I was asked a similar question a while back after I posted my doubts about the reliability and accuracy of those "Mass Specs" Angus was performing. The comment was: what do we do then "bc some data is better than no data", and to that I replied NOT IF IT'S WRONG DATA!
The fact is, many more people developed a false sense of security BECAUSE Angus posted assays than would have occurred in their absence! The net effect was more rather than fewer, mates were scammed as a result of WRONG DATA and LM is no different IMO.
I mean how many mates have already made the statement "it's Hammer time" bc of a SINGLE "good" LM test. Anyone on this thread believe "Hammer labs" is not aware many Meso mates consider LM the holy grail of independent AAS testing? Gosh guys I sincerely hope not!
We are talking about UGLs here and if you throw caution to the wind it will come back to bite you I PROMISE!
Last edited:
