readalot
Member
why people aren't taking serious.
Huh, didn't know that was the case. Plenty of people taking me serious based on relevant data I've collected.
Your not here to learn
Disagree. Learn?
Your not doing anything for harm reduction with your post
Disagree. I've provided a huge amount of information to help educate the consumer.
Why don't you purchase the necessary test and send it to Janoshik if your that concern with it.
I see from this comment you haven't been following along. I get it, it's complex material.
Even @janoshik doesn't have the appropriate equipment to properly screen UGL gear for residual solvents. I'm hopeful that will change with enough interest.
I'll give kudos to @Axle Labs for apparently sending in a raw sample for ICP analysis. Great start.
If @Chromate is wise he will leverage this opportunity. The business case isn't hard to construct.
My hypothesis: any source who goes to the effort of embracing steps 1 through 4 above will have distinct competitive advantage in this space with discriminating consumers.
"Metals testing" haha (see bold below)
1. HPLC quantitative
2. Structural Impurities (GCMS)
3. Residual Solvents (GCMS)
4. Metals (ICP MS/OES, etc)
Last edited: