The fact you got so hostile over your own mistake also indicates that I or my friends or everyone else that has common sense won't order your products until you improve quality and assure us we are buying what is labeled.
I think the business will be just fine without your purchases or your friends -- no need to worry about the source's income, but I appreciate your concern.
Hostile and upset?
To be clear, no one here got upset or hostile at all, but maybe you.
Nor have I made any mistake producing anything-- I do not produce anything (I am a customer just like you or anyone else, working as a consultant because of my experience and educational background and to help facilitate communication with the English speaking market because English is not the primary/first language).
Look back, I thanked you for posting and said I support your freedom to express your opinions.
I am not sure why you do not respect the fact I value the Constitution and as such I am supportive of your freedoms; it is odd that you take respect and support of freedom as hotility.
Without bashers, trolls, and shills, like you, I am not as needed or have the opportunity to reply -- so not only do you help keep the source's thread bumped, but you almost justify some of my income
thank you for that as well.
Therefore,I am not at all upset with you (quite the opposite, I appreciate you).
Regardless, my mood does not have any relevance to the topic.
Jc420 you should start lab and it may be the most successful source ever if you can achieve a quality than even Big-Pharma companies or industry-grade production (as mentioned in my previous post).
I know I would buy from you if you can achieve infallible perfection (something not even the largest publicly traded corporations have ever achieved).
Well until then, regardless of this topic or the outcome of this old batch (which was produced years ago and is no longer for sale) Pharmacom will still be in business, keep getting more customers (his bumping of the thread actually and the resulting attention actually helps that cause), and continue to be one of the most popular labs in the world.
As I already stated, but I am happy to repeat for you, I feel like your question may not be legitimate nor logical -- it is a logical fallacy called "begging the question."*
If you had any stronger evidence or additional proof at this time in support of your concerns, I suspect you would have presented it;
independent of any future findings regarding the batch in question (it actually being adex or if it is determined to be letro in the follow-up testings) does not change the logic, or should I say lack thereof, of your manipulative wording -- you have not current presented any additional data or support of your claims nor added any additional information to this topic.
IF you have some new important evidence or data please share it with all of here now; if not, you have not offered anything new of value to consider.
You assume something but have not proven your assumption.
The assumption you put forth (and entire basis for your "question") is debated, being questioned, further testing needed, and you have NOT proven it to be without room to doubt (see post linked below):
PHARMA MIX 3. Each milliliter contains: - Testosterone Enanthate 200 mg / ml. - Nandrolone Decanoate 200 mg / ml. - Trenbolone Enanthate 100 mg / ml. PHARMA MIX 3 is a unique combination of drugs designed specifically for extreme muscle growth and strength. Because of its features and high...
thinksteroids.com
"The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle."
*--REFERENCE linked below (I urge people to please learn this and other manipulations so we may each identify if/when they occur in all aspects of life -- especially with the media and politicians):
Now for someone who claims to be a long-time member and so interested in this topic, I am surprised you are not up-to-date with things and/or able to find/search for recent posts yourself.
Do you truly need to be spoon-fed the info? or are you just trolling?
Regardless, here you go (search results summarizing the topic in the post linked below):
PHARMA MIX 3. Each milliliter contains: - Testosterone Enanthate 200 mg / ml. - Nandrolone Decanoate 200 mg / ml. - Trenbolone Enanthate 100 mg / ml. PHARMA MIX 3 is a unique combination of drugs designed specifically for extreme muscle growth and strength. Because of its features and high...
thinksteroids.com
Here is what we know so far:
•SIMEC testing showed the batch was made from raws that are adex.
•Nonetheless, as Frank stated, he "asked Janoshik to do an extra test and paid for it. It confirmed the first result. It showed letrozol. It is hard to deny chromotography reports, so there is no way I deny Janoshik`s reports."
•Clearly the source is not trying to scam anyone because it would not make any sense to provide an expensive compound at such a precise measured amount (it was nearly perfectly 1mg testing at 0.97mg) -- this rules out any profit incentive or skipping measuring etc.
•Regardless of your individual situation or interest, at this point even the source wants to know more and, according to Frank, "obviously further analysis of this batch from a third-side lab is needed."
•INTL Warehouses do not have any of this batch left in stock; the source has removed this batch from their shelves at US domestic warehouse.
If you are already in direct communications with Frank from Basicstero, then he will handle it from here.
But if you are not, let me know (here or PM) and I will try to help. I do not have any special access to accounts, orders, or any authority to send out products etc. but I can at least help facilitate communication and/or help reach a resolution.
For anyone that reads my reply here and does not understand the context and/or needs some background about what we are talking about here, my recent post below is a summary from Frank of what we know so far:
Here is the analytic result from SIMEC for that batch (according to Frank from Pharmacom Labs):
Please see the very recent post quoted below that answers your question and concerns:
I look forward to figuring out this situation and hopefully it leads to positive outcomes and improvement for everyone.
Investigating this result holds the source, the raws supplier, and even testing services to higher standards and all that leads to is even better higher quality products and services for all of us.
For these reasons, instead of stress and negativity, I view this situation as a positive opportunity for continuous improvement in these important areas of interest to all of us here.
Also, understand no one here is against one another -- we all want the same things with good testing, high quality products, and most of all the freedom to make the choices we choose to make in our lives, our interests, our health, and our goals, without government overreach.
