@Steve84
@RThoads
@Lean_N_Mean
Excellent right ups from all 3 of you. All three who I've seen in other threads and regardless of the positive posting rewards I didn't think you guys were lying about your experience.
Steve84, you admitted they rewarded and you cashed in and that was humble on your part. I appreciate that cause I didn't know that.
I've almost stayed away from this thread completely since they've gotten here based on the fact that before they were here and I was here, I was ripped off $1800 worth of gear from them. Bought Test, Deca and Tren and after 6 weeks of feeling nothing I started running 1000mg of each compound in desperation hoping it was just really underdosed and ended up getting nothing.
At that time I didn't have a lot of money and maybe I shouldn't have spent all that money on it but I did. Ever since then this place has put a bad tast in my mouth in regards to how they do business. So I see members specially new members speak up saying their shit was bunk and it pisses me off.
Oh and they also have failed testing. Someone posted a list on another thread.
Fuck sorry for your loss man....
And when I defend it usually comes to that extent where I just want proof of others bunk claims.
Run bloods, send for testing, etc etc
I honestly felt the same way on a run of test. Was putting in 500mg/week of PCOM T500. Thought something was off...
But then I sent the open vial to Analyzer for testing, came back on the dot. Turns out it was something I was doing wrong. Not saying that was your case, but that was mine.
And oh ya! If the source offers a credit for testing/bloodwork or a log, i'll take them up on that. No shame. Doesn't always mean it's going to be favorable but i'm also not afraid to walk away from a source. I've gotten burnt as well.
But I do think that review/credit they offer does do good and bad things. For newer members they want that money. And people who maybe were like us starting outand didn't have that money necessarily. I just have trouble because many of those members that are new saying it was bunk...don't have any bloods or anything to prove their statement. Some even want replacements after it's gone, which if it's bunk why?
I think it goes equally to those who defend the source to prove some claims as much as those who bash it to prove their claims. Now bashing can be easier. I simply don't run things right, claim my bloods are bunk and the shit is bunk and that's proven.
It's the successful claims that are harder. I can't have skyrocketed E2 and bunk Tren (Can't get sensitive test). Or I can't run Deca and not blow up my Test reading. Or I can't run Test and not show an elevated test level.
And I mean we don't always have to agree/disagree in threads. Likewise I see you in other threads. No beef.
I think to each of our own ways/experience we are trying to look out for others.
To me, i'll defend PCOM as my experience. And to those who bash it, i'll try to hold them accountable with proof. Not for the source. But for myself. Everytime I see something shady I question if that will happen to me. I will always try to help someone that seems legitimate and comes to the table with some evidence. Because that's what i'm looking for. Reasonable doubt with my source.