MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Dr. John Crisler Arrest - 'The War on Men'
- Thread starter coolcat20
- Start date
HARRY BLOOM
New Member
I dont have the slghtest idea what this is all about that LORD OF THE FORUMS thing struck me as a bit arrogant. Not that its a bad thing.Lord of HIS forum; sure: Lord of THIS forum. Wouldnt have happened.
http://www.musclechatroom.com/forum/showthread.php?21026-Dr.-John-Crisler-Has-Been-Wrongfully-Convicted-of-Domestic-Assault!&p=185796#post185796
We're waiting, Johnny Boy, we are waiting.
cvictorg
New Member
No - not a lawyer - glad you enjoy my posts
Yes. But, there is no way Crisler is going to jail. There might be some minor reprimand, IMO.
cvictorg
New Member
After what he's said about the courts, police, etc. one cannot be sure.
It appears Crisler is being very paranoid! A whole lot of post housecleaning. Editing and deleting multiple posts (10+), some from weeks ago. I wonder why? What is NEXT?
Alot more housecleaning, more than a half-dozen posts gone today. Crisler is quickly rising up the PARANOIA scale. As the "Lord of the Forum," he is warning his subjects the same fate awaits them.
I'm just curious, when all is said and done, if he does prove his innocence, what will you say then?
So far from what I have seen and read I'm not convinced either way. But I find it hard to believe he (or anyone else) would be doing this if he weren't truly innocent.
I'm waiting for all of his recordings before making any judgment.
Oh, and in Michigan when someone calls the police for a domestic dispute, someone has got to go to jail. That usually ends up being the one who did not make the call regardless who was in the wrong. I've seen it happen.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
So far from what I have seen and read I'm not convinced either way. But I find it hard to believe he (or anyone else) would be doing this if he weren't truly innocent.
I'm waiting for all of his recordings before making any judgment.
Oh, and in Michigan when someone calls the police for a domestic dispute, someone has got to go to jail. That usually ends up being the one who did not make the call regardless who was in the wrong. I've seen it happen.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
If the Michigan domestic violence laws are like domestic violence laws on the west coast someone doesnt "have" to go to jail unless a crime has been commited. The state becomes the victim if there is probable cause that a crime has been commited, in the past officers would respond and arrest someone and then later, after the couple had made up, there would be unwilling victims and then the cycle repeats. So the states decided to become the victim in these cases for a couple of reasons, to allow a cooling off period (jail) and to avoid the liability of two combatants remaining in the home and one of them getting killed later that same night.
What Doc J is doing is not uncommon, he just has a bigger platform and audience, I've heard that same sh%# over and over again. I am pretty certain we are not getting the full story here and I find it hard to believe that the Police Officers are that corrupt. Not saying it can't happen but it's usually not multiple officers just one in a bunch. Just appears he is blaming everyone but himself for what happened that night and for the record the first thing to go when you are intoxicated is your judgment, you can be buzzed or drunk under the legal limit -.08. Thats just the number the state gave it for presumption.
What Doc J is doing is not uncommon, he just has a bigger platform and audience, I've heard that same sh%# over and over again. I am pretty certain we are not getting the full story here and I find it hard to believe that the Police Officers are that corrupt. Not saying it can't happen but it's usually not multiple officers just one in a bunch. Just appears he is blaming everyone but himself for what happened that night and for the record the first thing to go when you are intoxicated is your judgment, you can be buzzed or drunk under the legal limit -.08. Thats just the number the state gave it for presumption.
Don't know what I would say then. Not until "then" happens. In the meantime... When all this started I was more on his side than hers. I didn't know Crisler... Now that he has posted all of his supposedly defense, it appears he is screaming to loud!!
The old rule " If the law is against you, pound the facts. If the facts are against you, pound the law. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table!" comes to mind.
Also, discovering who he is on the internet, he seems to be very egotistical. Plus he's acting like an idiot!
I hope he keeps it up, for it's very entertaining and it gives me something to do. Yes, I have a life, but it's not very busy right now!
Why no word from Crisler regarding his hearing today for a probation violation? The answer is simple, it is a CONSPIRACY. Crisler is going DOWN. And, he is taking his "subjects" with him. In addition to his admission of violating his probation today, Crisler continues his paranoid post housecleaning. What's up with that?
The "Take Heed" post is now #187. It was #201 - #193: Dr. John Crisler Arrest - 'The War on Men'
CRISLER, WHERE IS THAT EVIDENCE YOU HAVE BEEN PROMISING? MY GUESS, THERE IS NONE.
CRISLER, IN CASE YOU FORGOT, YOU ARE A CONVICTED WOMAN BEATER. AND, NOW THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS IT.
WHAT ABOUT THE RIB FRACTURE. WHERE IS THE UPDATE? OR ARE YOU SAYING A RIB FRACTURE WAS SELF-INFLICTED. AND, THAT THUMB INJURY!
The "Take Heed" post is now #187. It was #201 - #193: Dr. John Crisler Arrest - 'The War on Men'
CRISLER, WHERE IS THAT EVIDENCE YOU HAVE BEEN PROMISING? MY GUESS, THERE IS NONE.
CRISLER, IN CASE YOU FORGOT, YOU ARE A CONVICTED WOMAN BEATER. AND, NOW THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS IT.
WHAT ABOUT THE RIB FRACTURE. WHERE IS THE UPDATE? OR ARE YOU SAYING A RIB FRACTURE WAS SELF-INFLICTED. AND, THAT THUMB INJURY!
Last edited:
CRISLER, WHY DID YOU EDIT YOUR POSTS FOR:
Dr. John Crisler Arrest - 'The War on Men'
Do you really believe that since you deleted it, there would be NO record. ROTFLMAOPIMP
Dr. John Crisler Arrest - 'The War on Men'
Do you really believe that since you deleted it, there would be NO record. ROTFLMAOPIMP
Last edited:
I'm not sure sure. We shall see. I have seen nearly the same thing happen to a friend of mine, except it was the other way around. She was arrested when it was his doing and he called the police. I can see this being the same way. If a 220 pound man beat a 110 pound woman I highly doubt she would have looked as good as she did in those photos.
Unlike you, I will wait until I hear the rest of the audio and still photo evidence to come to any kind of conclusion. Because anyone who makes judgment without all the evidence is nothing more than a fool.
cvictorg
New Member
You know of course he had a hearing today due to a bench warrant being issued for a probation violation.
Your last sentence is pretty ignorant!! As long as one doesn't hit a person in he face there will likely be no visible evidence to the public. We oft think of getting "beat up" by black eyes, fat lips, broken noses, facial abrasions, etc. One could easily hace the shit beaten out of them without "facial evidence."
One must admit that at the very least, Crisler loses big time from this one!!!
Yes, but that has buying to do with the original incident.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
cvictorg
New Member
The original incident - the one he was convicted on - resulted in his being on probation so they are connected
Similar threads
Sponsors
Latest posts
-
-
MESO-Rx Sponsor GenericAsia - International & US Domestic- Latest: accidentaljedi173
-
