6 Finger Pharmaceutical HGH

there is nothing alarming, but the igfs off of six fingers are lower. why you feel the need to defend every sponsor at pm that pays for the advertising is weird

How is it lower, on the 6F's reds on 10/23/15 it is 381; that is actually the highest of all his scores posted in that list, not the lowest? On his white tops on 2/5/16 it is 302, which seems to be right around the middle of the pack.

Its not a matter of defending anyone, its about reading comprehension and understanding the tests properly. You made a comment that 6F's GH appears underdosed from the HGH Testing thread on PM. That is fine and completely fair and valid if you have the proof to back it up. As shown, and as usual, you do not.
 
11/20/15 - *487ng/mL* - 1 Week on *1 vial P/D (3.33Mgs.)
11/27/15 - *821ng/mL* - 1 Week on *3 Vials P/D

How did he get levels to this? Using a whole vial? or 3 whole vials?
 
How is it lower, on the 6F's reds on 10/23/15 it is 381; that is actually the highest of all his scores posted in that list, not the lowest? On his white tops on 2/5/16 it is 302, which seems to be right around the middle of the pack.

Its not a matter of defending anyone, its about reading comprehension and understanding the tests properly. You made a comment that 6F's GH appears underdosed from the HGH Testing thread on PM. That is fine and completely fair and valid if you have the proof to back it up. As shown, and as usual, you do not.
his numbers for six fingers were not as high as the numbers for tp
 
his numbers for six fingers were not as high as the numbers for tp

So 381 is lower than tbe scores on tp's rips and greys? What are u reading? And rips were lab tested to be 13iu and it was common knowledge they were overdosed when they were in production.
 
So 381 is lower than tbe scores on tp's rips and greys? What are u reading? And rips were lab tested to be 13iu and it was common knowledge they were overdosed when they were in production.
11/20/15 - *487ng/mL* - 1 Week on *1 vial P/D (3.33Mgs.)
11/27/15 - *821ng/mL* - 1 Week on *3 Vials P/D
1/20/16 - 122ng/mL - 1 Hour 39 mins. Post 10 IU Inject
12/05/15 - 230ng/mL - 1 Week off all HGH
1/9/16 - 164ng/mL - 6 days off HGH
1/15/16 - 159ng.mL - 11 days off HGH
1/30/16 - 299ng/mL 10 days on 5iu's P/D
2/5/16 - 302ng/mL on 16 days 5iu's P/D + Started AAS 1/30/16 -tren A, Mast P, NPP.

are these not the numbers for the 6 fingerts, and I'm ignoring the two high numbers for injecting i vial per day. i was talking about the 5 iu per day number which i believe compares to the tp testing
 
11/20/15 - *487ng/mL* - 1 Week on *1 vial P/D (3.33Mgs.)
11/27/15 - *821ng/mL* - 1 Week on *3 Vials P/D
1/20/16 - 122ng/mL - 1 Hour 39 mins. Post 10 IU Inject
12/05/15 - 230ng/mL - 1 Week off all HGH
1/9/16 - 164ng/mL - 6 days off HGH
1/15/16 - 159ng.mL - 11 days off HGH
1/30/16 - 299ng/mL 10 days on 5iu's P/D
2/5/16 - 302ng/mL on 16 days 5iu's P/D + Started AAS 1/30/16 -tren A, Mast P, NPP.

are these not the numbers for the 6 fingerts, and I'm ignoring the two high numbers for injecting i vial per day. i was talking about the 5 iu per day number which i believe compares to the tp testing

The white tops and red rooskies are both 6F's and the same GH. So he has 2 sets of data from 6F, one higher than the other; but none tbat would suggest they are underdosed. I think your confusion is that you dont realize that "red rooskies" is a nickname buck gave to 6F''s on his first batch that had red tops.
 
Yes Sir, I didnt care for the test on 1/30
That was clean on 5 iu's for 10 days.
How ever If ya look at the test s before It seems It take me longer to get scores up. off the cuff not lookin at results I came off gear and waited for bloods to clear and did a red tops than a HGHman green and went back and forth for weeks and scores climbed for several weeks, everytime in fact.
untill they peaked
The other tests are on gear so toss those.
now the big tests 10 iu and 30 iu i have nothing to compare to those do seem low IF ya do the 100 points per iu guess. but again it was just a few days on ( 7) and I think it takes me longer to reach Saturation.....
But I will put that therory to the test in the future....
I appreciate ya lookin me over and giving your for sights.
Different opinions or the way others look at things or interpreter things may seem controversial at times but I think it is for the best as long as intentions are pure.

The earth at 1 time was thought to b flat then some crazy bastard claimed it B Round.
There is still a flat earth society BTW.


Peace
 
I will Clarify a little bit
11/20/15 - *487ng/mL* - 1 Week on *1 vial P/D (3.33Mgs.)
11/27/15 - *821ng/mL* - 1 Week on *3 Vials P/D
1/20/16 - 122ng/mL - 1 Hour 39 mins. Post 10 IU Inject; This test was to replicate Pro X theory I was at baseline for a few days and did 1 10 IU hit and had a IGF-1 and Serum draw 1 hour 39 mins post injection to see if IGF-1 levels rise that soon after HGH administration.
12/05/15 - 230ng/mL - 1 Week off all HGH; On no HGH for 1 week coming from a 821 igf-1 score.
1/9/16 - 164ng/mL - 6 days off HGH; lookin 4 a baseline IGF-1
1/15/16 - 159ng.mL - 11 days off HGH; same
1/30/16 - 299ng/mL 10 days on 5iu's P/D; No xplination needed.
2/5/16 - 302ng/mL on 16 days 5iu's P/D + Started AAS 1/30/16 -tren A, Mast P, NPP.
Gear fucks with my IGF-1 levels....

Rips
04/03/15 - IGF-1 - 335ng/mL - 10 days on - Range 61-200ng/mL
04/10/15 - IGF-1 - 326ng/mL
04/17/15 - IGF-1 - 343ng/mL
04/24/15 - IGF-1 - 310ng/mL

6 fingers
10/09/15 - IGF-1 - 319ng/mL - 1 Week on this product
10/23/15 - IGF-1 - 381ng/mL - 1 Week on this product 3 weeks on HGH

Thats the whole story the best I can give it at this point.....
 
all those igf are super confusing, different IU everyday, not taking the same IU for every different brand. Results are all over the places.
 
all those igf are super confusing, different IU everyday, not taking the same IU for every different brand. Results are all over the places.
There is 1 10 iu p/d test and 1 30 iu's test.
my latest tests are 5 iu p/d on a AAS cycle. these I would not give much merit to as my IGF-1 levels take a hit while on. the reason I post these is to show this.and are not posted to show a fault in the HGH. Rather to show diminishing IGF-1 scores on a AAS cycle.
ALL other tests are on 3.33 IU's P/D. CLEAN
Now IF Anyone wants to draw conclusions that the IGF-1 levels are showing that the HGH is lacking or underdosed.
They would be mistaken.
So I ask if you use my results (and PLZ Do) do some research and Know what you are looking at and why. read what and why we are testing and not just view xcerps of results. much more info can be gained from this.
Questions will always arise.
Ask
Know the limitations of all tests.
Srry if things look confusing or all over the place.
The more tests that are run the tests there are to look at.

Peace
 
Yes Sir, I didnt care for the test on 1/30
That was clean on 5 iu's for 10 days.
How ever If ya look at the test s before It seems It take me longer to get scores up. off the cuff not lookin at results I came off gear and waited for bloods to clear and did a red tops than a HGHman green and went back and forth for weeks and scores climbed for several weeks, everytime in fact.
untill they peaked
The other tests are on gear so toss those.
now the big tests 10 iu and 30 iu i have nothing to compare to those do seem low IF ya do the 100 points per iu guess. but again it was just a few days on ( 7) and I think it takes me longer to reach Saturation.....
But I will put that therory to the test in the future....
I appreciate ya lookin me over and giving your for sights.
Different opinions or the way others look at things or interpreter things may seem controversial at times but I think it is for the best as long as intentions are pure.

The earth at 1 time was thought to b flat then some crazy bastard claimed it B Round.
There is still a flat earth society BTW.


Peace

This was so fucking confusing to read. I have no idea what you are saying.
 
There is 1 10 iu p/d test and 1 30 iu's test.
my latest tests are 5 iu p/d on a AAS cycle. these I would not give much merit to as my IGF-1 levels take a hit while on. the reason I post these is to show this.and are not posted to show a fault in the HGH. Rather to show diminishing IGF-1 scores on a AAS cycle.
ALL other tests are on 3.33 IU's P/D. CLEAN
Now IF Anyone wants to draw conclusions that the IGF-1 levels are showing that the HGH is lacking or underdosed.
They would be mistaken.
So I ask if you use my results (and PLZ Do) do some research and Know what you are looking at and why. read what and why we are testing and not just view xcerps of results. much more info can be gained from this.
Questions will always arise.
Ask
Know the limitations of all tests.
Srry if things look confusing or all over the place.
The more tests that are run the tests there are to look at.

Peace
Buck, thanks for the response without the name calling. carries alot more weight
 
Buck, thanks for the response without the name calling. carries alot more weight

Please show me where i called you names in this thread. You may not like my directness, but i have only stated facts. Dont forget you are the one that claimed 6f's GH to be underdosed based solely on bucks data and ignoring all others positive data. Buck even stated in his last post that anyone that thinks his data shows that is mistaken.
 
This was so fucking confusing to read. I have no idea what you are saying.

I hope I was able to clear that up with subsequent posts
Sorry, My xplination would be that I live this and as such I am very familiar with what I have done and doin. this took months to accumulate these tests.
So someone coming in and viewin or following a few days. I could see how that could be confusing.

Hope my clarification helped

Peace
 
Last edited:
Soon We will have a few of these samples in the Lab for analyzation.
I believe this will answer all.
Sorry if I offended anyone with my name calling.
This is the second time this has come up.
Initially I called the Red Tops " Commie Reds" and it was brought to my attention that some thought this was insensitive on my part.
Rooskie Reds I thought a better more friendly option , but again if this is offensive or considered Calling names, i must apologize.

Peace
 
Soon We will have a few of these samples in the Lab for analyzation.
I believe this will answer all.
Sorry if I offended anyone with my name calling.
This is the second time this has come up.
Initially I called the Red Tops " Commie Reds" and it was brought to my attention that some thought this was insensitive on my part.
Rooskie Reds I thought a better more friendly option , but again if this is offensive or considered Calling names, i must apologize.

Peace
I feel sorry for people that are so easily offended, life must be hard with such delicate feelings.
 
Back
Top