http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0982828004?pc_redir=1405522241&robot_redir=1
This is the one I have.
This is the one I have.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ whodat this is not my area ofv expertise but it does seen from research companies are making portal edition. And some looks like there in the works to build consumer versions. But like I said this is not my area expertise so I could be looking at the wrong machines. Worth a look though.
I saw there Naps had a bunch of gear tested. You have any results or info on how they turned out? That would tell much imo. The red flag 1st off is eroids 2nd a $60 mass spec test? IMO it seems like a great way to grab new desperate buyers attention and money. $60 isn't enough to totally scare you off and low enough to say ''ahh wth , it's worth it'' What Head of Mass Spec testing at a ''REspected University'' would do a test for that? That also means the guys taking your money would be doing it for free or out of the kindness of their hearts.. Yea..OK. Think about it gents. I have no dog in this other than utterly hating scammers
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0982828004?pc_redir=1405522241&robot_redir=1
This is the one I have.
It is unlikely the 5 people will be licensed by the the DEA or other regulatory agency to analyze CS. Why would they risk prosecution for violating AAS /CS laws by receiving 100s of AAS samples per month? Plus you will have dozens of well-funded ugls that will do anything to shut them downThe idea pops into my head of funding the acquisition of say five machines and placed with five chosen people who know how to operate. When something is sent for testing all five testers receive it and when the test are complete if you have a five out of five , you then move forward with your agenda.
Multiple people testing at one time is the key to shutting up the smear campaign. The same data used on each device with the same operating program and then you have something. One guy goes rogue and it is easily figured out
It is unlikely the 5 people will be licensed by the the DEA or other regulatory agency to analyze CS. Why would they risk prosecution for violating AAS /CS laws by receiving 100s of AAS samples per month? Plus you will have dozens of well-funded ugls that will do anything to shut them down
I am only critical because I want this to work. I really think that an independent, established and licensed lab is the only way to go and it may need to be located outside the United States.I love you Millard but damn you deflate ideas so quickly with knowledge and logic. So you believe that this endeavor we are on will take us on the route of using international testing companies so that we can bypass USA regulations ? Once started though the ugl's with there money will start realizing that those pockets aren't so damn long when no one in the community is sending them loads of money for nothing.
I am only critical because I want this to work. I really think that an independent, established and licensed lab is the only way to go and it may need to be located outside the United States.
I knowNot as easy as one might think
Sigh....The problem with what you're presenting vs what I have been saying is that in your example it was legal. It is no longer, it's DEA regulated. When they made it illegal he stopped. Why? The answer to this is my whole point. I agree it's not only a shame but stupid to deny AAS users testing but give crakheads, tweakers and pill poppers access to the same tests. I can absofreakinlutely guarantee NO head of a dept in a university is going to risk a $200,000 plus a year job\benefits not to mention his freedom to help us for a measly 60 bucks a test. Just isn't going to happenThere was an actual American lab that did mass specs on steroids sent to it until the government took away their license to test that level of substance (they required labels to be removed). The lab owner said it was a shame, because in his eyes, he was helping consumers avoid very negative consequences from bad gear. He also felt, people would use the substances anyways, so it was his responsibility as a healthcare professional to provide as much accurate information as possible. That's what kind of respected lab would conduct mass specs for people.
Not saying whoever the 60 dollar lab's person is legit, but you would be surprised at what healthcare people are willing to do, to help those in their charge. Also not to say, that some healthcare professionals aren't willing to take advantage of you either, but both ends of the spectrum do exist.
As for any supplier/retailer who supplies mass specs, be wary. This is why I was drawn to meso, as third party people conducted the tests, and from random orders (retailer had no way of knowing if the gear they sent would be tested). I always take mass specs conducted from supplier/retailer with a grain of salt, it's in their best interest to put a good foot forward.
Sigh....The problem with what you're presenting vs what I have been saying is that in your example it was legal. It is no longer, it's DEA regulated. When they made it illegal he stopped. Why? The answer to this is my whole point. I agree it's not only a shame but stupid to deny AAS users testing but give crakheads, tweakers and pill poppers access to the same tests. I can absofreakinlutely guarantee NO head of a dept in a university is going to risk a $200,000 plus a year job\benefits not to mention his freedom to help us for a measly 60 bucks a test. Just isn't going to happen
I always take anything from eroids and the owner, big sponsors there as a lie.
The "ONE clearing-house" is a problem. Is your friend's lab licensed to receive controlled substances. Can they provide public reports on laboratory letterhead?What is it you men want from a GC/MS lab? I read Cloverleaf and Millards posts.. The lab that does my testing doesnt f**ck around. They have libraries with just about every compound you can imagine. I talked to my friend there and he has expressed great interest in doing these tests as long as they all come from ONE clearing-house. I have my own sources and would never steer you fellas wrong...Sooner or later we have to do this as a GROUP!!! Tecumsah said"One twig will break. A bundle WILL NOT"
This would be done under the classification of "Education and Harm Reduction"
Do you men agree we should act as "a bundle" or be twigs and keep getting hosed?
I just wanna know if the right lab did EXACTLY as we want...WHOS IN??!!!
Goose