Anyone else about sick to fucking death of the term "social distancing"?

[notdeadYET]

What's derailed about it?

How do I say this? It's not the content. It's you, your 644789 handles, and your delivery. Within 30 seconds most anyone can recognize your new handle. Once I realize its you, I lose interest in reading whatever it is you're adding to your manifesto.

But it's whatever. Keep doing you.

 

[juicy122]

How do I say this? It's not the content. It's you, your 644789 handles, and your delivery. Within 30 seconds most anyone can recognize your new handle. Once I realize its you, I lose interest in reading whatever it is you're adding to your manifesto.

But it's whatever. Keep doing you.

whos his other handles? and im jw what happend to sworder? that guy was here 24/7 lol

 

[Villain]

whos his other handles? and im jw what happend to sworder? that guy was here 24/7 lol

He got banned because he had the balls to mouth off to MB and challenge him. He just returned from a ban and then thought he could smart off to MB.

 

[notdeadYET]

whos his other handles? and im jw what happend to sworder? that guy was here 24/7 lol

@zepp @martino @Yakov are a few. I lost track.

 

[Yakov]

I've never engage in personal attacks, I might criticize the message, but I don't get caught up in who's posting as the name doesn't matter, just content. Never messed with MB either.

 

[Yakov]

@zepp @martino @Yakov are a few. I lost track.

I lost track as well.

 

[flenser]

I've never engage in personal attacks, I might criticize the message, but I don't get caught up in who's posting as the name doesn't matter, just content. Never messed with MB either.

For a while there you were psychoanalyzing anyone who responded to you, and your diagnoses were mostly insults aimed at anyone who disagreed with you. I would call those personal attacks.

 

[flenser]

Haha!

Scientist Whose Doomsday Models Sparked Global Lockdown Resigns After Breaking Quarantine To Bang Married Lover

 

[Yakov]

For a while there you were psychoanalyzing anyone who responded to you, and your diagnoses were mostly insults aimed at anyone who disagreed with you. I would call those personal attacks.

Can you point to actual personal attacks where I typed a members name in my post and not just a reply with their name in it.

I don't usually use others names, I read the post and then I gently lovingly tear it apart.

 

[flenser]

Can you point to actual personal attacks where I typed a members name in my post and not just a reply with their name in it.

I don't usually use others names, I read the post and then I gently lovingly tear it apart.

What does using their name mater? You click reply and then use "you" to refer to your target. Anyway, I'm not motivated enough to go look for the thread where you started that, funny as the responses were at the time. I'm sure plenty of people remember you doing it.

 

[RoidmeDangerfield]

[emoji1787] snopes as a reference.

Ok, use some common sense here and let’s look at this. For arguments sake let’s say you’re right and Washington was benevolent and PAID 9 slaves for teeth. Of what value would that be for the slaves? What did he pay them with? They had no money. And any material possession was likely taken away from them. Would it have been “if you donate a tooth you won’t get beaten this week and this week alone.”

So just based on THINKING alone, there’s no way he “purchased” the teeth. History doesn’t portray all of the horrible details surrounding slavery. Slaves were likely viewed no differently than farm animals. Not America’s proudest moment in time.

Oh, common sense? You know for a fact that slaves never got paid?

Here's a link from from historyextra.com which is an affiliate site of bbc.com. It clearly states that at times slaves were able to earn money in a variety of ways.

Slave labour

 

[Yakov]

What does using their name mater? You click reply and then use "you" to refer to your target. Anyway, I'm not motivated enough to go look for the thread where you started that, funny as the responses were at the time. I'm sure plenty of people remember you doing it.

Sure I reply, but that wasn't a personal attack. If we consider information is stored in neurons, but isn't a physical part of your body made up of matter, then I can't really attack you, just what is temporarily stored in your neurons that could easily be wiped out with a hammer to the head.

 

[Villain]

What does using their name mater? You click reply and then use "you" to refer to your target. Anyway, I'm not motivated enough to go look for the thread where you started that, funny as the responses were at the time. I'm sure plenty of people remember you doing it.

You sure you’re not referring to NorthMich?

 

[flenser]

Sure I reply, but that wasn't a personal attack. If we consider information is stored in neurons, but isn't a physical part of your body made up of matter, then I can't really attack you, just what is temporarily stored in your neurons that could easily be wiped out with a hammer to the head.

And using their names would change this how?

Anyway, I don't think the term personal attack fits your definition. It does, however, fit your mode of argument.

personal-attack. Noun. (plural personal attacks) Making of an abusive remark on or relating to one's person instead of providing evidence when examining another person's claims or comments.

 

[flenser]

You sure you’re not referring to NorthMich?

Yeah, I'm sure. NorthMich is not a troll. Misguided, maybe, but not a troll.

 

[Yakov]

And using their names would change this how?

Anyway, I don't think the term personal attack fits your definition. It does, however, fit your mode of argument.

personal-attack. Noun. (plural personal attacks) Making of an abusive remark on or relating to one's person instead of providing evidence when examining another person's claims or comments.

I don't use abusive remarks.

As for evidence:
The late great Hitchens: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

 

[flenser]

I don't use abusive remarks.

As for evidence:
The late great Hitchens: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

While I agree with Hitchens, your assertion isn't supported by his words, and is therefore easily dismissed.

 

[Villain]

Yeah, I'm sure. NorthMich is not a troll. Misguided, maybe, but not a troll.

Lol, you sure about that too?

 

[Joe Morgan]

Probably one of the best examples of the dark souls of LE is this video of a Colorado lady that was arrested for smoking while walking her dog without a leash. She refused to sign the ticket, they arrested her, one thing led to another they claimed she said she was gonna commit suicide which this was never caught on video and they proceeded to work their sadism on her, putting her in a chair, chocking her, shocking her. This is the video that made my blood boil, I really wanted to jump through the screen and punch everyone of these motherfuckers out.

It's been said that typically the poor, those that are on the fringes of society are usually the victims of LE, but that's not the case anymore, the middle class are finding they to are the targets of these thugs as well.

if you want to boil your blood some more check out this video below.

Law enforcement who are suppose to be held up to the highest standards and praised by most Americans as securing their freedoms and safety? what a fucking joke. I am done with this government and all its officials. they all need to be held accountable for their actions.

 

[Joe Morgan]

Yeah, I'm sure. NorthMich is not a troll. Misguided, maybe, but not a troll.

He dodges questions. he’s too much of a yellow belly to answer. (I got the term yellow belly from back to the future part III in case you’re wondering lol)