How does this LIGHT DNP cycle look?

kilsong

Member
10+ Year Member
This is my first DNP cycle. Have 50 mg DNP caps on hand.
Currently on Tren Ace 75mg EOD and Test 150mg per week.

Age:46
Height: 6'4
Weight: 255 lbs
Unknown bodyfat %--but below 15% but I'm in shape with medium visual abs.
Extremely vascular.

I know everybody says to start at 200mg per day to assess tolerance, but I'm starting at 100mg.

Day 1-100mg
Day 2-100mg
Day 3-100mg

IF its I haven't had an allergic reaction, day 4 forward looks as follows:

Day 4-200mg
Day 5-200mg
Day 6-200mg

IF all is bearable, day 7 forward will look as follows:

Day 7-300mg
Day 8-300mg
Day 9-300mg
Day 10-300mg

Perhaps-300 or even 400 mg for an additional 3-5 days.

I'll be applying standard precautions with supplements and high water intake.

Suggestions? Comments? Concerns?
 
DNP is for those wanting a short cut to fat loss.

No different than people using t3, clenbuterol, or any other compound to help with fat-loss. The only difference is that this particular drug blows those others out of the water in terms of efficacy, albeit with far more risk (although I think the effects on the heart from running AAS with supra physiological doses of t3 and clen can be pretty devastating too.)

This argument borders on the absurd. People will say DNP is for lazy fucks and in the same sentence say you only 'need' t3, clen or whatever else to get shredded. None of us actually 'needs' any of that shit to get shredded, you can call it whatever you like but if DNP is a short cut then so are all those other fat loss drugs that we indulge in, the difference is one works a lot better.

And 99.9% on this site who don't compete have no reason to fuk with this.

I could use this argument for AAS or any other performance enhancing compound.

I have absolutely ZERO interest in DNP but it's a shame every thread on the subject de-evolves into these pedantic arguments that border on the absurd. If you want to argue against the use of DNP because of it's associated risks then the thread with CBS, Doc, and Ripped is worth reading. Aside from that most of the other DNP threads are the usual 'lazy fuck, u only need tren t3 clen gh etc to get shreddored' shit. Make better arguments, this is Meso.
 
Last edited:
Yeah they use it so they don't have to diet or add extra cardio. DNP is for those wanting a short cut to fat loss. And 99.9% on this site who don't compete have no reason to fuk with this. So take your little bitch ass and fuk off. By the way the first part of your post pertained to what exactly. Where was I ever excluding hard work. So again fuk off.
You are a little bitch. Why don't you research a little and read then comment or stay out of threads you know absolutely nothing about.

Duchebags like you are a dime a dozen so how about YOU fuck off.

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
 
No different than people using t3, clenbuterol, or any other compound to help with fat-loss. The only difference is that this particular drug blows those others out of the water in terms of efficacy, albeit with far more risk (although I think the effects on the heart from running AAS with supra physiological doses of t3 and clen can be pretty devastating too.)

This argument borders on the absurd. People will say DNP is for lazy fucks and in the same sentence say you only 'need' t3, clen or whatever else to get shredded. None of us actually 'needs' any of that shit to get shredded, you can call it whatever you like but if DNP is a short cut then so are all those other fat loss drugs that we indulge in, the difference is one works a lot better.



I could use this argument for AAS or any other performance enhancing compound.

I have absolutely ZERO interest in DNP but it's a shame every thread on the subject de-evolves into these pedantic arguments that border on the absurd. If you want to argue against the use of DNP because of it's associated risks then the thread with CBS, Doc, and Ripped is worth reading. Aside from that most of the other DNP threads are the usual 'lazy fuck' and 'you gon die bro' shit. Make better arguments, this is Meso.
True. But your going to tell me you consider DNP use as safe as AAS use. Because if so we strongly disagree. Do any of us need to use any of these? Of course not. And I am so against DNP for a good personal reason. So DNP use is especially evil to me.
 
You are a little bitch. Why don't you research a little and read then comment or stay out of threads you know absolutely nothing about.

Duchebags like you are a dime a dozen so how about YOU fuck off.

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
I saw that you replied but forgot to read it. I'm sure it was good though. Nice profile pic.
 
But your going to tell me you consider DNP use as safe as AAS use.

I never once made a statement saying they are comparable when it comes to safety. In fact, I even highlighted the fact DNP has greater risks.

Your admonishing people who use DNP because you claim they are seeking a short cut to fat loss, which is essentially what ever other fat loss drug or PED is providing. How is it any different than an athlete (ab)using t3, or clen for increased fat loss aside from the risk profile and the fact DNP works better?

If you want to argue against DNP due to safety / risk, fine, do that. But these arguments don't hold water because they can be applied to many other drugs as well that we all use.
 
True. But your going to tell me you consider DNP use as safe as AAS use. Because if so we strongly disagree. Do any of us need to use any of these? Of course not. And I am so against DNP for a good personal reason. So DNP use is especially evil to me.
You clearly didn't read what weighted chinup posted... how about you go and read about the basics first... so you understand the difference between AAS, thermogenics, etc. Because you have no fucking idea!

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
 
I never once made a statement saying they are comparable when it comes to safety. In fact, I even highlighted the fact DNP has greater risks.

Your admonishing people who use DNP because you claim they are seeking a short cut to fat loss, which is essentially what ever other fat loss drug or PED is providing. How is it any different than an athlete (ab)using t3, or clen for increased fat loss aside from the risk profile and the fact DNP works better?

If you want to argue against DNP due to safety / risk, fine, do that. But these arguments don't hold water because they can be applied to many other drugs as well that we all use.
Completely agree. All that we use has a risk reward ratio. I just had to stop use because of heart surgery last week. My one point is like you stated. The risk and safety factor. If you screw up DNP you are in a world of hurt.
 
Yeah they use it so they don't have to diet or add extra cardio. DNP is for those wanting a short cut to fat loss. And 99.9% on this site who don't compete have no reason to fuk with this. So take your little bitch ass and fuk off. By the way the first part of your post pertained to what exactly. Where was I ever excluding hard work. So again fuk off.

It truly is ironic you think people want to use DNP so they don't have to diet or do cardio yet the vast majority of the people who come to RipedZilla and I regarding advice on DNP have to be told to do LESS cardio and less extreme calorie deficits.

It's also ironic you would still advocate AAS use considering your recent health crisis and while AAS may not have been the primary cause, it certainly played an effect and didn't help your situation.
 
It truly is ironic you think people want to use DNP so they don't have to diet or do cardio yet the vast majority of the people who come to RipedZilla and I regarding advice on DNP have to be told to do LESS cardio and less extreme calorie deficits.

It's also ironic you would still advocate AAS use considering your recent health crisis and while AAS may not have been the primary cause, it certainly played an effect and didn't help your situation.
No where have I advocated its use. I don't tell someone to take or not take AAS. People on this site will do what they want. I would hope others would take heed with what I've recently gone through, but you and I know that won't happen. And like my doctors said AAS use may or may not have had anything to do with it. No doubt AAS use is dangerous. We can all agree on that. But DNP use is on a different level. You and I both know that. And I'm glad I have such a strong opinion on DNP. My cousin was on his 3rd day of use and was rushed to the hospital because of it. So yes maybe I don't subjectively look at it because its personal to me. I would still never condone it though.
 
No where have I advocated its use. I don't tell someone to take or not take AAS. People on this site will do what they want. I would hope others would take heed with what I've recently gone through, but you and I know that won't happen. And like my doctors said AAS use may or may not have had anything to do with it. No doubt AAS use is dangerous. We can all agree on that. But DNP use is on a different level. You and I both know that. And I'm glad I have such a strong opinion on DNP. My cousin was on his 3rd day of use and was rushed to the hospital because of it. So yes maybe I don't subjectively look at it because its personal to me. I would still never condone it though.

But you've advised and would continue to advise someone who wants to take AAS on how to do so to mitigate the associated risks? That's the same we're doing with DNP which needs more caution. Nobody told anyone "hey you need to take DNP". We just try to educate those who have chosen it for themselves.
 
Back
Top