Here is where I stopped reading the last time I started that article:
"I stick to my thesis from October 2015. There is no evidence that Donald Trump is more racist than any past Republican candidate (or any other 70 year old white guy, for that matter)."
I took a writing course focused on rhetoric in college... If I had attempted a paper and included the gem above as my standpoint, I would have failed the class.
I read it a little further this time and as far as I can tell, the author does make a good case on something.. that is to remain neutral in regards to the belief that Trump is a racist. Not to believe he IS or that he ISN'T. Which is essentially what I would ask, that's why I mentioned it would be wise to watch without making up your mind just yet... It is also why Scally's posts in regards to Trump being a racist are not necessarily propaganda.