janoshik
Subscriber
Asking loaded questions is generally not very polite, and it is unarguable it indeed was a loaded question. The narrative itself we considered insulting as well, but let's leave that be.I dont see how it was an insult. The owner of neauvotrope sent in a sample of his own GH, and @3ml would like to know more info about that. He believes you may have doctored the results by being paid off by Taureau. He asked a simple question, that is all and its a fair question.
I give you the benefit of the doubt. I believe Taureau put real gh in a vial, slapped on a neauvo label and sent it to you. But he then continues to sell peptides as neauvo. Just strange that a few guys scored low serum and IGF tests awhile back but all of a sudden we have 10iu in a vial. I highly doubt that when you have the owner of the lab sending you test samples. Hopefully my post wasn't insulting, and you can answer.
Thank you for very civil reply and question, Sir.
We have not doctored the results.
If we were doctoring the results upon request, we believe it would have blown over the years - especially with us having hundreds of different customers. Wouldn't you agree?
It is absolutely possible that we have been sent a sample different from the product sold - we have absolutely no way of determining that and have never claimed we do.
However, all users do indeed have a way of determining if either the report or the sample sent were improper by simply sending a sample for testing themselves.
We believe that there are no unique identifying markers (such as batch # on meditropes) on Nouveautrope, so we can't see our judgement being influenced by being able to identify the sample, especially if vial is sent without the top (as most of our private customers send the HGH vials without it to prevent any bias).
If you are interested in our opinion, we believe it would be foolish of the source to send off a different sample for the analysis as the source would risk much higher backslash should his customers proceed with having the analysis conducted themselves.
Most of the sources which sell bunk products are either unaware of it or in the worse case when they are aware of it, the last thing they would like to do would be to provide their customers with a test report which includes contact on the service, through which they can verify the genuineness of the product.
According to the website, the cost of a single kit is 375$, so the analysis costs would be less than a single kit making it accessible to the purchasers.