MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

Parmacom Extreme Underdosing...Looking for a rep!

@Seven07 bud you never ever put out such sensitive information in your posts. Please refrain from doing so in the future. I get that you are mad but we just don't do that around here.
 
@Seven07 thank you for removing sensitive info that could hinder others -- it is appreciated.

Seven07 said:
...but the only thing that irritates me is your confidence in pharmacom products...
Click to expand...

You have no reason to be irritated with me -- I could easily say I am irritated with you for thinking your assumptions and one blood work result is enough to prove a HIGHLY reputable and respected brand is selling bunk vials.

Also, as we both know, some people try to rip off sources (they like the gear so much that they want more for free) by claiming something is bad. Reverse scammers, as they are called, are very common.
I am NOT accusing you as all. I believe you that your test levels came back low; however, I do not believe it is because the product was bad.
However, without proof, how can the company do anything? If they were to just send replacements every time someone posts a "low" bloodwork results, then we would start seeing hundreds of poor results as reverse scammers rather take less than what they claim, pay $60 for a blood test, and then get a bunch of free gear.

As for your issue -- I am sorry that you are not happy with the results.
However, I am confident it is NOT because of a poor product.

I am NOT blaming you for anything either -- hear me out -- but it must be a result unique to you or the testing procedure.

Think logically about it -- without being upset please just follow me on this one point:

Pharmacom has THOUSANDS of customers each week and stand to make far more money consistently selling one of the best products than trying to rip off a couple guys.
Each batch has thousands of vials -- vials are filled on an automated assembly line NOT one at a time by hand like some small garage UGLs.
I, like many of us, are present on multiple boards (I am on at least 8 English speaking boards).
If a batch was this severely under-dosed we would all see an outbreak of complaints from hundreds of customers that received that batch.
I see nothing in terms of multiple complaints.

I have not seen anything out of the ordinary in terms of complaints -- one guy on here today or yesterday claimed the tren-e is not working for him (ONE guy among thousands).
But I have seen many positive reviews, anonymous testing results, and good blood results posted.
More importantly, the real data, SIMEC results from AnabolicLab and from anonymous individual private HPLC testing have consistently proven Pharmacom is of the highest quality.

It is extremely unlikely your vial is underdosed.
I am a customer for a long time -- I lift -- I try to stay young (I am middle aged) -- I know it is important to have good gear -- I am your peer and I am genuine in saying that I am sorry you are not happy with the results.

I do not know what other factors could have lead to a poor result.
Personally, I have had the blood lab make a mistake in the past and it was difficult to sort out but I made calls and got to the bottom of it and the lab gave me a new test (I only caught the mistake because I get tested every 2 to 3 months for many years and knew there was no way my blood glucose level would have changed as drastically as the results shown, as if I suddenly became diabetic).

Could the vial have been exposed to any extreme condition that may have degraded the compound? Extreme heat? intense sunlight? Left ion teh car during a HOT summer day?
Hide your stash in the basement at chernobyl? lol

I do not know man, your guess is as good as mine but something is up and I logically know it is not Pharmacom making a handful of special vials just for one or two guys while everyone else gets the thousand good vials from automated production line.

Please take the fact that I just spent a long time writing this huge post as a sign that I respect your concern and that I care brother.
 
Last edited:
RThoads said:
@Seven07 thank you for removing sensitive info that could hinder others -- it is appreciated.



You have no reason to be irritated with me -- I could easily say I am irritated with you for thinking your assumptions and one blood work result is enough to prove a HIGHLY reputable and respected brand is selling bunk vials.

Also, as we both know, some people try to rip off sources (they like the gear so much that they want more for free) by claiming something is bad. Reverse scammers, as they are called, are very common.
I am NOT accusing you as all. I believe you that your test levels came back low; however, I do not believe it is because the product was bad.
However, without proof, how can the company do anything? If they were to just send replacements every time someone posts a "low" bloodwork results, then we would start seeing hundreds of poor results as reverse scammers rather take less than what they claim, pay $60 for a blood test, and then get a bunch of free gear.

As for your issue -- I am sorry that you are not happy with the results.
However, I am confident it is NOT because of a poor product.

I am NOT blaming you for anything either -- hear me out -- but it must be a result unique to you or the testing procedure.

Think logically about it -- without being upset please just follow me on this one point:

Pharmacom has THOUSANDS of customers each week and stand to make far more money consistently selling one of the best products than trying to rip off a couple guys.
Each batch has thousands of vials -- vials are filled on an automated assembly line NOT one at a time by hand like some small garage UGLs.
I, like many of us, are present on multiple boards (I am on at least 8 English speaking boards).
If a batch was this severely under-dosed we would all see an outbreak of complaints from hundreds of customers that received that batch.
I see nothing in terms of multiple complaints.

I have not seen anything out of the ordinary in terms of complaints -- one guy on here today or yesterday claimed the tren-e is not working for him (ONE guy among thousands).
But I have seen many positive reviews, anonymous testing results, and good blood results posted.
More importantly, the real data, SIMEC results from AnabolicLab and from anonymous individual private HPLC testing have consistently proven Pharmacom is of the highest quality.

It is extremely unlikely your vial is underdosed.
I am a customer for a long time -- I lift -- I try to stay young (I am middle aged) -- I know it is important to have good gear -- I am your peer and I am genuine in saying that I am sorry you are not happy with the results.

I do not know what other factors could have lead to a poor result.
Personally, I have had the blood lab make a mistake in the past and it was difficult to sort out but I made calls and got to the bottom of it and the lab gave me a new test (I only caught the mistake because I get tested every 2 to 3 months for many years and knew there was no way my blood glucose level would have changed as drastically as the results shown, as if I suddenly became diabetic).

Could the vial have been exposed to any extreme condition that may have degraded the compound? Extreme heat? intense sunlight? Left ion teh car during a HOT summer day?
Hide your stash in the basement at chernobyl? lol

I do not know man, your guess is as good as mine but something is up and I logically know it is not Pharmacom making a handful of special vials just for one or two guys while everyone else gets the thousand good vials from automated production line.

Please take the fact that I just spent a long time writing this huge post as a sign that I respect your concern and that I care brother.
Click to expand...
from the doubt I ask. Is the anaboliclab website reliable? Some doubt it since it is sponsored by labs under among others by pharmacom
 
RThoads said:
@Seven07 thank you for removing sensitive info that could hinder others -- it is appreciated.



You have no reason to be irritated with me -- I could easily say I am irritated with you for thinking your assumptions and one blood work result is enough to prove a HIGHLY reputable and respected brand is selling bunk vials.

Also, as we both know, some people try to rip off sources (they like the gear so much that they want more for free) by claiming something is bad. Reverse scammers, as they are called, are very common.
I am NOT accusing you as all. I believe you that your test levels came back low; however, I do not believe it is because the product was bad.
However, without proof, how can the company do anything? If they were to just send replacements every time someone posts a "low" bloodwork results, then we would start seeing hundreds of poor results as reverse scammers rather take less than what they claim, pay $60 for a blood test, and then get a bunch of free gear.

As for your issue -- I am sorry that you are not happy with the results.
However, I am confident it is NOT because of a poor product.

I am NOT blaming you for anything either -- hear me out -- but it must be a result unique to you or the testing procedure.

Think logically about it -- without being upset please just follow me on this one point:

Pharmacom has THOUSANDS of customers each week and stand to make far more money consistently selling one of the best products than trying to rip off a couple guys.
Each batch has thousands of vials -- vials are filled on an automated assembly line NOT one at a time by hand like some small garage UGLs.
I, like many of us, are present on multiple boards (I am on at least 8 English speaking boards).
If a batch was this severely under-dosed we would all see an outbreak of complaints from hundreds of customers that received that batch.
I see nothing in terms of multiple complaints.

I have not seen anything out of the ordinary in terms of complaints -- one guy on here today or yesterday claimed the tren-e is not working for him (ONE guy among thousands).
But I have seen many positive reviews, anonymous testing results, and good blood results posted.
More importantly, the real data, SIMEC results from AnabolicLab and from anonymous individual private HPLC testing have consistently proven Pharmacom is of the highest quality.

It is extremely unlikely your vial is underdosed.
I am a customer for a long time -- I lift -- I try to stay young (I am middle aged) -- I know it is important to have good gear -- I am your peer and I am genuine in saying that I am sorry you are not happy with the results.

I do not know what other factors could have lead to a poor result.
Personally, I have had the blood lab make a mistake in the past and it was difficult to sort out but I made calls and got to the bottom of it and the lab gave me a new test (I only caught the mistake because I get tested every 2 to 3 months for many years and knew there was no way my blood glucose level would have changed as drastically as the results shown, as if I suddenly became diabetic).

Could the vial have been exposed to any extreme condition that may have degraded the compound? Extreme heat? intense sunlight? Left ion teh car during a HOT summer day?
Hide your stash in the basement at chernobyl? lol

I do not know man, your guess is as good as mine but something is up and I logically know it is not Pharmacom making a handful of special vials just for one or two guys while everyone else gets the thousand good vials from automated production line.

Please take the fact that I just spent a long time writing this huge post as a sign that I respect your concern and that I care brother.
Click to expand...
There is no way it could be underdosed ... that’s bullshit there are a ugl just like the rest of them ... they are no better then the dude that brews at home ... and why defend a lab over members ?
Idk why you wasted 20 mins of ur life typing a essay on it ... not trying to talk shit just trying to understand why anyone would go out of there way for a lab ... iv ran there shit it was ok no different then any other ugl Iv ran ...
 
wedorecover said:
There is no way it could be underdosed ... that’s bullshit there are a ugl just like the rest of them ... they are no better then the dude that brews at home ... and why defend a lab over members ?
Idk why you wasted 20 mins of ur life typing a essay on it
Click to expand...
If you check out the pharmacom thread, the member thinks he mixed up test p with test e because of the stealth shipping
 
Cityofgrit said:
And I find it strange your first fucking post is attacking Anaboliclabs credibility
Click to expand...
I have never had the need to post anything, if I have had any doubt about something I have sent a private message to the user in question. I read in other forums gebte that questions or praises the work of anaboliclab and as the user alluded to it, I wanted to ask him if he had any information. I have not accused you of whether you are in favor of the brand you are x or if you are against it is you x. The next time I'm going to post something I'll ask you first so that afterwards I will not be accused of anything.....
 
eversmann said:
I have never had the need to post anything, if I have had any doubt about something I have sent a private message to the user in question. I read in other forums gebte that questions or praises the work of anaboliclab and as the user alluded to it, I wanted to ask him if he had any information. I have not accused you of whether you are in favor of the brand you are x or if you are against it is you x. The next time I'm going to post something I'll ask you first so that afterwards I will not be accused of anything.....
Click to expand...
I'm not trying to be a jerk.. try going to AnabolicLabs website and read what it's all about and how they get their funding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Masteron for gyno
Replies
9
Views
276
Foxman101
F
Jeffholio5
Newest lab values
Replies
5
Views
71
DECLAN
D
F
There is something strange about Pharmacom Labs Test-E
Replies
2
Views
470
Enjoythements
Enjoythements
T
Bulk cycle
Replies
12
Views
273
oldgrey
O
S
Is generic HGH a scam?
2 3
Replies
50
Views
3K
Sampei
Sampei

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top