CFH016
Member
Damn that's a rough one. I respect the fact you're reaching out and asking for advice though. There's some good, although varied, advice being given here and hopefully it limits the fallout from this.I don't know how to deal with it to be honest..
I like this idea. Real data is what is important and the parameters can be announced in the following group buys. The purity guarantee would have to be lowered as a result but it would show people that it doesn't necessarily have to do with manufacturing problems.@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals i think you should lower the guarantee. But how much lower is something that should be based on more data. Not random numbers. Test a vial of product for one month or two under harsh conditions to assess how much degradation will take place and base the guarantee on that. This way you are relying on some actual data.
I hope rather than just re shipping to everyone Q is just saying to reach out for a re ship. Maybe the majority of people are reasonable and won't ask for one and this won't be too costly of a mishap.
