LeoTC
Member
As I said when you offered, there is no reason for you to run it by me first. Transparency is the best approach given all the behind-the-scenes gossip by members recently.
Suggesting that you could be banned for it? Isn't that a little much?
The most offensive item about me is essentially this:
I didn't ban @biggerben69, so I must be a crack dealer. Obviously. Because whatever other possible conclusion could there be, right?
Your summary attempts to explain why people could be susceptible to believing these rumors. You may be right. This is why some people gave them credence. And I thank you for taking the time to compile this.
But the specious reasoning is based on one assumption after another. I'm surprised that anyone would take it seriously.
Furthermore, I am surprised that the people who feel unfairly accused of being part of some grand conspiracy are not the first the reject this type of bullshit.
I hope you consider sharing the unedited summary publicly. If you have reasons to avoid this, I respect them. But I won't stop you.
I honestly don't think anyone believes you're involved in a clandestine drug ring, nor Stanny.
I think it was a greater collective of members trying to figure out where the bullshit originated.
We've all seen the convos in question and there's...nothing there.