marched" to Trump's hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue. "In this moment, the protests are showing the people, the country and the world that we are here for each other."
USA Today presents Yong Jung Cho without any introduction. Is she an average citizen, or an experienced protest coordinator? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15620, Yong Jung Cho is described as “350 Action Campaign Coordinator”.
On twitter, she claims credit for organizing the protest in an offhanded way that shows she does not consider herself to be a rookie:
The profile for this promising young activist at netrootsnation highlights her experience as an organizer on the protest scene and her involvement with the presidential primary at the state level:
So USA Today’s first person from “all walks of life” is an organizer who has experience on the activist circuit, and in that capacity she worked on the presidential primary. Not exactly the “spontaneous concern” presented by the newspaper.
How about another source, someone that USA Today introduces by more than just a name? Here’s Phil Roeder, a public school official with no disclosed interest except the welfare of his students:
"The majority of students at Des Moines Public Schools are students of color," Phil Roeder, the district's director of communications and public affairs, said in a statement earlier this week. "The rhetoric of this past election has caused many concerns and divisions among them, their friends and their families. The school district will not stand in the way of our students peacefully expressing their concerns."
So: Phil Roeder, concerned public servant without a partisan agenda, or https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44837? Once again, WikiLeaks can shed some light on that question.
In the same 2014 email from the Podesta collection, we find that many of the activists in the Iowa organization had private meetings with Obama and Clinton, and that Phil Roeder was prominent in the group. It is not surprising that he would want to be quoted in an anti-Trump piece after Clinton’s defeat, but it would be surprising for an honest newspaper to fail to disclose that connection to the readers.
Phil Roeder is well-enough connected in Democratic circles that he merits more than one mention in WikiLeaks. In May 2015 in the Podesta emails – some years after Roeder became a prominent political organizer in Iowa – we find a https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16494document on Iowa, in an https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/16494/4302for Iowa flagged “Do Not Distribute”, including this press clipping:
So the Iowa Daily Democrat recognizes Phil Roeder as a Democratic strategist, but somehow USA Today didn’t.
USA Today cites an academic who reassures us that these are not professionally organized protests:
The demonstrations have not been "premeditated," said Kari Winter, a University at Buffalo professor of American studies who has researched protest movements.
If the demonstrations aren’t premeditated, then why are all these average citizens actually well-connected activists and protest organizers? USA Today has misrepresented its sources in a way that falsifies their own narrative that the closest we have to protesters are old-timers who “haven’t toted a protest sign since their anti-war days in the 1970s”. USA Today has instead helped demonstrate that the professional protest community is in fact behind the current political protests.
Though seen as a reputable newspaper (if biased, recall its editorial board declared "Trump is 'unfit for the presidency') USA Today should have identified at least some of its sources accurately. Is the quoted academic Kari Winter “professor of American studies”? That’s not quite how her employer describes her.
USA Today may not have accurately introduced anyone quoted in that article other than a high school student and the MoveOn activist.
There is one more WikiLeaks connection for this article: USA Today appears in the WikiLeaks, and not always in a capacity different from the activists. In this leaked email, the DNC schedule for an upcoming “earned media” campaign shows complete confidence that the editorial board of USA Today and other organizations will coordinate their schedules and their https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/3913 (editorial priorities to suit the DNC).
The DNC treats reporters, newspapers, activist groups and PACs as all part of the campaign. The DNC draws no distinction between key allies and reporters. This USA Today story shows that the DNC is probably right about that.
dantheghman
Banned
Funny how you listened to exactly what he said and claimed it was racist. He was saying a lot of what are coming in are criminals and rapist and he is right. If you fallowed his campaign in ever state he made a speech he would pick example of life lost due to illegal immigrants, some having hand fills of convictions who were set for deportation yet were still allowed to stay and eventually killing legal citizens. Thanks to obama and his bullshit. You're making us Canadians look like media pigs. Come on!
dantheghman
Banned
Stop talking politics you clearly base what your saying on opinion. When you get some facts return and contribute.
dantheghman
Banned
A couple? He destroys most of the senate FBI and even comey himself. He is what Americans need. He speaks no bullshit and isn't so pussified that he gives a shit if someone's career gets ruined because they did it to themselves attitude.
Les
New Member
A couple meaning the couple that I've watched to this point.
Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk
dantheghman
Banned
Well some how you must be one of these people that don't know what racist means. The MEDIA has grown that word to be way more than it is. They have made it so technically anything and everything can be considered racist. Asking minorities for Id at polling stations is RACIST. Simply supporting Donald is racist and the list goes on and on and on. Please find me some actual proof he is a racist and don't bring me some media clip or anything like that. The clip you provided shows no racist words being spoken. Unless you let the media convince you it was!Spoon fed lies? Anything I have commented on has been words straight from Donalds Big mouth! It's quite fitting someone like you would consider Trump in the "great man" category lol I see you have high standards .Good night
dantheghman
Banned
Fair enough. Keep watching!
Les
New Member
You're way to wound up to be Canadian.
Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk
dantheghman
Banned
Glad you like him. Did this silly ole Canadian steer you down that path?Im gonna take a guess
Trey dont care
Im just getting acquainted with him. Youtube'd some of his work. Exposing Hillarys lies, going after Black Lives Matter. Dude is wicked. Im impressed
dantheghman
Banned
No im Canadian bro. I'm wound up for good reason. The same trash that's raveged your country are now in a power play to strengthen there hold on Canada. So I fight on both sides and try an open my neibors eyes to it also. We're all together in this game called life and we all need to see filth for what it is. The PC movement is one of division and reverse bigotry and racism. Always they put minorities in the power seats. Trudeau here is the biggest pussified shill we have ever seen. Since his pedophile father that is
dantheghman
Banned
Only people incapable of listening to the truth!
dantheghman
Banned
The fact that I'm Canadian and know more of what's going on in AMERICAN politics sais something people! I'll keep giving you fuel to the fire over the next few days. Gowdy is just a start.
Les
New Member
Nah brother 100% American made here.Even the Canadians are fighting amongs theirselves now ...
Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk
I should hope so (your flying the flag) ....
dantheghman
Banned
Were we even fighting though? Just remember a Canadian just gave all you Americans this information.
