For what I have understood with pharma, every time they change something they need to run studies after studies and trials to show it is safe and that's a lot of money for something that... Well why change something that works? I mean the money they make in producing injectables hormones are just a little compared to many other stuff why waste time and money to make that testoviron inject smoother? Or so that the gear head can pin with a 29G instead of a 23?You're making me want to experiment with this too but I have some reservations....
I wonder why pharma does not use mig 840 , the usual answer I found was cost...but that does not make sense as I'm sure if bought in bulk it's cheap considering the overall cost of producing injectables the carrier is a small fraction On top of the fact they have a HUGE margin of profit...
I mean the only application for human use is in creams and lotions.... Only vetenary use for injections...
They don't use MCT either for example etc.
Not saying this mig840 doesn't have maybe something that will fuck me up, I'm just saying that using the logic: why pharma doesn't use it, there must be some flaw hidden it doesn't really work.
It has been reported safe for injection, how safe or in what quantity I wouldn't know.
These are a some meds where miglyol is used, not sure if it's 840 or 812 tho
Narcotics (Propofol)
Malaria (Artemether, Lumefantrin)
Muscle relaxant (Etomidate)
API-loaded microspheres (Exenatide)
Veterinary injection suspension
(Amoxicillin, Ceftiofur)
Follicle Stimulating Hormones (Progesterone)
GnRH Modulator (Triptorelin)
Neuroleptics (Flupenthixol)
Benzodiazepines (Diazepam)
Last edited: