A Newbies Idea for all future sources looking to Sell here...

[Millard]

Rather than rely on forums/admins/mods to dictate a list of "approved" or "endorsed" sources, MESO would rather create a forum that actively encourages individuals to critically evaluate evidence and make their own decisions based on the uncensored free flow of information.

Millard has never condoned illegal sources exploiting the gift of free speech he has provided members. This is and never will be a source board. Part of the uncensored forum allows both good and bad, but the good out weighs the bad any day.

Thanks! It's hard for me to understand why so many people are staunchly opposed to such an approach. The good does outweigh the bad. But I guess focusing on the bad better serves the agenda of many of MESO's critiques.

 

[Dresden]

Based on the facts and responses in this thread I come to the conclusion the OP is either a potential source or a big troll.

You would be wrong on both...

 

[Dresden]

So on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being willing to suck dick for a source, I'm guessing you're a 9.5-10 based on this thread.

Ummm never asked for a source.. not one...if i did please put that exact quote here

I guess you were all giddy and giggling and shit typing that juvenile response, don't even know why I'm responding to you since your obviously not an adult..Mentally

 

[Dresden]

This board is uncensored use the search button we been here before fuck all sources until they have proved themselves
Which aren't many
Maybe a handful

Ok understood....

 

[Dresden]

Thanks! It's hard for me to understand why so many people are staunchly opposed to such an approach. The good does outweigh the bad. But I guess focusing on the bad better serves the agenda of many of MESO's critiques.

It's not opposition ,,,just an idea...which if this board is so uncensored should be free to express right?

 

[Docd187123]

Ummm never asked for a source.. not one...if i did please put that exact quote here

Your OP is the quote

I guess you were all giddy and giggling and shit typing that juvenile response, don't even know why I'm responding to you since your obviously not an adult..Mentally

 

[Millard]

It's not opposition ,,,just an idea...which if this board is so uncensored should be free to express right?

Yes. That post wasn't directed at you.

The following was my response to your idea:

MESO is not interested in promoting the sale of C3 AAS by "approving" or "endorsing" sources using any criteria.

MESO does not believe you should allow any forum admins or close-knit group of moderators or established vets to make these type of decisions for you. There are too many agendas, too many conflicts of interests, too much corruption and insufficient transparency.

Rather than rely on forums/admins/mods to dictate a list of "approved" or "endorsed" sources, MESO would rather create a forum that actively encourages individuals to critically evaluate evidence and make their own decisions based on the uncensored free flow of information.

 

[Dresden]

Your OP is the quote



View attachment 30740

My OP in no way states I'm asking for a source or asking for someone to give me one..... it was an IDEA for screening of sources that want to set up here since ive read so many complaints of bogus sources...i know how to find a source, i'm not new to the internet or life.

 

[Dresden]

Yes. That post wasn't directed at you.

The following was my response to your idea:

Thanks...I was just throwing an idea out there nothing more

 

[Docd187123]

My OP in no way states I'm asking for a source or asking for someone to give me one..... it was an IDEA for screening of sources that want to set up here since ive read so many complaints of bogus sources...i know how to find a source, i'm not new to the internet or life.

You've been told by the owner of this forum as well as several members this isn't a source board regardless of the fact sources abuse the Uncensored policy. Yet you insist on trying to let sources "setup here". One can only assume you're doing this to get a source plain and simple. If you were able to find a source, a decent one, you'd keep quiet about it not make a thread about how to let sources set up here

 

[Millard]

Thanks...I was just throwing an idea out there nothing more

That is the purpose of the forum - to discuss ideas. You post gives us the opportunity to explain why we do the things we do.

 

[Dresden]

You've been told by the owner of this forum as well as several members this isn't a source board regardless of the fact sources abuse the Uncensored policy. Yet you insist on trying to let sources "setup here". One can only assume you're doing this to get a source plain and simple. If you were able to find a source, a decent one, you'd keep quiet about it not make a thread about how to let sources set up here

Oh Boy...i see this will go in circles with you especially so lets stop here..

 

[Switcher]

Why not just embrace the culture that exists and learn about it before believing it needs improvement? Why join up and assume your ideas are better from the get-go? Spend some time visiting the forum, posting, and learning. Really though, don't get into a tit-for-tat with people, it will make your visits less than enjoyable.

 

[Docd187123]

Oh Boy...i see this will go in circles with you especially so lets stop here..

Giggity giggity. I can accept when someone realizes they're wrong!

 

[Dresden]

Why not just embrace the culture that exists and learn about it before believing it needs improvement? Why join up and assume your ideas are better from the get-go? Spend some time visiting the forum, posting, and learning. Really though, don't get into a tit-for-tat with people, it will make your visits less than enjoyable.

NEVER said i had a better idea...i was just an idea

 

[grey]

i was just an idea

I get the idea but the fatal flaws are (as others have pointed out):

1. Letting the source send his selection in for testing. 1 vial or 50, they will only send from their legit stock. Selective scamming is rampant. Letting sources control their own testing is 100% sure-fire way to invalidate said testing.

(Like having UGLs post videos of them labmaxing their own stuff, who gives a shit? All it means is that they had a gram of legit powder once)

2. The sources then have to arrange financial transfers to the owners of this board. I'll let the legal implications of multiple drug dealers sending cash to a steroid forum's owner as an exercise for the reader.

3. Once Millard becomes the "gatekeeper" for which sources are allowed to protest the perception of favoritism is instant. Any source who is "denied" will instantly be posting everywhere that Millard was paid off by their rivals. Any source who "passes" will also be suspected of paying to play.

Note that Millard can be 100% impartial and ethical in the scenarios above but it wouldn't matter one whit. The incentivization itself is simply impossible to overcome. It will always taint either the results or the perception of those results.

 

[Dresden]

I get the idea but the fatal flaws are (as others have pointed out):

1. Letting the source send his selection in for testing. 1 vial or 50, they will only send from their legit stock. Selective scamming is rampant. Letting sources control their own testing is 100% sure-fire way to invalidate said testing.

(Like having UGLs post videos of them labmaxing their own stuff, who gives a shit? All it means is that they had a gram of legit powder once)

2. The sources then have to arrange financial transfers to the owners of this board. I'll let the legal implications of multiple drug dealers sending cash to a steroid forum's owner as an exercise for the reader.

3. Once Millard becomes the "gatekeeper" for which sources are allowed to protest the perception of favoritism is instant. Any source who is "denied" will instantly be posting everywhere that Millard was paid off by their rivals. Any source who "passes" will also be suspected of paying to play.

Note that Millard can be 100% impartial and ethical in the scenarios above but it wouldn't matter one whit. The incentivization itself is simply impossible to overcome. It will always taint either the results or the perception of those results.

Ok...I wanna thank You, Millard, RedRum, and Mindless for the discourse...I have learned quite a bit

 

[boxcar]

This debate has been going on for a very long time. Meso is non sponsored and also uncensored. Anyone is welcome to come and post freely. This also allows for the members to also control what is said and done. It's a 50/50 side IMO

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

This debate has been going on for a very long time. Meso is non sponsored and also uncensored. Anyone is welcome to come and post freely. This also allows for the members to also control what is said and done. It's a 50/50 side IMO

Stay in your own thread and mind your business. This doesn't concern you.

 

[squirrel619]

I am new to the site as of Friday since then I have reading a ton of the threads in the forums and learned a little bit. This type of thread is new to me with that said what are the rules? my little intro name is squirrel, from the central east coast. my goal is to learn the what, where and how on things. hope to hear some positive feedback and hopefully I don't get one of the famous MESO welcome aboard for a shitty intro.

thxs,
Squirrel
0311/0369