Rido
Subscriber
I think victor black follows this belief systemI have heard this - is it true that insulin could be used a a kind of harm reduction strategy i.e. add insulin so can get more bang for buck and therefore can use less AAS for the same gains thus reducing long-term harm (but increasing possibility of short-term harm from insulin but as they see this as easily manageable it is not seen as an increase in harm)?
ex.
8 week cycle
1000mg of test
1000mg of mast
1mg of arimidex a weak to combat e2
vs
20-24 week cycle
400mg of test(assuming you do not need an AI
400 mast
8units of hgh
10 units of lantus a day.
No AI needed
longer run but reducing longer term harm.
He didnt say this above cycle, just using it as an example