origamiwizard8
Member
You’d be surprised, I had 0 sex drive for months. I know people that have run sarms and their test levels were in the toilet after.There's no way you shut down your natural test production from sarms
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’d be surprised, I had 0 sex drive for months. I know people that have run sarms and their test levels were in the toilet after.There's no way you shut down your natural test production from sarms
You’d be surprised, I had 0 sex drive for months. I know people that have run sarms and their test levels were in the toilet after.
Dude was trying to tell me there’s “no way”. It happens to lots of people. I was listening to the wrong sources of information who said “you don’t need to pct off of this sarm” or “sarms won’t shut you down”. It’s all bullshit people use to sell sarms. Shit isn’t a joke.No, he wouldn't be surprised. Shutdown after sarms is a normal thing. That's why you need to pct.
Dude was trying to tell me there’s “no way”. It happens to lots of people. I was listening to the wrong sources of information who said “you don’t need to pct off of this sarm” or “sarms won’t shut you down”. It’s all bullshit people use to sell sarms. Shit isn’t a joke.
Im running ralox while on cycle and my nipples are smaller and the whole area shrank. I don't know if it will remain like this when im finished with the ralox but it's a big cosmetic improvement from previous puffy nipples.
Dude was trying to tell me there’s “no way”. It happens to lots of people. I was listening to the wrong sources of information who said “you don’t need to pct off of this sarm” or “sarms won’t shut you down”. It’s all bullshit people use to sell sarms. Shit isn’t a joke.
I meant there's no way you natty test didn't bounce back shortly after your sarms run!
Im running ralox while on cycle and my nipples are smaller and the whole area shrank. I don't know if it will remain like this when im finished with the ralox but it's a big cosmetic improvement from previous puffy nipples.
Ralox is the best serm for gyno and gyno prevention. Something like 30mg ed on cycle is a good idea if you are gyno prone.
How high are you running it?
I prefer Nolva for flare ups, then adding Ralox at 30mg to "Cruise"
Why do you start with nolva though? Ralox has a greater binding affinity for estrogen receptors in breast tissue and is more effective then nolva.
I had indian pharma and powder, i used pharma first at 60mg a day then powder at 100-140 a day to test "purity", both worked, no difference.Ralox is the best serm for gyno and gyno prevention. Something like 30mg ed on cycle is a good idea if you are gyno prone.
How high are you running it?
Its the same as shutting down your HPTA with exogenous testosterone...you roll the dice. Sarms should always be ran with a test base. This is why people who do sarm only cycles get roasted. They think its not as bad as i jecting testosterone. In reality youre doing more damage to your endocrine system with a sarms only cycleI meant there's no way you natty test didn't bounce back shortly after your sarms run!
Its the same as shutting down your HPTA with exogenous testosterone...you roll the dice. Sarms should always be ran with a test base. This is why people who do sarm only cycles get roasted. They think its not as bad as i jecting testosterone. In reality youre doing more damage to your endocrine system with a sarms only cycle
Its the same as shutting down your HPTA with exogenous testosterone...you roll the dice. Sarms should always be ran with a test base. This is why people who do sarm only cycles get roasted. They think its not as bad as i jecting testosterone. In reality youre doing more damage to your endocrine system with a sarms only cycle
It's not going to make it any cheaper most likely. The majority of the cost is just from the anesthesia and general procedure. Whether if you reduced your glands by 40%, 99% of docs will still quote you the same because they are still cutting you open and putting you under and a good doc should also be doing lipo to the area to sculpt the chest properly.I've been thinking about getting the surgery next year. But beforehand I wanted to try using raloxifene to decrease the size and possibly get a cheaper quote. I read that the oral bioavailability is pretty terrible (2% if I remember correctly). Would making a transdermal version be worth the work to get a better bioavailability and also a better localized dose? Maybe this is just bro science but figured I'd get your guy's opinion on if that would even work or if it's even possible creating a transdermal version.
You also have a picture of your chest from before and after?Surgery is the only option if the gland has grown as stated above by jetsfan. I had mine removed about 7 years ago. It was around 5k, but it was worth every cent. Spend the $ and you won't regret it. This is gland they pulled out of mine.
View attachment 145499
So since you got your glands removed 7 years ago has any gyno started to show again? I am going to get surgery but I may wait till it gets worse because last thing I want is surgery then 3 cycles later I have gyno starting to become noticeable. Also how many cycles have you done since surgery? And what compounds stacked? I run test with gh eq and a few weeks of anadrol with dianabol and later a few weeks of tren.Surgery is the only option if the gland has grown as stated above by jetsfan. I had mine removed about 7 years ago. It was around 5k, but it was worth every cent. Spend the $ and you won't regret it. This is gland they pulled out of mine.
View attachment 145499