Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

So now Jano turned a new leaf?

Can't really say with certainty, myself.

i've always believed that he has the knowledge and equipment to test samples. Looking at the results of blind samples, he would need to have some sort of psychic ability to accurately hit upon each compound. Especially blended compounds.

Obviously, he made a horrible decision with the fake GH results. But he didn't do it because he was bored and had nothing better to do. There had to be a reason for him to make that choice, and i don't recall ever reading a detailed explanation for that.
 
Hey, stupid. Get your worthless ass back to your own thread, and next time, before you open your cock licker, read the entire thread before replying.

i have no problem with Jano. i want to know the real story behind the GH debacle.

Now run along and go play source in your dead thread.

hello spammer number 1
Do not tell a crap, and do not lie here!
 
Then there's master.on. I won't insult him, even though he would probably deserve it, as I acknowledge he has serious mental issues and is on a treatment. In my opinion he is the antithesis of what this forum is supposed to be about - harm reduction - as he spreads falsehoods and plain bad advice, but until Millard decides there's some course of action to be taken, all I can do is to block him.

Master.on has behaved the same way against every other tester (analyzer, W&M). I believe he's a labmax rep or something. The best course of action is to ignore him and pay attention to the actual critics that may appear, if any.
 
Anyone else read BOP and see that DWBO banned Jano cause he made some mistakes?

Way to stay out in front of this Jano. Or are you hoping it stays hidden. What gives?

I’ll just leave this here. Cut and pasted from a post made yesterday.

—————————————————————

“This is the email I sent Janoshik after I reviewed test results :

The previous reading at 200 mg/ml is accurate. Ran full retest. Result for sample Y is also wrong and should be multiplied by 1.18.

I will issue fixed reports and refund as soon as possible, but please, give me a day or two, I haven't slept in a while and I'm overloaded in the lab.


---


Problem was with the standard for mast e mixed this week, I am not sure what exactly is the issue:
1. it was weighted improperly - I am overloaded with samples, so I used assistance in the lab and it's possible that's where it went wrong
2. the standard was too bad


I'm leaning towards the first option.

With best regards,

Janoshik

WARNING: Only reply to emails from info@janoshik.com or domain janoshik.com “
 
Anyone else read BOP and see that DWBO banned Jano cause he made some mistakes?

Way to stay out in front of this Jano. Or are you hoping it stays hidden. What gives?
I know it might come off as a surprise to you, but I might have some things other than posting here to do, like sleeping and working.

Anyway Meso was down until now. Don't think there's anything to add to what I have written.
 
Anyone else read BOP and see that DWBO banned Jano cause he made some mistakes?

Way to stay out in front of this Jano. Or are you hoping it stays hidden. What gives?

I’ll just leave this here. Cut and pasted from a post made yesterday.

—————————————————————

“This is the email I sent Janoshik after I reviewed test results :

The previous reading at 200 mg/ml is accurate. Ran full retest. Result for sample Y is also wrong and should be multiplied by 1.18.

I will issue fixed reports and refund as soon as possible, but please, give me a day or two, I haven't slept in a while and I'm overloaded in the lab.


---


Problem was with the standard for mast e mixed this week, I am not sure what exactly is the issue:
1. it was weighted improperly - I am overloaded with samples, so I used assistance in the lab and it's possible that's where it went wrong
2. the standard was too bad


I'm leaning towards the first option.

With best regards,

Janoshik

WARNING: Only reply to emails from info@janoshik.com or domain janoshik.com “
So basically a mistake was made (standard too bad or human error) and it was addressed and corrected? He was banned for that?
 
So basically a mistake was made (standard too bad or human error) and it was addressed and corrected? He was banned for that?

Except Jano wasn’t the one to catch it. They sent a sample twice and got two wildly different results. It was only AFTER when he was questioned about the results that he realized his assistant made a whoops.
 
Ah Jano, what have you gotten yourself into bro?
Received over 200 samples in less than a week, got overwhelmed, mistake happened because I was unable to oversee everything and burned out.

I am pretty sad about the situation, because I'm doing my best, but such is life.

Depressing and I'll be judged on the one mistake, which affected 5 samples, not the 280 results that got done right, as I had double-checked everything that was done in the said time-frame.

I have enough saved, so I might consider slowly phasing out of the business and finally enjoy some free time in my life.
 
Received over 200 samples in less than a week, got overwhelmed, mistake happened because I was unable to oversee everything and burned out.

I am pretty sad about the situation, because I'm doing my best, but such is life.

Depressing and I'll be judged on the one mistake, which affected 5 samples, not the 280 results that got done right, as I had double-checked everything that was done in the said time-frame.

I have enough saved, so I might consider slowly phasing out of the business and finally enjoy some free time in my life.
I’m really surprised they banned you over that one incident.
 
Maybe you have stated it before and I overlooked it or something but have you always said that you are not the only one doing the analysis? In fact, compounds are tested by “staff” and results are shown with your name/brand on them? I was under the impression that you solely did the analysis when compounds are sent to you...?
Please correct me if I’m wrong or if I’m just misunderstanding things.
I answer here because I don't want to pollute another thread.

I am not entirely clear what you mean. I used to have a partner many years ago, but I started working alone, because my partner was unreliable with deadlines and the quality of work tended to degrade when he was busy.

I also had an employee for a few months about a year ago, but the guy, despite his qualifications, was unable to meet the standards I hold my work to, so I published zero reports on which he worked and redid all the work myself. I have not been able to find an employee skilled and responsible enough so far.

The analyses themselves are always and have always been all done by me. If you see a report with my signature and a verification code, it could have only been me personally who had issued it.

Last week I received an excess of 200 samples and it was not humanly possible to process them all alone, so I got some help with the more menial and less demanding tasks, such as labeling, documentation and weighting. Actually, I believe it was only labeling, documentation and weighting.

Documentation alone takes a lot of time, as, for the cases like this I need all the data to be traceable (so for example, take sample 1C, bold cyp contaminated with nandrolone from the Pristine - within minutes I can tell you what glassware was used, which batch the pipette tips were, whether any samples containing nandrolone were tested around that sample that could have caused the contamination [none], where the rest of the sample is stored, locate the raw data, etc)

Hope this answers your question.
 
I answer here because I don't want to pollute another thread.

I am not entirely clear what you mean. I used to have a partner many years ago, but I started working alone, because my partner was unreliable with deadlines and the quality of work tended to degrade when he was busy.

I also had an employee for a few months about a year ago, but the guy, despite his qualifications, was unable to meet the standards I hold my work to, so I published zero reports on which he worked and redid all the work myself. I have not been able to find an employee skilled and responsible enough so far.

The analyses themselves are always and have always been all done by me. If you see a report with my signature and a verification code, it could have only been me personally who had issued it.

Last week I received an excess of 200 samples and it was not humanly possible to process them all alone, so I got some help with the more menial and less demanding tasks, such as labeling, documentation and weighting. Actually, I believe it was only labeling, documentation and weighting.

Documentation alone takes a lot of time, as, for the cases like this I need all the data to be traceable (so for example, take sample 1C, bold cyp contaminated with nandrolone from the Pristine - within minutes I can tell you what glassware was used, which batch the pipette tips were, whether any samples containing nandrolone were tested around that sample that could have caused the contamination [none], where the rest of the sample is stored, locate the raw data, etc)

Hope this answers your question.
Yes it did. Thanks for taking the time to explain.
 
Back
Top