HDL Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Incident Cardiovascular Events
A low level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a major independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, in randomized, controlled trials, high-dose niacin or inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein did not improve cardiovascular outcomes despite significantly increasing the HDL cholesterol level.
Furthermore, genetic variants associated with HDL cholesterol levels are often not associated with cardiovascular disease. These observations suggest that HDL cholesterol may not be causally associated with cardiovascular disease, and they highlight the potential limitations of using the HDL cholesterol level to assess risk or responses to therapies targeted at HDL cholesterol.
HDL has numerous antiatherosclerotic actions that are not readily reflected by HDL cholesterol levels. A key function of HDL is to promote reverse cholesterol transport from the periphery to the liver, and the critical initial step in reverse cholesterol transport is cholesterol efflux from macrophages to HDL. Macrophage-specific cholesterol efflux capacity has been directly and causally linked to the prevention of atherosclerosis in animal models.
The ability to assess the clinical relevance of reverse cholesterol transport in humans has been limited thus far. Recently, however, strategies to measure cholesterol efflux capacity have been used successfully in clinical studies, revealing inverse correlations between cholesterol efflux capacity and prevalent coronary artery disease, independently of the HDL cholesterol level.
It is not known whether cholesterol efflux capacity is associated with incident cardiovascular events (i.e., events occurring after time of sample collection) in unselected persons from the population. It is also not known whether sex, race, adiposity, relative insulin sensitivity or resistance, or inflammation influences cholesterol efflux capacity.
In a large, unselected, probability-based population cohort free from clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline, we investigated the epidemiology of cholesterol efflux capacity and evaluated the association of cholesterol efflux capacity with incident cardiovascular outcomes.
In this study, we found that a functional property of HDL, namely cholesterol efflux capacity, was inversely associated with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a population-based cohort free from cardiovascular disease at baseline.
This association persisted after multivariate adjustment, suggesting that HDL function is associated with cardiovascular risk by means of processes distinct from those reflected by the HDL cholesterol level, HDL particle concentration, or traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
Rohatgi A, Khera A, Berry JD, et al. HDL Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Incident Cardiovascular Events. New England Journal of Medicine. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1409065
BACKGROUND - It is unclear whether high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration plays a causal role in atherosclerosis. A more important factor may be HDL cholesterol efflux capacity, the ability of HDL to accept cholesterol from macrophages, which is a key step in reverse cholesterol transport. We investigated the epidemiology of cholesterol efflux capacity and its association with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes in a large, multiethnic population cohort.
METHODS - We measured HDL cholesterol level, HDL particle concentration, and cholesterol efflux capacity at baseline in 2924 adults free from cardiovascular disease who were participants in the Dallas Heart Study, a probability-based population sample. The primary end point was atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, defined as a first nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization or death from cardiovascular causes. The median follow-up period was 9.4 years.
RESULTS - In contrast to HDL cholesterol level, which was associated with multiple traditional risk factors and metabolic variables, cholesterol efflux capacity had minimal association with these factors. Baseline HDL cholesterol level was not associated with cardiovascular events in an adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 1.99).
In a fully adjusted model that included traditional risk factors, HDL cholesterol level, and HDL particle concentration, there was a 67% reduction in cardiovascular risk in the highest quartile of cholesterol efflux capacity versus the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.55).
Adding cholesterol efflux capacity to traditional risk factors was associated with improvement in discrimination and reclassification indexes.
CONCLUSIONS - Cholesterol efflux capacity, a new biomarker that characterizes a key step in reverse cholesterol transport, was inversely associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events in a population-based cohort.