[Source] Sasquatch Labs - Intro/Sale (US Domestic)

The testosterone is accurately dosed to the best of our abilities. 7-8x bloodwork results are exactly what we would expect. We offered a large credit because we stand by our products and knew we would get positive reviews back.

Jay
Theyd be dosed dead on if you used Analyzer to test your raws.
Testing the Raws as POG used to do would be great to know the exact % purity and then brew it accordingly to bring it to desired concentration. Also, it will help you know how good your raw source if treating you. I think this is what really sets the best brands apart from the majority -- they spend the little extra to get Mass Spec on raws to know exactly what they have and get HPLC on finished products to prove they accomplished exactly what they set out to produce.

IF you are able to get small samples of your raws tested you wil be good.
  1. it will protect you by making sure you aregetting what you pay for from your raw source.
  2. it will protect your name because if you raws are wrong it is NOT your fault but people will blame you if var is winny etc... this way your name will be like gold because you know 100% you have what you wanted.
  3. you can brew to perfectly hit exact label goals by adjusting for slight impurity. For example, if a raw is 98% pure then you can account for this. IF you recipe calls for 20g then you can make the adjustment using the ratio 100/98 and wight out 20.41g to give exactly 20.0g of active ingredient for the brew (20.42g*0.098=20.0g); that is just an arbitrary example but we can do the math for any recipe you have once you know the exact purity of the raws via MassSpec.
  4. You will be in an exclusive class of sources -- elite -- and very appreciated all at a very small additional cost to you (you can easily charge a little more to make up for the cost because you will have the BEST product possible as long as your raws were pure). weneed to make sure the tester(s) will allow "unkown" samples; by this I mean, we don't tell them what the raw is supposed to be (this way it keeps the tester honest too). I always worried that when I told SIMEC "here is a vial of primobolan please determine the presence of primo and the amount per mL" that they could just tell me anything and how would I know?

    So youll keep your raw sources honest by getting analysis on their raws. Youll keep testers honest by having them use mass spec to tell us what the powder is without telling them what it should be (just label each small sample witha a number that only you know what number go with what raw -- such as sample #1001, #1002, #1003 etc...)

    Test a couple finished products to promote yourself (and to confirm your process and recipe was correct) and if/when some reverse scammer bashes, you will know with confidence that there is ZERO chance your gear was wrong -- you can call them out and invite them to send in an unopened vial for their own testing. You can be confident if one day anaboliclab.com anonymously tests your brand that you will put up awesome results and it will further promote your brand instead of expose an issue.

    All that is left on your end to be the best is making sure you filter twice and at least the last filtration is through a 0.20 micron sterile filter so there is never a sterility issue.
    pure, accurate, and clean --and proven -- that will sell itself, you won't be able to keep up and will be able to be selective with your clients because more people will want the product than you will be able to put out.
 
Of course man. He made a batch, how long do we think it would take someone to post bloods for 400$ store credit? I mean right when he posted this, people were jumping on board to try to hurry and get bloods in.

It is cheap, but how many times you see a lab come in, overdose gear, give a huge store credit to get bloods coming in... bloods come back crazy high.. people get hyped and start buying up. It's a classic move seen 100x over again.


JUST IN TIME FOR TAX SEASON
 
Ahh got you. Just make sure when you send to analyzer you don't have what lab it came from or anything.

I wouldn't expect analyzer to pull any shady things, but wouldn't be the first to do.

No doubt. Have a few oils from PPL that I'll be sending in along with it so just going to label them like A1, A2, etc or something similar.
 
Theyd be dosed dead on if you used Analyzer to test your raws.
Testing the Raws as POG used to do would be great to know the exact % purity and then brew it accordingly to bring it to desired concentration. Also, it will help you know how good your raw source if treating you. I think this is what really sets the best brands apart from the majority -- they spend the little extra to get Mass Spec on raws to know exactly what they have and get HPLC on finished products to prove they accomplished exactly what they set out to produce.

IF you are able to get small samples of your raws tested you wil be good.
  1. it will protect you by making sure you aregetting what you pay for from your raw source.
  2. it will protect your name because if you raws are wrong it is NOT your fault but people will blame you if var is winny etc... this way your name will be like gold because you know 100% you have what you wanted.
  3. you can brew to perfectly hit exact label goals by adjusting for slight impurity. For example, if a raw is 98% pure then you can account for this. IF you recipe calls for 20g then you can make the adjustment using the ratio 100/98 and wight out 20.41g to give exactly 20.0g of active ingredient for the brew (20.42g*0.098=20.0g); that is just an arbitrary example but we can do the math for any recipe you have once you know the exact purity of the raws via MassSpec.
  4. You will be in an exclusive class of sources -- elite -- and very appreciated all at a very small additional cost to you (you can easily charge a little more to make up for the cost because you will have the BEST product possible as long as your raws were pure). weneed to make sure the tester(s) will allow "unkown" samples; by this I mean, we don't tell them what the raw is supposed to be (this way it keeps the tester honest too). I always worried that when I told SIMEC "here is a vial of primobolan please determine the presence of primo and the amount per mL" that they could just tell me anything and how would I know?

    So youll keep your raw sources honest by getting analysis on their raws. Youll keep testers honest by having them use mass spec to tell us what the powder is without telling them what it should be (just label each small sample witha a number that only you know what number go with what raw -- such as sample #1001, #1002, #1003 etc...)

    Test a couple finished products to promote yourself (and to confirm your process and recipe was correct) and if/when some reverse scammer bashes, you will know with confidence that there is ZERO chance your gear was wrong -- you can call them out and invite them to send in an unopened vial for their own testing. You can be confident if one day anaboliclab.com anonymously tests your brand that you will put up awesome results and it will further promote your brand instead of expose an issue.

    All that is left on your end to be the best is making sure you filter twice and at least the last filtration is through a 0.20 micron sterile filter so there is never a sterility issue.
    pure, accurate, and clean --and proven -- that will sell itself, you won't be able to keep up and will be able to be selective with your clients because more people will want the product than you will be able to put out.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@Sasquatch Labs after all that info i jus posted you have nothing to say about it? Did you even acknowledged it or did ya jus skim on past it without looking twice?
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@Sasquatch Labs after all that info i jus posted you have nothing to say about it? Did you even acknowledged it or did ya jus skim on past it without looking twice?

We read your post. Thanks for the input. We agree with everything you said. We're testing our raws and now have incentive for you guys to perform 3rd party testing.

Jay
 
We read your post. Thanks for the input. We agree with everything you said. We're testing our raws and now have incentive for you guys to perform 3rd party testing.

Jay
Will you be providing the results for us all to see before brewing? Are you going through analyzer? Do you k ow how to do the math once you have the potency of the raws in order to hit exact lable claims with each an every brew you pull off of said tested batch?
 
I made a comment here thinking I was on the brew kit thread, no insults intended here.

Now I know how test flunkies feels
Lmfao you could never feel the way TestBunky feels. Youd have to have a black heart with no brians....which you are far from my man lol.
 
Lmfao you could never feel the way TestBunky feels. Youd have to have a black heart with no brians....which you are far from my man lol.
Lmfao you could never feel the way TestBunky feels. Youd have to have a black heart with no brians....which you are far from my man lol.
Thank you but I still have time for a head trauma or some really bad drugs.

Lol
 
Will you be providing the results for us all to see before brewing? Are you going through analyzer? Do you k ow how to do the math once you have the potency of the raws in order to hit exact lable claims with each an every brew you pull off of said tested batch?

We will provide the results. We have someone other than analyzer but will look into using him. And yes, we can compensate for < 100% raw purity. Thanks for looking out for the board.

Jay
 
Back
Top