Dr. John Crisler Arrest - 'The War on Men'

Fast-forward to 5 years in the future:

Crisler is convicted of cannabilizing his own patient and putting their limbs into a stew.

"This is the war on humans!!!!!! These alien bastards!!!!!!! Earth has been overtaken by aliens and they are out to get me!!!!"
 
Psychologist: "Dr Crisler, you seem to suffer from a textbook case of narcissism"

Crisler: "Hold on a second. I am replying to posts on my message forum. This is the war on men!!!!"

Psychologist: "Dr Crisler, is it true your idea of sex is standing infront of the mirror and masturbating to your own reflection?"

Crisler: (as he is furiously beating off infront of a mirror) "Whaaa... Whaaa Whaaat?"

Psychologist: "Dr Crisler, shouldnt your judgement in medicine be questioned as your judgement in women is incredibly poor?"

Crisler: "That DeJong bitch! She drunken me ! No one asks how my hand is doing after she hit it with her face!!!"

Psychologist: "Ok, your time is up..."
 
He admits to reading other sites regarding his troubles. Does anyone know of other sites besides Meso?


There are a couple of short posts about it on steroids.com in the HRT thread.
 
"Abuse of women".....??? Really, you have to wake up. What about the abuse of man!?!!? RACING IS RUBBING....!

1. Women choose me for strength unless they are so perverted by the bull dyke liberal values we hold today.
2. She knows what he needs, what he is capable of, and how to make him happy or angry.
3. They are raised to be CHILDREN especially is spoiled ROMAN states like the US today.
4. She CAN go, COULD go, could choose not to alienate him.

She is not so upset when hes out pissin in the lawn after drinking that beer - thus the PRIMARY REASON no one is breaking into her home assraping her kids in front of her....!

If the cops just came cause the neighbors then fine. But if she childishly called them, and is attempting to slander, libel, and defame him after the trusting BOND of "Marriage" - then she should be taken out back and given a REAL BEATING. If she makes her own money then fine - GET THE FUCK OUT... Otherwise recognize you stupid bitch. It aint hard to keep a man happy. Its even easier to hurt his feelings as a wife.

While there ARE some guys that are just evil and unhappy and like to physically abuse. I hate to say it - BUT THESE ARE THE CASES YOU WILL NEVER HEAR ABOUT, and because she knows what a betrayal would get her from a guy like that. So women need to fucking grow up............!:mad:

Abuse of woman in this country is terrible, but the legal abuse is also prevalent.

This is a great 'Whodunnit' deal, if we are entertained by those, but we really dont know the real deal. When looking at bogus trials, one only has to recall the O.J. Simpson fiasco or more recently the Casey Anthony deal...At this point do you think George Zimmerman is going to get a fair trial?...anyway...

All of the posts here seem credible, but there is also bias here against Crisler...IMO. How would you really feel if you didn't know him?

It appears she was drunk, he was drunk, and they're ex's...just another great night together! Who wouldn't have seen this coming?

Who did what to who? We will probably never know, but I know a few guys that have been railroaded. I dont condone Crislers Video expression, but gett'n the shaft by a woman is hard to suck up. IMO. They may have less muscular strength, they may be slight of build, but the girls have learned to be just as powerful as a man, without flinching, when payback is in order. Just my bullets as I see them.
 
He admits to reading other sites regarding his troubles. Does anyone know of other sites besides Meso?


There are a couple of short posts about it on steroids.com in the HRT thread.

Yes it is on other sites but they are not obsessed with the topic like this site. They are more into helping others with their health problems.

This site needs to ban the Crisler name from being typed its all you people can post about. Give it a break.
 
http://www.musclechatroom.com/forum/showthread.php?21026-Dr.-John-Crisler-Has-Been-Wrongfully-Convicted-of-Domestic-Assault!/page13

Originally Posted by ScottHart
Dr. Crisler

Do you have any recourse through federal channels ?
My attorney is on that.

This is a civil rights matter.
 
From the video editing, was there a rib fracture? [It should be noted that often rib fractures do not show up on plain film x-rays. They require MRI. Also, it is very common not to have any skin sign (erythema/bruising) overlying the rib fracture. There is typically tenderness, the severity varies.] But, was there a RIB FRACTURE? If there was a fracture, how was it determined?

Bhavnagri SJ, Mohammed TL. When and how to image a suspected broken rib. Cleve Clin J Med 2009;76(5):309-14. When and how to image a suspected broken rib

Radiographic confirmation of rib fracture is often clinically irrelevant in patients who appear to have no complications or associated injuries. However, it is essential in a number of cases, especially when the clinical presentation and history raise suspicion of complications such as organ damage, or if the patient has other risk factors or conditions for which the precise information would help in management decisions. The authors discuss when to order imaging and which imaging test to order.

10286

Did he testify???? Since he admits to reading the forums and this is the only forum I can find that has discussed his CONVICTION for AGGRAVATED DOMESTIC ASSAULT. It appears he is loathe to answer this very simple question.

Also, the heavily edited video states and implies there WAS a rib fracture. What does Crisler have to say about this? [In marked contrast to the video, rib fractures often do NOT show on plain films. Other techniques are required - http://eradiology.bidmc.harvard.edu/LearningLab/musculo/Garcia.pdf So much for their [self-serving] medical knowledge.]

Is Crisler in violation of his sentencing?
 
Last edited:
Bhavnagri SJ, Mohammed TL. When and how to image a suspected broken rib. Cleve Clin J Med 2009;76(5):309-14. When and how to image a suspected broken rib

Radiographic confirmation of rib fracture is often clinically irrelevant in patients who appear to have no complications or associated injuries. However, it is essential in a number of cases, especially when the clinical presentation and history raise suspicion of complications such as organ damage, or if the patient has other risk factors or conditions for which the precise information would help in management decisions. The authors discuss when to order imaging and which imaging test to order.
 
Did he testify???? Since he admits to reading the forums and this is the only forum I can find that has discussed his CONVICTION for AGGRAVATED DOMESTIC ASSAULT. It appears he is loathe to answer this very simple question.

Also, the heavily edited video states and implies there WAS a rib fracture. What does Crisler have to say about this? [In marked contrast to the video, rib fractures often do NOT show on plain films. Other techniques are required - http://eradiology.bidmc.harvard.edu/LearningLab/musculo/Garcia.pdf So much for their [self-serving] medical knowledge.]

Is Crisler in violation of his sentencing?

Why does it matter if he testified or not? There are many reasons that a lawyer may not want his client to testify. If he didn't (and I don't know if he did or not) maybe it was on the advise of his lawyer. I don't really see how it matters one way or the other.

I have not watched the video yet, but when you keep calling it a "heavily edited" video are you referring to it being paused and text added for commentary? If so that is not really "editing" the video. Your comment of it being "edited" is misleading unless you are referring to something else.

How would posting information of public record and publicly giving his side of the story on his forum violate any sentencing? I don't see how that could possibly be prohibited.
 
Did he testify???? Since he admits to reading the forums and this is the only forum I can find that has discussed his CONVICTION for AGGRAVATED DOMESTIC ASSAULT. It appears he is loathe to answer this very simple question.

Also, the heavily edited video states and implies there WAS a rib fracture. What does Crisler have to say about this? [In marked contrast to the video, rib fractures often do NOT show on plain films. Other techniques are required - http://eradiology.bidmc.harvard.edu/LearningLab/musculo/Garcia.pdf So much for their [self-serving] medical knowledge.]

Is Crisler in violation of his sentencing?

Here's your answer.....

http://www.musclechatroom.com/forum/showthread.php?21026-Dr.-John-Crisler-Has-Been-Wrongfully-Convicted-of-Domestic-Assault!&p=185573#post185573

Dr. John Crisler said:
She absolutely insisted I not testify.

THAT was how Stacia Buchanan was able to never bring up the issue foundational to the situation--and the Defense-- that a man has the right to protect his property and his own body from a woman who is attempting to destroy both.

It's the Law--plain and simple. But the jury never heard a word of it. It was over before I knew it.

And now the Court is doing everything it can to protect her. Of course--she brings them convictions.
 
Last edited:
If Crisler is "argu[ing] that h[is] attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by advising h[im] not to testify," it will be an uphill and an almost assured unsuccessful appeal. Crisler's statements make him appear to have been some sort of "zombie" during the trial. This was a criminal proceeding, but we are to believe an educated individual took no part in his defense. The court will not buy it, but good luck.

People v. Licavoli, 2012 WL 1758757 (Mich.App. May 17, 2012) (NO. 304376) Not Reported. http://www.michbar.org/opinions/appeals/2012/051712/51711.pdf


Now, what about that RIB FRACTURE?

[Crisler stated there was a new judge. So, now, this new judge is acting in a conspiracy with the others. Interesting!]
 
Last edited:
If Crisler is "argu[ing] that h[is] attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by advising h[im] not to testify," it will be an uphill and an almost assured unsuccessful appeal. Crisler's statements make him appear to have been some sort of "zombie" during the trial. This was a criminal proceeding, but we are to believe an educated individual took no part in his defense. The court will not buy it, but good luck.

People v. Licavoli, 2012 WL 1758757 (Mich.App. May 17, 2012) (NO. 304376) Not Reported. http://www.michbar.org/opinions/appeals/2012/051712/51711.pdf


Now, what about that RIB FRACTURE?

[Crisler stated there was a new judge. So, now, this new judge is acting in a conspiracy with the others. Interesting!]

It sounds to me like there is much more to it than that.
 
It sounds to me like there is much more to it than that.

I agree.

The video is surely not going to be any evidence for his appeal. BTW: By the police clock, the video length is ~23 minutes. Yet, the video is ~40 minutes. So much for the video not be heavily edited. There is nothing in this video that is helpful for his case. IMO, it is damaging to his case. I would not for a minute attempt to use the video as a defense.

The appeal will depend upon evidence that was NOT presented. And, that counsel was ineffective for failure to present this evidence. Now, will Crisler post the evidence that supports his claim. I guess we will wait and see.

I understand Crisler complains he was not given a Miranda warning. This is a non-starter. When interviewed by the police, it was a he said/she said. I would think it was not until Crisler implicated himself was he charged. Anyway, IMO, the Miranda will not wash.

Now, what about the RIB FRACTURE?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top