There is no regulation from congress telling lenders to give loans to people who cant afford them. Are you actually trying to say regulations caused the housing crisis and financial institutions shouldnt be regulated?
I actually like you man and im really hoping I misinterpreted your post!
I'm saying regulations fueled the bubble. Would the banks have screwed it up anyway? I'm of the opinion they wouldn't have done without the CRA and similar state and city laws, as well as buyer subsidies masking the high probability of default.
The Government Did It
From the article:
"The CRA forces banks to make loans in poor communities, loans that banks may otherwise reject as financially unsound. Under the CRA, banks must convince a set of bureaucracies that they are not engaging in discrimination, a charge that the act encourages any CRA-recognized community group to bring forward. Otherwise, any merger or expansion the banks attempt will likely be denied. But what counts as discrimination?
"According to one enforcement agency, “discrimination exists when a lender’s underwriting policies contain arbitrary or outdated criteria that effectively disqualify many urban or lower-income minority applicants.” Note that these “arbitrary or outdated criteria” include most of the essentials of responsible lending: income level, income verification, credit history and savings history–the very factors lenders are now being criticized for ignoring."
"According to one enforcement agency, “discrimination exists when a lender’s underwriting policies contain arbitrary or outdated criteria that effectively disqualify many urban or lower-income minority applicants.” Note that these “arbitrary or outdated criteria” include most of the essentials of responsible lending: income level, income verification, credit history and savings history–the very factors lenders are now being criticized for ignoring."
There is more to it than the Forbes article covers, but it does give you the part you are directly challenging.