lol good try, you just did ur straw man argument... but AGAIN, using differing animal comparisons does not work. what we can do is compare animals within the same species. when we do this we see that higher the IGF the shorter the life (within that species) we also see people with NO gh/igf die early..
again, your right there have been no studies on healthy people taking GH. but your straw man argument of using "old people" doesn't apply here as we are talking mid life taking GH for longevity when we know this to be bad..
why is GH bad for longevity?
-blood sugar, taking GH often leads to blood sugar issues. the higher your blood sugar gets the worse inflammation etc you get leading to disease.
-organ growth we know this happens and we know it kills people sooner
-bigger people with higher IGF for more of there life die sooner, no ifs ands or buts
-increase cancer growth. high GH and IGF is why kids cancer is soo bad.. why do first world nations with obesity and high IGF GH get more cancer than skinnier third world nations?
-why do castrated animals live longer with lower IGF and TEst levels?
- small people live longest, small people stay active the longest.
when everything points in one direction this in science is called a validated. this is what we have here..
if you test your IGF and its lower than reference range and your 50yo and your tendons are snapping or have osteoporosis and are wasting away, then yes you will live longer with supplementing GH.. but if your normal and young and your IGF is high for all your life your chances of dying earlier than your peers is likely.
lol its so funny you guys want to lie to yourselves about GH use and anything that questions that core belief cannot be true and take snippets of what some YouTube says and not completely understand whats going on.
at any rate, no substantiated evidence elevating GH or IGF makes non deficient people live longer.. we know that
and we have alot of evidence pointing to the contrary... denial of evidence is what I call denial yes, esp when no evidence to the contrary
on a side note as ur ramble about "science", you clearly have not conducted science, probably read your first paper in 2020 during pandemic.. and since then have gone off the deep end about science as you never developed an understanding of how it works and that it is an ever evolving thing.
anyway, even the most progressive DRs will tell you elevating your GH/igf is likely to kill you sooner. folks often conflate things like well DRs are RXing it for longevity after blood tests indicate LOW#s in 65yo, so therefore should be good for everyone all the time... if looked into it further and follower the top 15% of "in range" IGF people and compare that to lower 15% of in range and seethe lives longest
This also goes for testosterone, with injections you target say 950 as per normal range. but somehow folks forget that the "normal range" is only for a few hours a day not 24/7. and we can also note that even the people with upper range natural testosterone levels will die sooner than bottom normal range baring no other metabolic issues. that is to say a guy with natural 950 will be 950 for 3-4 hrs a day, the rest he will sit around 450-550 or so. so if you had a guy that was naturally 950 at supper time (like injections provide) this would be someone who would test 1600-1800 at his peak in the am... so IGF will be ALOT higher even though targeting "trt" levels. so despite you thinking you are in a healthy normal range you are actually very much super physiological in how much useable test you have in your body compared to upper limit natural person. most DRs know this but TRT pill mills obv dont follow this idea and is now in the zeitgeist, but they will start cracking down on this esp now as instead of old school 1 time every 2 weeks guys are injecting 3 times per week with double or 4x the dosage of old school 200-250 per 2 weeks so dont have the periods of lower testosterone that natural people have.