Rido
Subscriber
I have to say I am pretty sure measuring e2 on an anemic patient wasn't a priority. Estradiol would be part of a study to evaluate efficacy of a drug.You’re right ! I am using anecdotes. Well, as I previously noted, there are plenty of studies on Primobolan but not at the dosages we use so it’s not fair for me to say my argument is rooted in science, exactly.
I base my argument off 2 considerations: 1) the actual studies in Primobolan did not show any impact on estrogen and 2) people have been running Primobolan incredibly high for over 50 fucking years man. Back in the 80’s if you weren’t running your primo at 1500 mg you weren’t running primo at all and nobody was running test dosages to match . Shit, I’ve seen dosages exceeding 3 grams! People weren’t oblivious to blood work either. So 50 years of people blasting primo to the high heavens and nobody experienced crashed E2? Explain that!
At any rate, I don’t want to bog down GL thread with this topic. It is a good discussion though and I’m glad we were able to have it without personal attacks. My next run of primo will be 600 with 250 test and I’ll get bloods. If my estrogen is lowered, I’ll stand corrected.
Also, how many people would be active in monitoring e2 values? How often do we see blood work from the 80s?