xy5jn0
New Member
But but but if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor promised barry soetoro.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Trump Timeline ... Trumpocalypse
- Thread starter CdnGuy
- Start date
Maybe you are not aware that in every other advanced nation on earth healthcare isn't a concern
We pay 2 times as much for half as much coverage. Blame the republican fucks you send to congress. Better yet educate yourself. Since you were so easly snowed by trump I'm not optimistic.
Hows that obamacare working out. Even the architect of the bill said they relied on a level of stupidity from voters.
Jeremiahflex
Well-known Member
Lol how is that possible
Jeremiahflex
Well-known Member
Jeremiahflex
Well-known Member
Did you really just quote this crazy bitch.
Nah, it's just your imagination
When President Donald Trump addressed NATO leaders during his debut overseas trip little more than a week ago, he surprised and disappointed European allies who hoped—and expected—he would use his speech to explicitly reaffirm America’s commitment to mutual defense of the alliance’s members, a one-for-all, all-for-one provision that looks increasingly urgent as Eastern European members worry about the threat from a resurgent Russia on their borders.
That part of the Trump visit is known.
What’s not is that the president also disappointed—and surprised—his own top national security officials by failing to include the language reaffirming the so-called Article 5 provision in his speech. National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson all supported Trump doing so and had worked in the weeks leading up to the trip to make sure it was included in the speech, according to five sources familiar with the episode. They thought it was, and a White House aide even told the New York Times the day before the line was definitely included.
It was not until the next day, Thursday, May 25, when Trump started talking at an opening ceremony for NATO’s new Brussels headquarters, that the president’s national security team realized their boss had made a decision with major consequences – without consulting or even informing them in advance of the change.
Last edited:
As President Trump renewed his push Sunday for a travel ban in the wake of another terrorist attack in England, new opposition emerged from Republican and Democratic lawmakers.
Several lawmakers suggested in TV interviews Sunday that Trump’s proposed ban, which blocked immigrants from six majority-Muslim countries but was halted by federal courts, is no longer necessary since the administration has had the time it claimed it needed to develop beefed-up vetting procedures to screen people coming to the United States.
xy5jn0
New Member
There are plenty of Muslims already here that privately support the terrorist's actions, and many more on the fence between wanting peace and despising the militant actions of Western governments in Muslim countries. A travel ban will hardly be a barrier to what is already here, and will very likely push more than a few off the fence.
If Trump had wanted to make a dent in terrorist actions, he would not be in bed with the one government most responsible for promoting and financing terrorist activity, and the only government to have attacked the US on US soil in over a hundred years - the Saudis.
Jeremiahflex
Well-known Member
Yup our boy Trump is getting even more unglued.
Jeremiahflex
Well-known Member
Jeremiahflex
Well-known Member
