NapsGear.Net - reviews

Damn, so weird about the primo.
So much of their stuff has been rated so well on Anabolic Lab, also seen a good bit of decent bloodwork from GP, I was hopeful that would be a good indication of their stuff, I will try and labmax this oil, I think I might have a few more tests left.
Although, labmax frustrates the shit out of me, I labmaxed a couple different kinds of Test E, Watson Cyp, and EQ a while back I think it was 4 different tests, and I swear, they all looked the same to me, maybe I'm color blind, but labmax drives me nuts.
 
just got order from NAPS, gp primo100 1/2 off sale, tested all vials, don't know whats in them but it AINT methenolone enanthate or anything even close. guess their going in the trash. multiple labmax and roidtest a and b turned consistent crème color, not even on charts. Order and T/A was great. Maybe I shouldn't have waited for the 1/2 off sale.

Lets Hope Anabolic Lab on here will get ahold of some GP Primo and have it HPLC LAB TESTED!!!
 
I have been extremely critical of naps in the past they had great customer service but I thought the gear was underdosed. Since last November when I saw good results from anabolic lab I gave them another shot and have been pleased with the gear. The gp test prop. has been some of the best prop. I have ever run very smooth too. The gp dbol 50 were good too imo as was the phynl prop. I'm cruising on the gp test e. now and it's on point as well. In about 6weeks I'll be starting another long run with a dbol kicker lots of test prop. and eq. so I'll post my findings when the time comes , fingers crossed.
 
Lets Hope Anabolic Lab on here will get ahold of some GP Primo and have it HPLC LAB TESTED!!!
I will not waste my time, I already wasted my money, both tests x2 a and b on 3 separate vials showed the EXACT same result. that was 2 labmax and 2 roidtest kits, both reagent tests. that was 12 tests, also did the same on 3 vials pharmaprim, which DID show presence of an AS, but not definitive for methanonlone enanthate, other possibles were methanolone acetate, or sustanon. I will not be using any of it, as I have no clue what they are, but the gp for sure is most likely plain oil, as those tests turned a crème/whitish color. Im also not confident in a lot of the AL or SIMEC test results, as the lot and batch numbers don't really mean anything. For instance, if you look at ANY of pharmacoms batch #s on simec or al of tested oils, every one has the same 604331, it dosent matter which compound was being tested, test e, test c, primo,nandro, etc. How can this possibly mean ANYTHING
 
I will not waste my time, I already wasted my money, both tests x2 a and b on 3 separate vials showed the EXACT same result. that was 2 labmax and 2 roidtest kits, both reagent tests. that was 12 tests, also did the same on 3 vials pharmaprim, which DID show presence of an AS, but not definitive for methanonlone enanthate, other possibles were methanolone acetate, or sustanon. I will not be using any of it, as I have no clue what they are, but the gp for sure is most likely plain oil, as those tests turned a crème/whitish color. Im also not confident in a lot of the AL or SIMEC test results, as the lot and batch numbers don't really mean anything. For instance, if you look at ANY of pharmacoms batch #s on simec or al of tested oils, every one has the same 604331, it dosent matter which compound was being tested, test e, test c, primo,nandro, etc. How can this possibly mean ANYTHING
not defending naps, but you're full of shit
 
not defending naps, but you're full of shit
no, Im really not full of shit, and its ok if you want to defend naps or not, I don't care, they wont get any more of my money but if you got any of the gp primo @ 1/2 off 3 weeks ago, test it. maybe yours will be good, I hope it is. mine was not. I may be a junior member on this site, but I have been around and used on and off AAS since 1983. I am not ignorant to the business end of them either. maybe you should really READ my last 3 posts, I did not post them to damage reputations as that seems to happen on it own, I posted to convey MY experience. good luck
 
For instance, if you look at ANY of pharmacoms batch #s on simec or al of tested oils, every one has the same 604331, it dosent matter which compound was being tested, test e, test c, primo,nandro, etc. How can this possibly mean ANYTHING

It could mean those compounds were all brewed at the same time and that's how the batches are tracked. 604331 brewed (insert) month...just a guess. I'm definitely not defending. Oh yeah, fuck Naps.
 
It could mean those compounds were all brewed at the same time and that's how the batches are tracked. 604331 brewed (insert) month...just a guess. I'm definitely not defending. Oh yeah, fuck Naps.
that might be plausible if the code had not been the same for the last couple of years or since the last label redesign, they most likely brew new batches of fast moving products every couple of months, also there is no suffix or prefix, just 604331. A true tracking system would go by a batch#, lot#, right down to a date, time, and which inspector was responsible for checking and signing off on that particular run of product. that is called QUALITY CONTROL, extremely important in the pharmaceutical industry.
 
My point is using labmax and than saying you don't trust anaboliclab is bullshit
no, I did not say I don't trust AL or SIMEC, what I said was, the posted results could be from ANY submitted sample, thus the "604331" label is on EVERY single vial of oil I have ever received or saw pictures of, does not IDENTIFY for comparison that particular compound. If that # is how the TESTED compound is identified, and ALL of the oil compounds have THAT # , how is that helpful? all it means is that particular submitted product was tested and the results were whatever they were, it has NOTHING to do with the product that I have in MY possession.
 
LOL! I love it. Don't bother with these guys. Not worth the time of day.

Its clear as day cdnguy, groundfighter and multiple other clowns on this board have a clear agenda. Not even sure why guys even bother posting. Next you'll have clowns coming into thread saying "my dick is bigger than yours take a picture with your forum name beside it", total ass clowns.
 
that might be plausible if the code had not been the same for the last couple of years or since the last label redesign, they most likely brew new batches of fast moving products every couple of months, also there is no suffix or prefix, just 604331. A true tracking system would go by a batch#, lot#, right down to a date, time, and which inspector was responsible for checking and signing off on that particular run of product. that is called QUALITY CONTROL, extremely important in the pharmaceutical industry.

Well...carry on then. Lol
 
Its clear as day cdnguy, groundfighter and multiple other clowns on this board have a clear agenda. Not even sure why guys even bother posting. Next you'll have clowns coming into thread saying "my dick is bigger than yours take a picture with your forum name beside it", total ass clowns.

I have no agenda whatsoever but I'd rather not do business with a source that clearly makes enough money to protect themselves and their customers but CHOOSES not to.
 
I have no agenda whatsoever but I'd rather not do business with a source that clearly makes enough money to protect themselves and their customers but CHOOSES not to.

Not you it's fucking insane the amount of negative posts on a select few "sources" some individuals have here looking at their posting history. Holy shit do these guys actually go to the gym, have girlfriends, or even a job? Or do you just sit here blowing each other with your garbage posts. seems awkward to me.
 
Back
Top