I can't believe what I saw on my blood test results. Before I went on a 5 IUs HGH a day, my natural HGH level was 0.03 ng/mL or something like that.
Current HGH level (on 5 IUs a day) is 5.88ng/mL, and reference range is 0.00 - 3.00.
So I'm satisfied with the HGH level. However, the IGF-1 level is unbelievably low.
IGF-1 is 248.5ng/mL, and the reference range is 60.0 - 350.0
I expected IGF-1 to be slightly or significantly above the reference, not within the reference range.
So, I'm injecting a crazy dose (5 IUs a day), and IGF-1 is still within reference range. Does that mean that when my HGH level was natural (0.03 ng/mL), my IGF-1 was actually below the reference range? Because if it's only 248.5 ng/mL when the HGH level is 5.58 ng/mL, which is well above the reference range, then how much was it when HGH was 0.03, which is below reference range for HGH in adults?
I'm legit scared and terrified right now. Is it reasonable to assume my face (facial bone), body (size and height), and secondary male sex characteristics are underdeveloped, assuming my HGH has always been low, which caused low IGF-1 during the rapid growth phase of my body?
If significantly elevated HGH can't cause my IGF-1 to be above reference range, does that mean that the natural HGH level, which is usually low, kept IGF-1 below or at the bottom of the reference range my whole life?
Current HGH level (on 5 IUs a day) is 5.88ng/mL, and reference range is 0.00 - 3.00.
So I'm satisfied with the HGH level. However, the IGF-1 level is unbelievably low.
IGF-1 is 248.5ng/mL, and the reference range is 60.0 - 350.0
I expected IGF-1 to be slightly or significantly above the reference, not within the reference range.
So, I'm injecting a crazy dose (5 IUs a day), and IGF-1 is still within reference range. Does that mean that when my HGH level was natural (0.03 ng/mL), my IGF-1 was actually below the reference range? Because if it's only 248.5 ng/mL when the HGH level is 5.58 ng/mL, which is well above the reference range, then how much was it when HGH was 0.03, which is below reference range for HGH in adults?
I'm legit scared and terrified right now. Is it reasonable to assume my face (facial bone), body (size and height), and secondary male sex characteristics are underdeveloped, assuming my HGH has always been low, which caused low IGF-1 during the rapid growth phase of my body?
If significantly elevated HGH can't cause my IGF-1 to be above reference range, does that mean that the natural HGH level, which is usually low, kept IGF-1 below or at the bottom of the reference range my whole life?