And everybody and there mother used to smoke before the research told us it can cause cancer. Nobody used airbags or seatbelts until the stupid research told them they could help save lives. Nobody was taking an antibiotic when they got infections until that stupid research told us it could kill the bacteria. So what exactly is your point about AI use then vs now? That we know better now? Bc that's clearly evident to most.
The research doesn't say protein is bad for kidneys. The research says those with kidney issues can be better off with a reduced protein intake and then some idiot took that to mean protein is bad for the kidneys. So instead of blaming the messenger who is at fault you discount the message which is your right to do so but had the human race done that enough times throughout history we'd still be living with the Black Death in midevil times, not driving cars to go down the street to the corner store.....
Nowhere am I saying you're stupid. I have not said that once anywhere. What I am saying is you're too biased and myopic to see the difference between research being applied correctly and research being applied incorrectly.
Relying on bro science aka anecdotes aka glorified story time is the joke. In the absence of more compelling and objective evidence it can have a place to be discussed but it proves nothing in the end whether you care to admit that or not.
lol everyone knew smoking was bad for you. we didn't need research to tell people that. smoking didn't become big until after WW1 and WW2.
I never said you said I was stupid.
I just see the medical field going backwards instead of forward like it should be. like cancer research. that is the biggest fucking joke of them all. no one wants to touch PEDS or anything that will actually benefit your health. no money in healthy people, but loads of money in keeping people sick.
the seat belt safety is a joke too. you have a 60/40 chance of living with a seat belt on, just a hair above 50%.