Literally makes no sense to look at your forum/website/whatever to see if a source is g2g when we have our own shit that’s pretty thorough and doesn’t run the risk of trusting a useless third party for no reason... just sayin.
No one cares about SST. If they’re not willing to come here and face the gauntlet, they’re not worth anyone’s BTC IMO.
Any source on right now has been approved with our before-mentioned expectations of our vendor application process. I understand that some sources, such as Apexa, are not on meso and only on SST and other boards, but they pass the check for us with our askings. Why they are not here, I have no idea.
Some people simply don't wish to grow.
As a source, I know a ton of sources who I ask why are they not on Meso (the largest anabolic forum thus far) and they're afraid of the apparent growth it would provide, they like to stick to smaller forums like the rest and minimize their danger. They think the same of Brewly, for now. I know a few source on Brewly have mentioned that if Brewly begins to blow up, they might not stick around. And its understandable.
@bigdeadweight Thanks for the write up, and honestly, very good points to make.
1) I understand that because I back this project, it has an inherent conflict of interest. At first, the remedy to this issue was to stay quiet about my involvement, but I wanted to be upfront about it because something beginning with a lie is just doomed from the start. I have no reason though, to ban anyone who does not buy from me, as I'd like to see the platform flourish and eventually, take my cut. Would I prefer to see my own clients grow? Yes, of course, but others growing still means profit for me, and perhaps easier profit as I don't have to deal with them as much as I do as their supplier.
2) How do we stop review fraud?
You're right, even Amazon can't, but I believe thats due to the sheer size of fraud going on. We'd be a much smaller platform. We have lots of ideas that we've mentioned previously on how to combat this, but I've also mentioned that minimum requirements for users to perhaps leave reviews should be 2+ purchases. Or place users with higher buying power on higher review scale, such as those who have been on the platform longer + buying. Theres tons of ideas floating around, and we're currently testing and theorizing each one.
3) Our top vendor rankings are due to sales, its pretty organic right now.
4) Not sure i understand this gtg discount thing. When we had site wide promos, of course, we send a message to every source to please consider promotions. At the end of the day, we do not have the power to force a source to accept a 10% loss in coupons, and only some wanted to go ahead with the idea.
5)I posted on the brewly account in the very first days myself. I also wrote the draft for the introduction post. Eventually, I wanted to also make it clear that I back this project, as I know new comers here will not see my name. Are you asking whos the face? We are all technically the face. I couldn't for the life of me answer IT related questions, so I'd need Brewly's help in this. You guys would obliterate my asshole lmao.
6) No reviews were posted for this vendor. We'd restore reviews if a vendor does that kinda stuff.
7) Forums has moderation, as in, moderation against selling other drugs, posting bad things, asking questions about meth, etc. But its pretty unmoderated in all other sense. Theres also moderation for going against the category of the subforums, ieg, posting about your wife's dog and how he died in the section of drug use and testing.
8) I'd leave any security questions ultimately for
@Brewly as he's top knotch in that sort of thing. As for LE involvement, we have and know what products cannot, absolutely cannot, be sold on our site, due to LE interests. Such as DNP. That will never be sold on Brewly.
9) Do domestic sources ever offer a reshipment policy? I mean, if something is wrong with your order, all domestic sources I know will reship, or compensate you in some way. I understand the sentiment, but I think reshipment policies only affect international sources such as me, which many already do have that
Again, thank you for your interest in the project, and I really appreciate the critique and doubts and likes of it. I understand your concern about waiting and not wanting to be part of the early adoption process, its understandable.
