@Millard
Either your reading comprehension is rather poor, or your ego is getting in the way...maybe both.
1. Test Subject's statement is 100% true. He didn't say Napsgear
never faced consequences; he said his spamming was allowed to transpire for months with no consquences. This is a true statement.
Now, did you
eventually take action? Yes, after months of concerned members begging you to look at the evidence of fraudulent/duplicate reviews. I am not here to judge your decision-making process; i'm sure running this site isnt easy, but there was
0 misinformation in Test_Subject's post.
2. Liska's cat gland post was overtly sarcastic/cheeky, but I suspect you suffer from a bit of irony deficiency.