War On Drugs



In 2001, nearly two decades into Pereira’s accidental specialisation in addiction, Portugal became the first country to decriminalise the possession and consumption of all illicit substances. Rather than being arrested, those caught with a personal supply might be given a warning, a small fine, or told to appear before a local commission – a doctor, a lawyer and a social worker – about treatment, harm reduction, and the support services that were available to them.

The opioid crisis soon stabilised, and the ensuing years saw dramatic drops in problematic drug use, HIV and hepatitis infection rates, overdose deaths, drug-related crime and incarceration rates. HIV infection plummeted from an all-time high in 2000 of 104.2 new cases per million to 4.2 cases per million in 2015. The data behind these changes has been studied and cited as evidence by harm-reduction movements around the globe. It’s misleading, however, to credit these positive results entirely to a change in law.

Portugal’s remarkable recovery, and the fact that it has held steady through several changes in government – including conservative leaders who would have preferred to return to the US-style war on drugs – could not have happened without an enormous cultural shift, and a change in how the country viewed drugs, addiction – and itself. In many ways, the law was merely a reflection of transformations that were already happening in clinics, in pharmacies and around kitchen tables across the country. The official policy of decriminalisation made it far easier for a broad range of services (health, psychiatry, employment, housing etc) that had been struggling to pool their resources and expertise, to work together more effectively to serve their communities.

The language began to shift, too. Those who had been referred to sneeringly as drogados (junkies) – became known more broadly, more sympathetically, and more accurately, as “people who use drugs” or “people with addiction disorders”. This, too, was crucial.
 


Norway is to become the first Scandinavian country to decriminalise drugs as it focuses on treatment rather than punishment.

The majority of the Norwegian parliament, the Storting, backed the historic shift which was supported by the Conservatives (Hoyre), Liberals (Venstre), the Labor Party (Ap) and the Socialist Left (SV).

They directed the national government to reform its policies on drugs.

Sveinung Stensland, deputy chairman of the Storting Health Committee, told Norwegian publication VG: “It is important to emphasise that we do not legalise cannabis and other drugs, but we decriminalise.
 
Fueled by drug crisis, U.S. life expectancy declines for a second straight year
Fueled by drug crisis, U.S. life expectancy declines for a second straight year

American life expectancy at birth declined for the second consecutive year in 2016, fueled by a staggering 21 percent rise in the death rate from drug overdoses, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Thursday.

The United States has not seen two years of declining life expectancy since 1962 and 1963, when influenza caused an inordinate number of deaths. In 1993, there was a one-year drop during the worst of the AIDS epidemic.

“I think we should take it very seriously,” said Bob Anderson, chief of the Mortality Statistics Branch at the National Center for Health Statistics, which is part of the CDC. “If you look at the other developed countries in the world, they’re not seeing this kind of thing. Life expectancy is going up.”

The development is a dismal sign for the United States, which boasts some of the world’s highest spending on medical care, and more evidence of the toll the nation’s opioid crisis is exacting on younger and middle-aged Americans, experts said.

More than 42,000 Americans died of opioid overdoses alone in 2016, a 28 percent increase over 2015. When deaths from drugs such as cocaine, methamphetamine and benzodiazepines are included, the overall increase was 21 percent.
 


The war on drugs in the United States has been a failure that has ruined lives, filled prisons and cost a fortune. It started during the Nixon administration with the idea that, because drugs are bad for people, they should be difficult to obtain. As a result, it became a war on supply.

...

Studies show that the United States has among the highest rates of drug use in the world. But even as restricting supply has failed to curb abuse, aggressive policing has led to thousands of young drug users filling American prisons, where they learn how to become real criminals.
 
Narconomics: How To Run a Drug Cartel by Tom Wainwright

narconomics-drug.jpg

a book review by James H. McDonald: Narconomics: How to Run a Drug Cartel

Cartels are businesses that exist on the wildly entrepreneurial illegal side of capitalism. The power of Narconomics: How to Run a Drug Cartel is its synthesis of existing materials, in-depth original ethnographic journalism, and a rendering of cartels and the narcoeconomy as an entrepreneurial corporate venture subject to the same analysis as any business. Tom Wainwright engages the fraught War on Drugs with a fresh take and incisive analysis.

Wainwright does a masterful job of demonstrating how cartels run like businesses with many of the same challenges as their legal corporate counterparts. They must recruit and manage personnel, deal with government regulations and interventions, have reliable suppliers, fathom the challenge of competitors, and keep clients happy. Operating under diverse conditions and approaches, he shows how cartels take on different strategies to face these challenges.

[...]

In closing Wainwright underscores a number of mistakes that politicians and policy makers have consistently made since the launch of the War on Drugs:
  1. The singular obsession with supply rather than demand. As we’ve seen illegal drug prices do not rise markedly when production is squeezed. When prices do rise, consumption does not necessarily drop. So supply-side enforcement simply does not make a strong dent in the illegal drug business.
  2. Early investment in drug enforcement and jailing but not on the rehabilitation and reintegration of users and others in the supply chain.
  3. National strategies cannot combat a global problem; a problem similar to the on-going challenge of terrorism.
  4. Prohibition does not equal control of a problem.
Sound recommendations all.
 


From opium to alcohol to tobacco, mind-altering substances have been used for as long as people have preferred pleasant feelings to unpleasant ones. All the while, efforts to eliminate drugs have failed. Like it or not, drug use is here to stay.

The governing Liberals will discuss this issue at their national convention next weekend. In the face of a devastating epidemic of overdose deaths, they will debate a resolution to decriminalize drug use; in other words, to approach it as a health problem rather than a criminal one.

Politicians and the public often oversimplify the decriminalization debate, assuming those who don’t forbid drug use must therefore condone it. But we should all be able to agree on a few things: it’s better if fewer people have drug-related problems, and it’s better if fewer people die.

Let’s reflect on what criminalizing drug use actually accomplishes.
 


In 1995, France made it so any doctor could prescribe buprenorphine without any special licensing or training. Buprenorphine, a first-line treatment for opioid addiction, is a medication that reduces cravings for opioids without becoming addictive itself.

With the change in policy, the majority of buprenorphine prescribers in France became primary-care doctors, rather than addiction specialists or psychiatrists. Suddenly, about 10 times as many addicted patients began receiving medication-assisted treatment, and half the country’s heroin users were being treated. Within four years, overdose deaths had declined by 79 percent.

Of course, France has a socialized medical system in which many users don’t have to worry about cost, and the country also developed a syringe-exchange program around the same time. Some of the users did sell or inject the buprenorphine (as opposed to taking it orally, as indicated), though these practices didn’t result in nearly as many deaths as heroin does.
 
All drugs should be legal or at the very minimum decriminalized. This ongoing war on drugs is all about money. If they decriminalized drugs in the US; crime, disease, addiction would all go down. We’d also have less non violent criminals filling up our prison system. It’s just crazy and I’m not sure why the public isn’t pushing more for reform
 
The government is in secret talks to possibly ban kratom, suspecting it's is not the answer to the opioid crisis, but the start of a new one.

 
Suboxone was supposed to be the cure all for opioid addicts. When I got clean about 10 years ago I went on suboxone and it definitely helps. The problem is that doctors over prescribe it and people sell the majority of it for drug money anyway. Nobody needs 32mg or subs. 1-4mg is plenty for long term treatment. Maybe 8-16mg for the 1st week kicking the habit.

The other thing doctors don’t tell you or don’t know themselves is that suboxone is a bitch to stop. When I came off that shit after 3 years of taking 1-2mg a day, I was in severe withdrawal for 3 months. The next 3 months was a struggle. The final 6 months was all emotional and physiological symptoms from suicide thoughts to vertigo to depression. It took about 12-14 months for my body to regulate and adjust.

That stuff will help addicts that are willing to quit. But most just calculate day time hours meaning they know it’s a opioid blocker so they take it when they don’t have money or need to function for work. Then they’ll stop it 12-18 hours before their quick 1-2 day relapse then jump back on suboxone again.

Problem with these doctors is they should have ex criminals and addicts teach them some street smarts. The big medical books leave a lot out! Lol
 
Kratom should be substituted for methadone and suboxone. These chemicals are probably so bad for our bodies and they are extremely difficult to stop and sometime impossible to stop.

Kratom or (speciosa mitragyna) is a natural botanical that’s been used in South east Asia for centuries for pain, energy, opioid abuse treatment, anti oxidant, any many other uses. It does come with mild physical withdrawal symptoms with prolonged use but there isn’t 1 case of a death by Kratom Alone. Every case where someone dies they found countless other substances in their bodies. It’s impossible to die from Kratom,
What’s fascinating is their prescription drugs kill thousands every year but the media is hung up on 12 reported cases since 1990 all in which involved other drugs.

Big pharmaceutical companies are at war and throwing out a lot of garbage online to scare the public because they know they are losing billions with people transitioning from suboxone/methadone to Kratom. The evil pharma companies are even trying to synthesize Kratom to formulate their own pulls from it. That can’t be profitable if raw leaf Kratom is still legal. It’s a threat to their big opioid business and in time I’m sure they’ll win sending millions that take Kratom back to suboxone.

The pharmaceutical industry is a double edged sword. It saves a lot of people and kills a lot of people.
 


AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands - On a quiet alley in east Amsterdam, a security guard stands watch outside a brick office building, which 75 men and women visit twice a day to smoke or shoot up government-funded heroin.

Public-health experts in the Netherlands say free distribution is one reason that drug-related deaths are far less common than in the United States. The program also has reduced crime and improved the quality of life for many users, according to Ellen van den Hoogen, who runs the clinic.

Is it an answer for the United States, where the opioid epidemic continues to claim more than 100 lives every day? Maybe it should be, said van den Hoogen. "It's been an enormous success. I think it would work elsewhere."

Indeed, it has worked elsewhere. The Netherlands program started in 1998, modeled after a similar, successful effort in Switzerland. Several other European countries, including Germany and the United Kingdom, have adopted the model as well.

The concept is rooted in several key ideas:
 


AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands - On a quiet alley in east Amsterdam, a security guard stands watch outside a brick office building, which 75 men and women visit twice a day to smoke or shoot up government-funded heroin.

Public-health experts in the Netherlands say free distribution is one reason that drug-related deaths are far less common than in the United States. The program also has reduced crime and improved the quality of life for many users, according to Ellen van den Hoogen, who runs the clinic.

Is it an answer for the United States, where the opioid epidemic continues to claim more than 100 lives every day? Maybe it should be, said van den Hoogen. "It's been an enormous success. I think it would work elsewhere."

Indeed, it has worked elsewhere. The Netherlands program started in 1998, modeled after a similar, successful effort in Switzerland. Several other European countries, including Germany and the United Kingdom, have adopted the model as well.

The concept is rooted in several key ideas:


"dutch cut overdose deaths by dispensing pure heroin."

that headline made think of something I came across recently.
the overdose crisis is driven in large part by fentanyl, which is a direct result of the failed war on drugs.


UofT Talks (@UofT_Talks) | Twitter
 
Back
Top