This has already been dealt with and I've even gone in-depth about how our intentions have evolved regarding our initial filter/vetting, community vetting, and ranking based on objective measures.
I believe you're not interested in discussing those things because as you said, you came here with your mind already made up that this is a bad idea.
Meanwhile some sources on here have actual, public data leaks. Some have repeatedly bad testing. And no bans are issued, no affected customers are compensated, etc.
You guys may call this deflection, but I call it a problem asking to be solved. And I don't think solving that problem is a bad idea.
If you have any outstanding issues with our attempt to solve that problem, let me know and we'll continue to work on it.