PurplePandaLabs Raw source

By injecting, you only avoid liver damage for the first hour or so
then it passes trough the liver harming it, even if the steroid doesn't get excreted from the body yet.

I understand it goes through the liver BUT would half as much injected be easier on the liver than twice the amount oral?
 
What monetary amount would you say makes you a big buyer?
Something well beyond personal use. A reseller.
Really, to get a search warrant then conduct a search cost money and resources. They aren't going to bother with an average Joe. Look how much stuff is seized by customs. They aren't raiding everyone who has a few hundred grams of raws seized. They want the big fish.
 
Something well beyond personal use. A reseller.
Really, to get a search warrant then conduct a search cost money and resources. They aren't going to bother with an average Joe. Look how much stuff is seized by customs. They aren't raiding everyone who has a few hundred grams of raws seized. They want the big fish.

Simply not true.

It costs very little to get a search warrant especially when customs already has documented the evidence. And to Have one officer give you a package costs nothing more than a cop on duty already.

Little fish are busted all day everyday. To think otherwise is just convincing yourself to not be so paranoid.

In the eyes of the laws, raws is not for personal use when you have all the equipment to manufacture and distribute.
Not to mention since it went across state lines you also get a nice charge of trafficking.
 
Simply not true.

It costs very little to get a search warrant especially when customs already has documented the evidence. And to Have one officer give you a package costs nothing more than a cop on duty already.

Little fish are busted all day everyday. To think otherwise is just convincing yourself to not be so paranoid.

In the eyes of the laws, raws is not for personal use when you have all the equipment to manufacture and distribute.
Not to mention since it went across state lines you also get a nice charge of trafficking.
True but you're talking controlled delivery I was talking obtaining a search warrant
 
So you have to pay for a search warrant?
No, but there is a chain of events that need to happen. Again resources. Unfortunately, I've had some experience with the whole thing in the distant past. Nothing to do with AAS

And RR is 100% correct, manufacturing is a juicy charge, so is possession of chemicals and equipment.
 
No, but there is a chain of events that need to happen. Again resources. Unfortunately, I've had some experience with the whole thing in the distant past. Nothing to do with AAS

And RR is 100% correct, manufacturing is a juicy charge, so is possession of chemicals and equipment.
Yea, you need probable cause to believe crime is being committed. You apply for a search warrant with a judge. He approves it or doesnt.

We have the constitution and the bill of rights, the 4th amendment protects us from illegal searches and seizures. So that warrant will be very specific as to what they're looking for and where they can look for.

It's not a simple process. And law enforcement donthave unlimited resources. Or free reign to do whatever they want.

(Not arguing with you, just making conversation)

For e.g. just recently I seen a cop pull someone over for a broken taillight. They pull him over, they find out hes drunk. He fails sobriety test yadayadayada...

He gets arrested.

The defense asks why did you pull my client over? The cop says broken taillight.

Defense shows him a picture of the tail light, and says it wasnt broken. Cop is a stand up guy, says yes I noticed upon further inspection that the taillight wasnt actually broken.

The guy gets off. That's the protection you get from the bill of rights. The guy was illegally "searched and seized" so anything found from that illegal search and seizure, cant be used in court. So the fact he was drunk couldn't be used.

I'm just using that as an example, and I too have a different perspective on these situations compared to typical forum members.
 
I say this all with a caveat, that yes obviously you can be arrested for anything. But being convicted is a whole other ball game.

But cops, generally speaking, know what they can or cant do, and what they can get away with and what not...
 
True but you're talking controlled delivery I was talking obtaining a search warrant

Literally just a document signed by a judge. Le routinely get search warrants for small fish all the time, and there seems to be no fish small enough for swat teams to be involved. It’s kinda crazy how often they involve swat for people known to possess minuscule amounts of drugs.
 
Getting a warrant isn't exactly an easy thing. You have to have cause and have a chain of people to sign off on it which can take time and money.
Our government is too busy raping young children in cages for marching through the boarder to be worried about a meat head with 100g of var.
 
Literally just a document signed by a judge. Le routinely get search warrants for small fish all the time, and there seems to be no fish small enough for swat teams to be involved. It’s kinda crazy how often they involve swat for people known to possess minuscule amounts of drugs.

They need training, also depends on jurisdiction. Some departments really don't have the time or manpower to chase down a drug user when they have accidents all day and stacks of murders and robberys to solve.
 
Yea, you need probable cause to believe crime is being committed. You apply for a search warrant with a judge. He approves it or doesnt.

We have the constitution and the bill of rights, the 4th amendment protects us from illegal searches and seizures. So that warrant will be very specific as to what they're looking for and where they can look for.

It's not a simple process. And law enforcement donthave unlimited resources. Or free reign to do whatever they want.

(Not arguing with you, just making conversation)

For e.g. just recently I seen a cop pull someone over for a broken taillight. They pull him over, they find out hes drunk. He fails sobriety test yadayadayada...

He gets arrested.

The defense asks why did you pull my client over? The cop says broken taillight.

Defense shows him a picture of the tail light, and says it wasnt broken. Cop is a stand up guy, says yes I noticed upon further inspection that the taillight wasnt actually broken.

The guy gets off. That's the protection you get from the bill of rights. The guy was illegally "searched and seized" so anything found from that illegal search and seizure, cant be used in court. So the fact he was drunk couldn't be used.

I'm just using that as an example, and I too have a different perspective on these situations compared to typical forum members.

Eh a reasonable suspicion that a reasonable person would believe could likely be enough probable cause to get a warrant signed. Le isn’t required to show proof beyond a reasonable doubt to get a warrant.

And yes I’ve heard of cases being dismissed because le only observed the car go onto the lane divider once and get dismissed even tho the driver was drunk.
 
Literally just a document signed by a judge. Le routinely get search warrants for small fish all the time, and there seems to be no fish small enough for swat teams to be involved. It’s kinda crazy how often they involve swat for people known to possess minuscule amounts of drugs.
We lived in a very upside down society bro.

So many actual problems in the world that get over looked and yet they spend their time on some petty raws that enhance muscles?

We have sex trafficking in the suburbs , we have deaths every minute due to drunk driving and yet how many liquor stores are being closed ? Hmmm I can go on for weeks how fucked out government is and how it pays attention to shit that doesn't effect your average person
 
Yea, you need probable cause to believe crime is being committed. You apply for a search warrant with a judge. He approves it or doesnt.

We have the constitution and the bill of rights, the 4th amendment protects us from illegal searches and seizures. So that warrant will be very specific as to what they're looking for and where they can look for.

It's not a simple process. And law enforcement donthave unlimited resources. Or free reign to do whatever they want.

(Not arguing with you, just making conversation)

For e.g. just recently I seen a cop pull someone over for a broken taillight. They pull him over, they find out hes drunk. He fails sobriety test yadayadayada...

He gets arrested.

The defense asks why did you pull my client over? The cop says broken taillight.

Defense shows him a picture of the tail light, and says it wasnt broken. Cop is a stand up guy, says yes I noticed upon further inspection that the taillight wasnt actually broken.

The guy gets off. That's the protection you get from the bill of rights. The guy was illegally "searched and seized" so anything found from that illegal search and seizure, cant be used in court. So the fact he was drunk couldn't be used.

I'm just using that as an example, and I too have a different perspective on these situations compared to typical forum members.
I’m not trying to be confrontational with you at all but the Constitution has been torn up and thrown away for quite some time. You cannot just simply say but the Constitution protects this or that from happening. There isn’t a judge, lawyer or cop that hasn’t wiped their ass with the Constitution. It’s merely a burden to them. Only valid when someone’s looking.
I happen to be one of “those” guys that think the Constitution is the single greatest document written by man. If only the people that it’s meant to protect would protect it.
 
Eh a reasonable suspicion that a reasonable person would believe could likely be enough probable cause to get a warrant signed. Le isn’t required to show proof beyond a reasonable doubt to get a warrant.
But what warrants "beyond reasonable doubt" ?
How many blacks are shoot because the cops feel they have probable cause ?

It's all bullshit.


Are they going to stop everyone based off a stero type ?

Everytime they see a jacked mother fucker , are they going to follow him home and break down the down searching for gear ?

It has to be more than just ...

Unfortunately this shit happens . Is it right ? No
 
Getting a warrant isn't exactly an easy thing. You have to have cause and have a chain of people to sign off on it which can take time and money.
Our government is too busy raping young children in cages for marching through the boarder to be worried about a meat head with 100g of var.

Right now if le has probable cause they can fax an oncall judge and have them sign it, or not. I think you’re thinking of evidence.

They need training, also depends on jurisdiction. Some departments really don't have the time or manpower to chase down a drug user when they have accidents all day and stacks of murders and robberys to solve.

Drugs take precedents over murders and robberies, look at how many drug offenders are getting longer sentences than murders. Most le have dedicated narcotics team.
 
Wtf makes you think that's me???? Dude I'm not any kind of scammer. I'm currently on trial and yes your fucking lab was mentioned. I've been apart of this roid scene for barely a year and no I've never extorted anyone. You're a worthless piece of shit for trying to twist and turn this shit around to take the focus off the fact that I got busted for drugs.

Oh yeah And I don't know who tf elite is outside of the ammount of times he's been mentioned in this thread, but if he's in any relation to Kyle and Erica Roop he's still handling PPL's shit and I have it on good Authority trust me.

Funny how when you were asked why you didn't come up with your explanation for firing elite you danced around the question DID NOT ANSWER and somehow a picture of Vicky just magically and conviently loaded and the person who asked the question got distracted and did not press the issue.

Trust me I don't want money, all I want is to make sure no one else false victim to you. Enjoy freedom in China you worthless scum bag.
What make me think that’s you... hmmm, maybe the fact you told me you were going to do this exact thing if I didn’t pay you. So let me point out a couple things that makes me know your claims are BS. If my lab was mentioned in any of your court proceedings it would mean it was a federal case. So let’s continue, the federal government has a 95% conviction rate for cases taken to trial.

99% of people know they are not going to beat the Feds in trail, so they take a plea agreement, in exchange the federal government drops some of the BS charges they tack onto you when they arrest you. In that way you get a significantly less amount of time in prison then if you took it to trail and lost and were given the punishment for all the extra charges they like to tack on. If you take it to trial and lose, the prosecutor will also recommend to the judge that you receive the max sentence for all the charges. Whether the judge decides to do that is up to him. But regardless of what he chooses your penalty will still be more then double if you had agreed to their plea agreement.

And if you were big enough for the Feds to come and raid your whole operation they would have seized all your assets and left you with nothing. Taking the Feds to court won’t cost you less then 100k for an attorney who’s worth a shit. How do I know all this??? Because I’ve been through the federal system and did multiple years in federal prison before I was even in my mid twenties.

Just face it, you’re the same POS who has been emailing me trying to extort me for money. And don’t even try and say that a state case mentions an international raws seller. Because, even if it was state police who did a controlled delivery how would they have known the raws came from me? They take your computers and go through your records? Well then it doesn’t sound like you have much of a leg to stand on in court if you’re going to trial. You’re full of shit.

And I’m far from a scumbag. I offer products for sale. People receive goods and I receive a profit for the work of providing those goods. Nothing any different then going to Walmart or homedepot. Does the fact I sell products that are deemed illegal in many countries but not the one I live in make me a scumbag? No, no it doesn’t. I provide the best stealth I can when I ship products to people I know are in countries that deem those products illegal. I’m not holding a gun to anyone’s head and saying you have to buy from me. If you live in a country that these products are illegal then there is going to inherently be a risk to buying them. No source has a perfect track record on seizures. None.

But to act like I don’t care about people’s safety is asinine. If I didn’t care about customers safety I wouldn’t use stealth, I wouldn’t have a website that stores information off site, I wouldn’t use encrypted email. I have personally been through the US federal prison system and would never wish that on another human being. I do the best I can for my customers that I possibly can in terms of safety. But again, no stealth is full proof.

And I’m going to admit something I don’t think I have before. Testosterone and other steroids are legal in China. But manufacturing finished products is very much so illegal here. If I got caught making finished products here there’s a mandatory 10 year prison sentence for manufacturing pharmaceutical products without a license here. And also, selling raws without a pharmaceutical exportation license is also illegal. And I can tell you that none of the raws sellers like landmark or any of the other resellers have that license. I do still take a risk here doing what I do. I’m not sitting in China with impunity
 
Last edited:
Back
Top