I respect you RT but you know that excuse is just a pile of bullshit.No demand for Primo200?Everytime a new batch was available at the store it was sold out in a couple weeks.The only accurately dosed Primo200 besides yours was from dragon pharma back when they were good.But they turned into shit and started scamming customers which means you had the monopoly on the Primo200 market.Lets be honest the reason why Primo200 has been cancelled is because the source is afraid to lose money due to their shitty leaking stoppers.Think about it each vial costs 125 dollars ,that alot of money per batch.The question now is,why do we as the customers get punished for the sources incompetence and greed? How much money are you saving per batch by using low quality stoppers?I dont understand this at all,you guys are just shooting yourselves in the foot with bullshit like that.This isnt adressed at you brother i know you have no direct impact on decisions like that but hopefully basicstero management reverts some horrible decisions made in the past.
all I can do is report what I have read or was told -- I am a customer in the USA and have no way to physically investigate the production facility or management offices on the other side of the world.
Primo-200 at 10 ml x 200 mg/ml is 2000 mg a vial of primobolan for $140 which equals $0.070 of gross revenue per mg of primobolan.
Primo-100 at 10 ml x 100 mg/ml is 1000 mg a vial of primobolan for $95 which equals $0.095 of gross revenue per mg of primobolan.
$0.095 / $0.070 = 1.357
Or, in other words, the Primo-100 generates 35.7% more gross revenue per mg of primo than the Primo-200 product.
We all know this as consumers, that the higher concentration product costs us less per mg -- how much less? 35.7% less.
Therefore the source can generate 35.7% greater gross revenue per mg of Primo raws by selling the Primo-100 instead of Primo-200.
That's a BIG percentage difference return-on-investment -- the purpose of a business is to generate return-on-investment and make a profit.
So, unless there is/was enough demand for the Primo-200 that volume of sales would generate a greater profit than what is lost by producing the less-favorable return-on-investment, it is a simple and obvious business decision.
By this I mean, if you had a 100 Kg barrel of Primo raws that cost you a large sum of moment -- and, keep in mind, you made the investment for the purpose of generating income -- you can generate 37.5% greater gross revenue by producing the greater price-per-mg finished product.
The only way you would complete with yourself is if some of your 100 Kg raws will not sell as a Primo-100 product; if that were the case, you could try to make other products, such as Primo-200 or mixes etc., to utilize all of the resources for revenue generation.
However, if you are limited by raws, not by demand -- all can be used and sold just making Primo-100 -- then, the more profitable choice is to produce the product which yields the greatest return-on-investment.
Don't get me wrong or misunderstand, just because I see the logic and business decision, it does not mean I like the result -- I wish we still had access the Pharmacom's excellent Primo-200 product.
The Primo-200 is my absolute favorite product and I have used it with Test in my mixed HRT, exclusively for about 3 years now.
I was perfect for my needs and I depend on it.
I had a lot stashed, but getting down to my last few vials here soon.
I really hope, and need, it comes back.
Pinning the 100 will stuck because I liked a smaller volume which allows for so many different pin sites and less carrier oil (while it may be a relatively minor detail, a lifetime of the compounds in carrier oils may not be optimal for health) for my life-long HRT.
It is all beyond my control or influence though -- what can I do?