In reference to time:
We just don't know - Because God has chosen for us not to know. If He decides differently, I'm sure you will be one of the many to learn firsthand.
Last edited:
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Why there almost certainly is No God!!
- Thread starter Desibaba
- Start date
We just don't know - Because God has chosen for us not to know. If He decides differently, I'm sure you will be one of the many to learn firsthand.
Stretch
Subscriber
Right.
We don't know the intricate details of how God keeps time.
Who cares?
I know that everyone who fails to bow their knee, confess their sins, and ask forgiveness with the knowledge that they are powerless to save themselves and are accountable to their creator.....are going to burn in hell forever.
And I know that anyone who compared God to a comic book super hero will regret the moment they chose to do so.
More about God's Time.
Stretch
Subscriber
All the talk about time seems so irrelevant to me.
The original question asked was: how would God create the world in 7 days...if days didn't exist yet.
I don't get it, since God created "days" on the first day. His first action was to create light and darkness, divide the light from the darkness, then name the two periods.
The original question asked was: how would God create the world in 7 days...if days didn't exist yet.
I don't get it, since God created "days" on the first day. His first action was to create light and darkness, divide the light from the darkness, then name the two periods.
Yes sir I have, not front to back 100% but it was part of my college curriculum...I'm not going to argue on religion and or politics as it is different for everyone in this world...that's why there ate 100's of religions...I'm just saying that you might as well pray to one of the many religions, as one is bound to be right.....
Stretch
Subscriber
Agreed.
I don't know why this thread is even here. Since it profits very little IMO.
It just feels wrong for someone who believes as I do, to stand by and do nothing when someone likens the creator of the universe to a comic book character.
Was only a reference to be a troll
Stretch
Subscriber
nano
New Member
The all supreme being is a flying invisible unicorn. He loves you. But if you deny he exists, you will be punished for an infinite amount of time after your death.
nano
New Member
In all seriousness, God almost certainly does not exist no more that Zues or Ra.
I have asked for hard evidence my whole life and all anyone has to show me is an archaic book written by bronze age nomads that is full of terrible stories and rules, and that isn't proof of anything.
No one can prove that god is real no more than invisible unicorns or flying spaghetti monsters.
I've been told "well you just have to have faith! god doesn't have to prove himself you just need to believe in him"
What the fuck? I can say the same thing about the fairies in my garden. What a load of crap.
Sorry but I don't have time for fictional cult nonsense. Science is real. And more of the sheeple in this world waking up to that realization everyday.
I have asked for hard evidence my whole life and all anyone has to show me is an archaic book written by bronze age nomads that is full of terrible stories and rules, and that isn't proof of anything.
No one can prove that god is real no more than invisible unicorns or flying spaghetti monsters.
I've been told "well you just have to have faith! god doesn't have to prove himself you just need to believe in him"
What the fuck? I can say the same thing about the fairies in my garden. What a load of crap.
Sorry but I don't have time for fictional cult nonsense. Science is real. And more of the sheeple in this world waking up to that realization everyday.
Stretch
Subscriber
In 40-50 years we will know for sure...won't we?
BTW...show me a piece of SCIENTIFIC evidence which supports Macro-Evolution?
nano
New Member
here's everything you would ever need to know about the term macro-evolution, with proper scientific references and works cited at the bottom. worth poking around if you are truly interested in educating yourself.
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent
nano
New Member
I can't click on that link
But either way, Richard Dawkins puts intelligent design to rest in his book The God Delusion
Its really nothing more that a concept for people who look at the complication in life, believe its far too complicated to have come about via genetic mutation and evolution on geological time frames, the whole only works with the sum of all the the parts, and since the complication so intricate and the basic understand of evolution is missing, than a magical sky wizard must have made everything exactly as we see it today
I have no problem with people who subscribe to that, but I don't. and Dawkins' books can explain it a whole lot better than I can.
But either way, Richard Dawkins puts intelligent design to rest in his book The God Delusion
Its really nothing more that a concept for people who look at the complication in life, believe its far too complicated to have come about via genetic mutation and evolution on geological time frames, the whole only works with the sum of all the the parts, and since the complication so intricate and the basic understand of evolution is missing, than a magical sky wizard must have made everything exactly as we see it today
I have no problem with people who subscribe to that, but I don't. and Dawkins' books can explain it a whole lot better than I can.
Stretch
Subscriber
And your theory of macro evolution is equally absurd.
If I told you the car I drive came into being because a long time ago a super-compacted atom was stuffed with....cloth...and metal...and plastics...
Then the aforementioned atom exploded (for unknown reasons, and in spite of the insane gravity which would be present in an atom which is so incredibly dense/massive). after the explosion over millions of hears the dust swirled and lighting struck the metal forming the welds for frame....the rubber rounded itself into tires, then wrapped itself around the rims...
See how ridiculous this sounds??
Right...but MY theory is the crazy one?
I guess its not a perfect analogy....since a car is WAY MORE complex than....say...an amoeba. Oh wait....actually even the simplest organism known to man; an organism that you, and Dick Dawkins would say came into being spontsneously (something which has never been observed...not even close). Even THAT simple....single- celled organism...is infinitely more complex than the International Space Station (commonly thought to be the most complex thing ever built).
You don't like the idea that there is a creator.
A supreme being.
Because if I am right....you are accountable for everything you ever will do or have done. If there is a creator...then we owe him everything.
You would rather kill the conscience God gave you and rationalize your desire to live your life his you see fit. You want to be the master of your own fate. And you are/will be, for the next couple decades.
Its cool. I was just like you at one time.
You should look into some "young earth" science, and how it pertains to the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Last edited:
Evolution is NOT I REPEAT a SCIENTIFIC FACT, but it is a bonified scientific THEORY.
It should NOT be confused with "NATURAL SELECTION" as DARWIN himself described his own "discovery", now termed "survival of the fittest".
Evolutionists if you can legitimately describe for me, or anyone else, how the eye "evolved" from ZIPPO to one with "compound features" which is common to every creature capable of "sight" as we understand that sense today, there is a Nobel prize awaiting you!
Jim
It should NOT be confused with "NATURAL SELECTION" as DARWIN himself described his own "discovery", now termed "survival of the fittest".
Evolutionists if you can legitimately describe for me, or anyone else, how the eye "evolved" from ZIPPO to one with "compound features" which is common to every creature capable of "sight" as we understand that sense today, there is a Nobel prize awaiting you!
Jim
Stretch
Subscriber
Evolution is NOT I REPEAT a SCIENTIFIC FACT, but it is a bonified scientific THEORY.
It should NOT be confused with "NATURAL SELECTION" as DARWIN himself described his own "discovery", now termed "survival of the fittest".
Evolutionists if you can legitimately describe for me, or anyone else, how the eye "evolved" from ZIPPO to one with "compound features" which is common to every creature capable of "sight" as we understand that sense today, there is a Nobel prize awaiting you!
Jim
Here is what one expert had to say about the evolution of the eye
Was the expert some misguided Bible thumper??
Nope. It was Charles Darwin.
Oh Christ! If there is a Supreme being he most certainly is not the Christian or Jewish or Muslim god and he doesn't give a shit if you go to church.
Religion is man-made. Books with stories rationalized by men who didn't know anything about science...these books attempted to explain the unknown. Nothing more....man has bastardized these religions into what they are today....big business, a reason to kill others, a system of control.
If you look to the bible as your answer for how things came to be I think you're a moron. If you think evolution is all inclusive and capable of explaining everything I think you're equally misguided.
Religion is man-made. Books with stories rationalized by men who didn't know anything about science...these books attempted to explain the unknown. Nothing more....man has bastardized these religions into what they are today....big business, a reason to kill others, a system of control.
If you look to the bible as your answer for how things came to be I think you're a moron. If you think evolution is all inclusive and capable of explaining everything I think you're equally misguided.
That is one of many reasons it remains a theory, you can't legitimately and scientifically explain how a leg may develop from another descendants tail yet not have any reasonable explanation for the "evolution" of a fundamental sense such as sight
Stretch
Subscriber
Not to mention inexplicable lack of evidence in the fossil record.
There should be MILLIONS of fossils which are "in between". Instead nearly every fossil we find is a known animal, of a distinct species.
