Sworder
Member
Then by this same property, you might also have false positives, no?
If so, then this refutes your next post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then by this same property, you might also have false positives, no?
If so, then this refutes your next post.
The steroids identification test kit is used by customs and law enforcements in various countries. Our products are also approved to be purchased by United Nations for various agencies as a tool to detect controlled substances. It works the same way like preliminary colorimetric test for detection of drugs. Although colorimetric tests are not new, there was never anything reliable to test for presence of steroids before. Follow the links on the bottom of this page to see examples and full documentation of various tests.
http://shop.narcotictests.com/become-distributor
http://www.narcotictests.com/online-courses/basic-certification.html
I have been user of this test for a long time and I am not pinning corn oil anymore. It is not 100% bullet proof but those guys pay $5 for single test vial and expect it to be HPLC or GCMS.
It is very well documented. If you have good test prop, it will show you it will react with proper colors. If you have NPP it will show you it will react with different colors, etc... It will react with different color to different steroids, you cannot fool this.
If you have only corn oil it will show you that it is fake.
UV light is the most important part of the test and this guy Bill Roberts does not even mention it, he has no understanding of the test.
Since you seem to have such a strong grasp of the testing procedure, perhaps you can win this argument by thoroughly explaining to everyone here why labmax is accurate in detecting certain hormones? You seem to bash others who disagree with the testing method and throw out accusations that others don't understand the testing process, so you SHOULD be able to explain it yourself?!
Just ran across this thread after getting done with 5 labmax tests on 3 different brands of primo, 1 test e, and 1 test c. Found 1 total DUD, GP primo which was just a retest from a while back, and NONE of the rest were anything I would call a PASS for what they were supposed to be. Some possible presence of hormone in the other 4, but all very vague and not even remotely definitive. Also aside from the UV test, seems like every compound I have EVER tried, always turns brown to dark brown in A and B vials. My biggest problem is if someone for relies on this, it is dangerous. You wouldnt want your wife pinning 200-300 mg/wk thinking it was Primo and turned out to be test or something worse. So what do you think Hotdog ?I could say the same thing?? Why do you try so hard to discredit? You have a whole fucking thread dedicated to how much LM sux ?douchetard. We already know you take handouts for reviews?
I back testing of any kind. And I support consumer awareness and vigilance, and the exposing of liars and cheats like yourself. So yea I understand what LM is and what it does. And yes I would encourage aas users to LM their gear if able.
And Labmax will most importantly tell you A hormone is present, of any concentration. It's pass fail, we know this. Some ppl don't have time or patience "to pin 5wks worth of gear and see", i want to see if my var is winny, if my oils contain hormone