GMC
Member
2013….long enough?You said a "long history" of scamming. Besides that one incident that no one is denying, do you have any other proof to back up your claim of a "long history" of scamming?
There are loads more of these sort of comments dotted about the forum.Dude I've already used their bunk gear back in 2013 when they sent me bullshit. wasted a lot of money and time. I'm just here to help those not make that same mistake I did. PSL is a scammer. You are a shill. Basic as that.
As we are in the underground section of a steroid forum that is here specifically for source reviews and complaints (amongst other things), and not in a court of law - the burden of proof (that you keep banging on about) doesn’t really stand.
However, evaluating the reputation of a source, reviews/complaints & testimonies of previous customers are valuable evidence and carry significant weight with potential buyers.
These testimonies provide a compelling basis for forming an opinion about the sources trustworthiness, and the quality of his service.
By considering a variety of member’s comments regarding their experience, it’s easy to identify common patterns or recurring issues that might indicate problematic business practices - of which, in this case there are many!!
If multiple independent members share similar negative experiences or complaints about a source - it clearly suggests a patterns in the vendors behaviour and ways of business.
These patterns are indicative of underlying issues that are likely to affect many other customers...especially the new, and inexperienced.
While individual review/complaints can be seen as subjective, when multiple accounts align in terms of the problems faced, it adds much weight to the credibility of those claims!!
Also, why would previous customers post bad reviews unless they have genuinely had a negative experience? Members who voluntarily share their experiences often do so to warn others or express their dissatisfaction… making their testimonies more reliable in assessing a retailer's reputation, opposed to yours (and all the other shills) that have a vested interest in defending PSL.
So, such information - albeit not the ‘proof’ you so adamantly demand, it is valuable to the community when making an informed decision about whether to engage (or not) with a particular source - it's essential people exercise some critical thinking and consider multiple factors such as the credibility of the source, and the specific nature of the complaints…especially when you are putting these products inside your body!!!
It’s just basic harm-reduction.