hotdog23
New Member
Truthfully, I don't know anything about the product. What irks me is the names they come up with. It's like they think we are idiots...well maybe we are because we keep buying this stuff, myself included.
Agreed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Truthfully, I don't know anything about the product. What irks me is the names they come up with. It's like they think we are idiots...well maybe we are because we keep buying this stuff, myself included.
Truthfully, I don't know anything about the product. What irks me is the names they come up with. It's like they think we are idiots...well maybe we are because we keep buying this stuff, myself included.
simply pay the extra money and buy pharma grade
So what were those results?
But it was done an hplc.
By mands and you: results
Anyone can explain what's the concentration in that vial?
Here is the explanation I was given, hopefully mands can confirm:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Muscles96ss - The number 1.36 refers to mg/ml ! - milligram per milliliter - it's a CONCENTRATION, not the total weight !
Based on this CONCENTRATION the calculation for the total weight of active protein is 3.72 milligrams which is close to 11IU
Follow again the explanation which includes this specific calculation from my professor.
And just as u said, all serum tests confirms as well of course the present of the declared amount of milligrams/IUs.
I'll ask again for another clarification from my professor.
BTW - I think that Mands himself confirmed with his team that the vials are 10+ IUs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the vials were mixed in 1ml of testing solution, why would the results be doubled?
I have no idea, thats just the explanation I got and according to Karl mands told him that the vial contained the full 10iu. Mands posted the results on Karl's thread on PM and I highly doubt he would have posted it there(or that Karl would allow it to stay up) if there was anything negative there. Perhaps mands can chime in and clear this up as I don't have a good understanding on how to read these tests.
If the vials were mixed in 1ml of testing solution, why would the results be doubled?
Not many do.I don't have a good understanding on how to read these tests.
Could be the reason he's allowing it. Not many to refute his "professor".Karl would allow it to stay up)
Thanks Doc! LolThe concentrations listed is the MILLIGRAM AMOUNT of GH detected n ONE VIAL, GOT IT!
Try not to make it any more complicated bc that's the bottom line. Once again UGLs are LYING about a PEDs concentration.
Is anyone surprised, God I hope not, lol!
Yes the Vial was a 10 iu vial not a 20 iu vial. I never told Karl that it contained anything more than what the test confirmed.I have no idea, thats just the explanation I got and according to Karl mands told him that the vial contained the full 10iu. Mands posted the results on Karl's thread on PM and I highly doubt he would have posted it there(or that Karl would allow it to stay up) if there was anything negative there. Perhaps mands can chime in and clear this up as I don't have a good understanding on how to read these tests.
Doctor today bud. Going to ask for the perscription.@pmac928 not busting your chop's but it would be nice to see your IGF-1 levels. I know you don't have a baseline but still be nice to see where you are at.