CCUSA
Subscriber
Thank you for the honest response and its one I respect very much, hints i tried to basically say this same thing in a post above.You want the vets opinion on if it’s okay to send out untested gear? You’re an educated guy and I’m sure you know my answer.
There is a lot that makes this a terrible idea. For starters, it’s as if we took one step forward and two steps backwards. This place has worked hard to be a harm reduction board and @Liska you've contributed a lot to that this past year or so. I understand that the gear will eventually get tested but it will do so after it’s already in a lot of members bodies. If/when it comes back underdosed or test to be something entirely different than what it was thought to be you guys are getting the pitchforks. Everything you worked towards with all your testing is gone like a fart in the wind. You know the saying around here… you are only as good as your last test.
If the door is cracked open for untested gear being sent that door would eventually be wide open.
There’s no doubt this would be an issue. Sure, members may agree to accept untested gear but they would be doing so thinking that the product will hit its mark or be close to it. When the testing shows that’s not the case there will be a shit storm. It’s asking for trouble.
Also, your U.S domestic guy is probably Meso’s newest source. He coasted right in under your coattail. He simply hasn’t done enough or been around long enough that the question should even be asked.
Anywho, I could go on but you get the idea. I don’t believe you’ll get a different reply from any vet here.
I like the door cracked open analogy too, because that is exactly what it is.
I am the new guy, here. I am only as good as my last tested batch and I understand that.
Thanks,
CCUSA
Last edited: