Holy fucking shit show, fellas. I'm not touching the jano crap, waste of time. I'm conflicted by people I trust taking positions that are hard to rationalize. Aside from that giant pile of back and forth nonsense, one question remains:
Why can nobody do this right just once? Have you seen what Millard Baker did with anaboliclab.com? Have you noticed how well designed the collection methodology is? Why can't anyone pull this off with GH? I know the testing is more complex, but the product is significantly more expensive too. The incentive is huge to the community. There are only about 3-4 generic brands worth testing anyway. Instead of something like that, we get flawed collection techniques (uncontrolled sample sourcing), errors, inconsistency, controversy and never ending bullshit banter. Zero cooperation. I'm speaking about tests here and at PM, so it's not a meso critique only (I too donated money for PM tests, I think the sample collection was way too loose personally and the results seemed almost too good). No effort has been made on par to what Millard has done in my opinion.
When is a savior going to come along who can properly test a pharma control and 2-3 generics, plucked from the supply chain anonymously? I really appreciate what Mands and Jim attempted to do here but there are still unanswered issues with the results and no control sample data. If it's so cut and dry why was that never done. It silences all questions. Why can't anyone do this shit right? I'm neutral, all I want is legit generic gh. I have no incentive other than that. No allegiances. But I think we can all agree there are some inconsistencies across the board and this shit has never been pulled off right.
I'll fucking throw large bills at the first attempt that promises to do it correctly. Why can't Millard raise money for a gh effort, take on 2-3 gh samples then be done?
@millard, I know you're listening!