Joints/Tendons/Bone

Brown TJ, Pittman AL, Monaco GN, et al. Androgen treatment and recovery of function following recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in the rat. Restor Neurol Neurosci. Androgen treatment and recovery of function following recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in the rat - Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience - IOS Press

Purpose: To investigate the effects of the androgen testosterone propionate (TP), on regeneration of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) after unilateral crush injury using assessment of vocal fold mobility (VFM) as a measure of behavioral recovery.

Methods: 48 adult male rats underwent standardized crush injury of left RLN and received treatment in the form of 2 silasticcapsules containing TP or controls receiving a blank capsule (untreated). Direct laryngoscopic assessment of vocal cord mobility was performed before, immediately following and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 weeks post injury.

Results: Treatment with TP enhanced the recovery of full VFM following crush injury of the RLN compared to controls. There was statistically significant improvement in VFM seen at the 1 and 2 week time points (p < 0.05). By 4 weeks TP-treated rats displayed a 100% recovery of VFM function, compared to only 50% by the control group.

Conclusions: TP enhances RLN functional recovery following a crush injury, which further supports its potential general applicability as a therapeutic agent in peripheral nerve injury.
 
Dr. Scally, have you ever come across a study that linked exogenous test to an increase in hippocampus neurogenesis? It seems like there would be a logical connection between the two.
 
Dr. Scally, have you ever come across a study that linked exogenous test to an increase in hippocampus neurogenesis? It seems like there would be a logical connection between the two.

Yes! Do you want the cites? BTW: This might be involved in AIH/PCT treatment.
 
Yes! Do you want the cites? BTW: This might be involved in AIH/PCT treatment.
Yes please, I would like the cites. You're saying neurogenesis might be involved in AIH/PCT treatment?

Completely unrelated, but do you know of any additional ways to increase neurogenesis other than blueberries, SSRI's, meditation, calorie defecits, and learning?
 
Filova B, Ostatnikova D, Celec P, Hodosy J. The Effect of Testosterone on the Formation of Brain Structures. Cells Tissues Organs. The Effect of Testosterone on the Formation of Brain Structures

It has been confirmed in several studies that testosterone can significantly affect brain development. Following metabolism of this hormone by 5alpha-reductase to dihydrotestosterone, testosterone may act via androgen receptors, or after conversion by aromatase to estradiol, it may act via estrogen receptors. The parts of the brain which are changed under the influence of sex hormones are known as sexually dimorphic nuclei, especially in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that testosterone also influences the structure of the hippocampus, specifically CA1 and CA3 areas of the hippocampus, as well as the amygdala. These brain areas are designed to convert information from short-term into long-term memory. In this review, we summarize the effects of testosterone on the organization of brain structures with respect to spatial cognitive abilities in small rodents.
 
Spadari A, Romagnoli N, Predieri PG, Borghetti P, Cantoni AM, Corradi A. Effects of intraarticular treatment with stanozolol on synovial membrane and cartilage in an ovine model of osteoarthritis. Res Vet Sci. ScienceDirect.com - Research in Veterinary Science - Effects of intraarticular treatment with stanozolol on synovial membrane and cartilage in an ovine model of osteoarthritis

Aim of the study was to verify the clinical and morphological effects of intra-articular stanozolol or placebo treatment, lasting 3 and 9 months, in sheep in which a femoro-tibial osteo-arthritis (OA) were surgically induced (medial bilateral meniscectomy). Twenty healthy sheep divided into four groups and two control animals group, after surgical medial bilateral meniscectomy, were weekly injected in femoral-tibial joint (FTJ) with stanozolol or placebo. Lameness evaluation was performed and synovial fluid was collected from all sheep at each treatment time. Necropsies were performed after 3 or 9month as described in experimental design. Gross pathologies were described and specimen tissues collected from femoro-tibial articular joints were processed for routine histological examination. The gross anatomy of the FTJ was well-preserved in stanozolol-treated sheep; this also applied to the histological features of articular cartilage. Joint aseptic inflammation and fibrosis were observed in placebo-treated sheep, associated with a different degree of severity of condylar and tibial plate cartilage degeneration. Stanozolol intra-articular treatment reduces osteophytes formation and subchondral bone reaction and promotes articular cartilage regeneration.
 
Ahmad F, Yunus SM, Asghar A, Faruqi NA. Influence of anabolic steroid on tibial fracture healing in rabbits - a study on experimental model. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7(1):93-6. http://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/2679/24- 4863_E(C)_PF1(M)_F(P)_PF1(P)_PFA(PM)_PF1(RP)-u.pdf

Anabolic steroid is an established drug for treating catabolic states. The said drug has been shown to restore the lean body mass, to prevent osteoporosis and to correct the impaired immune response, but only few studies have evaluated the effect of the same on fracture healing. Fracture was produced by an impact device in 24 rabbits which were divided into experimental (I) and control (II) groups of 12 animals each. The experimental groups were further divided into the subgroups IA and IB of equal animals, which received Nandrolone Decanoate 10 mg/kg intramuscularly, biweekly for 2 weeks and 4 weeks respectively. Radiographs taken on the post fracture day 15 and 40 showed better healing in the Nandrolone Decanoate administrated groups as a dense periosteal bone formation and prevention of the local osteoporosis. Histochemical examination of the callus and high serum alkaline phosphatase levels on day 15 and 40 confirmed better mineralization in experimental animals.
 
Vestergaard P, Jorgensen JO, Olesen JL, et al. Local administration of growth hormone stimulates tendon collagen synthesis in elderly men. J Appl Physiol 2012;113(9):1432-8. Local administration of growth hormone stimulates tendon collagen synthesis in elderly men

Tendon collagen content and circulating growth hormone (GH) are reduced in elderly. In a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, we examined if local injections of rhGH enhance collagen synthesis in healthy elderly men (61 +/- 1 yr). Two injections of rhGH or saline (control) were injected into each of the patient's patellar tendons, respectively. Subsequently, tendon collagen fractional synthesis rate (FSR) and an indirect marker of type I collagen synthesis (PINP) were measured. Within the first 6 h after the last injections, a tendency towards a higher tendon collagen FSR was observed in 10 out of 12 subjects (P = 0.08). Similarly, PINP was higher 3-4 h after the last GH injection (P = 0.05). Serum IGF-I did not change from baseline, whereas peritendinous bioactive IGF-I was higher in the GH leg vs. control (P = 0.05). In conclusion, local injections of rhGH increase tendon collagen synthesis in humans, either directly or indirectly by increasing local bioactive IGF-I.
 
Seynnes OR, Kamandulis S, Kairaitis R, et al. Effect of Androgenic-Anabolic Steroids and Heavy Strength Training on Patellar Tendon Morphological and Mechanical Properties. Journal of Applied Physiology. Effect of Androgenic-Anabolic Steroids and Heavy Strength Training on Patellar Tendon Morphological and Mechanical Properties

Combined androgenic-anabolic steroids (AAS) and overloading affects tendon collagen metabolism and ultrastructure, and is often associated with a higher risk of injury. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether such effects would be reflected in the patellar tendon properties of individuals with a history of long-term resistance training and AAS abuse (RTS group), when compared to trained (RT) and untrained (CTRL) non-steroids users. Tendon cross-sectional area (CSA), stiffness, Young's modulus and toe-limit strain were measured in vivo, from synchronized ultrasonography and dynamometry data. The patellar tendon of RT and RTS subjects was much stiffer and larger than in the CTRL group. However, stiffness and modulus were higher in the RTS group (26%, P < 0.05 and 30%, P < 0.01, respectively) than in the RT group. Conversely, tendon CSA was 15% (P < 0.05) larger in the RT group than in RTS, although differences disappeared when this variable was normalized to quadriceps maximal isometric torque. Yet maximal tendon stress was higher in RTS than in RT (15%, P < 0.05), without any statistical difference in maximal strain and toe limit strain between groups. The present lack of difference in toe-limit strain does not substantiate the hypothesis of changes in collagen crimp pattern associated with AAS abuse. However, these findings indicate that tendon adaptations from years of heavy resistance training are different in AAS users, suggesting differences in collagen remodelling. Some of these adaptations (e.g. higher stress) could be linked to a higher risk of tendon injury.
 
Baumgarten KM, Oliver HA, Foley J, et al. Human growth hormone may be detrimental when used to accelerate recovery from acute tendon-bone interface injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(9):783-9. http://jbjs.org/article.aspx?articleid=1679100

BACKGROUND: There have been few scientific studies that have examined usage of human growth hormone to accelerate recovery from injury. The hypothesis of this study was that human growth hormone would accelerate tendon-to-bone healing compared with control animals treated with placebo in a rat model of acute rotator cuff injury repair.

METHODS: Seventy-two rats underwent repair of acute rotator cuff injuries and were randomized into the following postoperative dosing regimens: placebo, and human growth hormone at 0.1, 1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day, administered subcutaneously once per day for fourteen days (Protocol 1). An additional twenty-four rats were randomized to receive either (1) placebo or (2) human growth hormone at 5 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously twice per day for seven days preoperatively and twenty-eight days postoperatively (Protocol 2). All rats were killed twenty-eight days postoperatively. Mechanical testing was performed. Ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, and ultimate distension were determined.

RESULTS: For Protocol 1, analysis of variance testing showed no significant difference between the groups with regard to ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, or ultimate distension. In Protocol 2, ultimate force to failure was significantly worse in the human growth hormone group compared with the placebo group (21.1 +/- 5.85 versus 26.3 +/- 5.47 N; p = 0.035). Failure was more likely to occur through the bone than the tendon-bone interface in the human growth hormone group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.001). No significant difference was found for ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, or ultimate distension between the groups in Protocol 2.

CONCLUSIONS: In this rat model of acute tendon-bone injury repair, daily subcutaneous postoperative human growth hormone treatment for fourteen days failed to demonstrate a significant difference in any biomechanical parameter compared with placebo. Furthermore, subcutaneous administration of 5 mg/kg of human growth hormone twice daily from seven days preoperatively until twenty-eight days postoperatively demonstrated lower loads to ultimate failure and a higher risk of bone fracture failure compared with placebo.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that human growth hormone treatment does not identifiably accelerate the strength of tendon-to-bone healing from acute injury and may have negative biomechanical consequences.
 
Human Growth Hormone May Not Have Biomechanical Benefits, But Is It Detrimental?: Commentary on an article by Keith M. Baumgarten, MD, et al.: “Human Growth Hormone May Be Detrimental When Used to Accelerate Recovery from Acute Tendon-Bone Interface Injuries”
http://jbjs.org/article.aspx?articleid=1679118


Off-label usage of biopharmaceuticals has sometimes been the source of anecdotal clinical impressions that in turn have led to suboptimal patient care. In the case of human growth hormone, these issues are further confounded by controversies regarding inappropriate performance enhancements in athletics, which have been well publicized in the lay media.

The laboratory research study by Baumgarten et al. is an important contribution in this area, in that it provides an objective assessment of the level of efficacy of human growth hormone for accelerating the healing of acute tendon-bone interface injuries. The model adopted, which involves acute rotator cuff repair in the rat, has become well established in the orthopaedic scientific literature for studying the pathophysiology and treatment of these common human injuries.

The authors chose to concentrate on biomechanical outcome measures with their rationale being that, unless human growth hormone could demonstrably accelerate the functional healing that would otherwise occur, there was little point in detailed histologic or molecular biological assessments. The rat model held substantial attraction logistically, in that it allowed usage of a relatively large number of study animals (ninety-six), thus providing reasonable statistical power to consider a clinically relevant range of plausible dosage regimens.

While using the rat model required trading off for a number of simplifications relative to the human clinical setting, the authors insightfully reviewed those considerations in the Discussion section of the article, providing well-reasoned arguments with substantiation from precedent literature in order to justify their model.

The study’s findings were both definitive and convincing: No benefits whatsoever were statistically demonstrable biomechanically from human growth hormone usage for any of the dosage regimens considered. The biomechanical testing itself involved a single configuration of loading, applying tension across the originally failed tendon-bone interface. The raw load-versus-deformation data from that single testing configuration were processed to arrive at a number of repair performance metrics: ultimate stress (i.e., failure stress), ultimate force, ultimate displacement, energy to failure, and stiffness.

Each of these biomechanical performance metrics has a different specific interpretation physically, although all of them are reflective of interfacial mechanical integrity. For example, the tensile force necessary to cause interface failure on the one hand, and the energy absorbed during the course of the event of interface failure on the other hand, are physically distinct quantities, although both are reflective of the degree of mechanical integrity of the interface repair.

Since these various biomechanical performance metrics involved different aspects of interface repair integrity, they did not all respond totally in lockstep for the respective dosage regimens. For the great majority of permutations of performance metric and dosage regimen, human growth hormone showed no significant effect. For some permutations, there was an upward trend, and for others there was a downward trend, with no apparent evidence of a dose-response effect. The single exception was that significance was reached (p = 0.035) for the case of ultimate force for a dosage regimen of 5 mg/kg/day given twice a day for twenty-eight days, for which human growth hormone caused a 19.8% decrement.

While there clearly was no evidence that human growth hormone was of any biomechanical benefit in this setting, opinions might legitimately differ as to whether or not human growth hormone might in fact be actively detrimental. The authors interpreted the 19.8% ultimate force reduction for the twenty-eight-day regimen as evidence of a plausibly detrimental effect, and they opted not to qualify such an effect as being “mild” or “moderate.” Readers are invited to review the actual data in Tables I and III to form their own impressions in that regard.
 
Yang S, Cao L, Cai S, Yuan J, Wang J. A systematic review of growth hormone for hip fractures. Growth Horm IGF Res 2012;22(3-4):97-101. Elsevier

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) for hip fractures.

DESIGN: Based on the principles and methods of Cochrane systematic reviews, we searched the Cochrane Library (2011, 3 issue), PubMed (1966 to October 2011), EMBASE (1974 to October 2011), OVID database (1963 to October 2011), Chinese Bio-medicine database (1978 to October 2011), China Journal Full-text Database (1979 to October 2011), and VIP database (1989 to October 2011). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of GH treatment for hip fractures were included. We assessed the quality of included trials according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version. The Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.0 was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS: 3 RCTs with a total of 162 hip fractures patients were included. Results of GH compared to placebo treatment showed that IGF-I levels significantly increased in the short term, but no significant differences in the long term. Additionally, there was no statistical difference in adverse events. Only one trial reported the measurement of bone mineral content (BMC), which showed that GH group was unchanged while the placebo group lost BMC at both 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Only one study measuring BMC showed no significant differences in the change of the MBI scores between GH group and placebo group; however, the changes from baseline in the hGH group were less than that in the placebo group among the older than 75 years group. Owing to the difference of measurement indexes in those studies, we could not perform a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: With the low quality of current evidence, GH may be effective in hip fractures. More carefully designed, double-blinded and placebo-controlled randomized trials with large numbers of participants about GH in the treatment of hip fractures are required.
 
Baumgarten KM, Oliver HA, Foley J, et al. Human growth hormone may be detrimental when used to accelerate recovery from acute tendon-bone interface injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(9):783-9. http://jbjs.org/article.aspx?articleid=1679100

BACKGROUND: There have been few scientific studies that have examined usage of human growth hormone to accelerate recovery from injury. The hypothesis of this study was that human growth hormone would accelerate tendon-to-bone healing compared with control animals treated with placebo in a rat model of acute rotator cuff injury repair.

METHODS: Seventy-two rats underwent repair of acute rotator cuff injuries and were randomized into the following postoperative dosing regimens: placebo, and human growth hormone at 0.1, 1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day, administered subcutaneously once per day for fourteen days (Protocol 1). An additional twenty-four rats were randomized to receive either (1) placebo or (2) human growth hormone at 5 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously twice per day for seven days preoperatively and twenty-eight days postoperatively (Protocol 2). All rats were killed twenty-eight days postoperatively. Mechanical testing was performed. Ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, and ultimate distension were determined.

RESULTS: For Protocol 1, analysis of variance testing showed no significant difference between the groups with regard to ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, or ultimate distension. In Protocol 2, ultimate force to failure was significantly worse in the human growth hormone group compared with the placebo group (21.1 +/- 5.85 versus 26.3 +/- 5.47 N; p = 0.035). Failure was more likely to occur through the bone than the tendon-bone interface in the human growth hormone group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.001). No significant difference was found for ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, or ultimate distension between the groups in Protocol 2.

CONCLUSIONS: In this rat model of acute tendon-bone injury repair, daily subcutaneous postoperative human growth hormone treatment for fourteen days failed to demonstrate a significant difference in any biomechanical parameter compared with placebo. Furthermore, subcutaneous administration of 5 mg/kg of human growth hormone twice daily from seven days preoperatively until twenty-eight days postoperatively demonstrated lower loads to ultimate failure and a higher risk of bone fracture failure compared with placebo.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that human growth hormone treatment does not identifiably accelerate the strength of tendon-to-bone healing from acute injury and may have negative biomechanical consequences.

Chutkan NB, Kelly JDt. Human growth hormone may be detrimental when used to accelerate recovery from acute tendon-bone interface injuries. Orthopedics 2013;36(7):539-40. Human growth hormone may be detrimental when use... [Orthopedics. 2013] - PubMed - NCBI

The authors of this elegant article investigate the use of growth hormone as a mean to enhance rotator cuff repair in Rats. Seventy-two rats underwent repair of surgically created rotator cuff tears and were randomized into the following postoperative doses of subcutaneously administered human growth hormone (HGH): 0.1, 1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day, administered for fourteen days in addition to a placebo group (Protocol 1).

An additional cohort of twenty-four rats were randomized to receive either placebo or HGH at 5 mg/kg, twice daily for seven days preoperatively and twenty-eight days postoperatively (Protocol 2) All rats were sacrificed at 28 days and underwent mechanical testing to determine ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, and ultimate distension.

Results, as determined by analysis of variance testing, showed no significant difference between any of the groups administered HGH postoperatively and placebo. (Protocol1) For the subjects receiving the pre op dose and prolonged post operative regime, (Protocol2) ultimate force to failure was significantly less than the placebo group (21.1 ± 5.85 versus 26.3 ± 5.47 N; p = 0.035).

While no significant difference was found for ultimate stress, ultimate force, stiffness, energy to failure, or ultimate distension between was found, mechanical failure was more likely to occur through the bone than the tendon-bone interface in the treatment group when compared to placebo (p = 0.001).

Perspective

Human growth hormone has been used by athletes and clinicians alike as a means of accelerating recovery after injury. Firm scientific evidence for its efficacy in enhancing soft tissue repair is lacking.

Growth hormone does indeed have an anabolic effect on muscle growth by increasing sarcomere amino acid and glucose uptake while it potentiates lipolysis . Indeed, many aging athletes regard it as the ‘fountain of youth’. HGH does in fact accelerate collagen synthesis; thus the authors ask a pertinent question about its effects on bone-tendon healing.

This fairly well designed prospective study indicates that systemically administered HGH confers no anabolic effect on rotator cuff repair and may prove deleterious to healing in higher dosing schedules. The rat model for rotator cuff disorders is well established and appears to correlate well to the human condition.

While slightly underpowered, this investigation is another testament of failure in search of the ‘Holy Grail’ of cuff healing enhancement. The inconsistent results of platelet rich plasma, with noted potential negative effects, mirror those of this study.

Of note, the prolonged dosage group gained appreciable weight, raising the specter of adverse metabolic consequences with HGH administration–i.e hyperglycemia. Weight gain and its accompanying metabolic syndrome is ‘pro inflammatory’ and is associated with increased cytokine production.

Perhaps modulation of inflammation, as Rodeo et al have shown with matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, will prove to be the most effective means of enhancing soft tissue repair.

Before I give my patients HGH, which promotes hypertension, hyperglycemia and acromegaly, I would much rather choose tight glucose control, smoking cessation, and both Vit. D and Omega 3 fatty acid supplementation in order to mitigate inflammation and enhance healing.
 
Isaacs J, Feher J, Shall M, et al. Effects of nandrolone on recovery after neurotization of chronically denervated muscle in a rat model. J Neurosurg. An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Object - Suboptimal recovery following repair of major peripheral nerves has been partially attributed to denervation atrophy. Administration of anabolic steroids in conjunction with neurotization may improve functional recovery of chronically denervated muscle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the administration of nandrolone on muscle recovery following prolonged denervation in a rat model.

Methods - Eight groups of female Sprague-Dawley rats (15 rats per group, 120 in all) were divided into 3- or 6-month denervated hind limb and sham surgery groups and, then, nandrolone treatment groups and sham treatment groups. Evaluation of treatment effects included nerve conduction, force of contraction, comparative morphology, histology (of muscle fibers), protein electrophoresis (for muscle fiber grouping), and immunohistochemical evaluation.

Results - Although a positive trend was noted, neither reinnervated nor normal muscle showed a statistically significant increase in peak muscle force following nandrolone treatment. Indirect measures, including muscle mass (weight and diameter), muscle cell size, muscle fiber type, and satellite cell counts, all failed to support significant anabolic effect.

Conclusions - There does not seem to be a functional benefit from nandrolone treatment following reinnervation of either mild or moderately atrophic muscle (related to prolonged denervation) in a rodent model.
 
A few posts discuss this earlier in the thread...
Is there actual evidence for boldenone having such significant effects on collagen synthesis?
 
Monaco GN, Brown TJ, Burgette RC, et al. Electrical stimulation and testosterone enhance recovery from recurrent laryngeal nerve crush. Restor Neurol Neurosci. Electrical stimulation and testosterone enhance recovery from recurrent laryngeal nerve crush - Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience - IOS Press

Objective: This study investigated the effects of a combinatorial treatment, consisting of a brief period of nerve electrical stimulation (ES) and systemic supraphysiologic testosterone, on functional recovery following a crush of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN).

Study design: Prospective, controlled animal study. Methods: After a crush of the left RLN, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four treatment groups: 1) no treatment, 2) ES, 3) testosterone propionate (TP), and 4) ES + TP. Each group was subdivided into 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks post-operative survival time points. Groups had an n of 4-9. Recovery of vocal fold mobility (VFM) was assessed.

Results: Brief ES of the proximal nerve alone or in combination with TP accelerated the initiation of functional recovery. TP administration by itself also produced increased VFM scores compared to controls, but there were no statistical differences between the ES-treated and TP-treated animals. Treatment with brief ES alone was sufficient to decrease the time required to recover complete VFM. Animals with complete VFM were seen in treatment groups as early as 1 week following injury; in the untreated group, this was not observed until at least 3 weeks post-injury, translating into a 66% decrease in time to complete recovery.

Conclusions: Brief ES, alone or in combination with TP, promise to be effective therapeutic interventions for promoting regeneration following RLN injury.
 
Back
Top