It's a tough call. i've said before that i believe he has the knowledge and equipment to test, but his reputation was destroyed with the Mands GH debacle.
If you're doing it for your own peace of mind, send him blind samples. Number them or something so you know which is which and see what he comes up with.
Of course, you're going to need to have a little trust in his results, which is asking a lot, considering the past, but i suppose that comes down to a personal choice that only you can make.
A word of warning - I might choose to not accept completely blind samples. For example if you want to send oil and " you tell me what it is" I might choose to not accept that kind of work.
But if you number them: 1 2 3 and tell me there's test p, npp and equipoise, but don't tell me which number is which compound, it's
okay. I suggest people don't tell me straight away. Or if you just tell me it's supposed to be one of the very common AAS.
I've been so busy lately that I
sometimes can't afford to waste time screening the sample for all 50 hormones in my database.
Trying to figure out rare stuff, like methyltren, cheque drops or for example lately talked about rare nandrolone esters (Pharmacom testing) takes time which I can use to run several other samples. No commercial laboratory in the world accepts completely blind samples and if they do, it's not quite in the same price range. Please, consider that.
Also, I don't accept anonymous pills at all anymore.
Sorry for that, but such is reality and it's better when it's posted out before any unnecessary confusion happens. I'll be happy to answer questions about this.
Also, I'd like to point out that I believe that there has not been an unhappy actual customer of mine ever.